读后左右天才。。。读后记（Talent around... Reading postscript）

左右天才。 。 。读后记Talent around. . . Reading postscriptIf life is just like seeing the initial network version of thedeadline, people ask me, why separate the interception of thissentence, have what meaning?Yes。 When I was years old, I readit for the first time. I thought it was written by a woman. Lookat the author: nalanrongruo. Oh, girl. It was only six monthslater that he was not a woman, but an official at the beginningof the Qing dynasty. This is an introduction. The couple ofyears immersed in the Tang Song Ci and antithesis neat andconcise; Yuanqu: Chic - of course I just described on thesurface. Wait until you see more of them. After understandingthe author, began to be interested in those historicalbackgrounds. Then went out of control. From the humanitiescontinue to the economy, from the economy continued to socialstructure, continue from social structure to politics, frompolitical continuity to religion, from religious continuationto philosophy, from the philosophy extended to psychology, frompsychology to medical continuation. . . . . . Later, I found thata lot of things to a certain extent, are interlocking. Thissurprised me at the age of more than 20. And then start a moresweeping sweep of reading. Sometimes I don't even have time todigest, just remember. But that' s what makes it a habit: ignorethe text itself, and look at the back of the text. But laterresearch of characters and symbols by force, that is anotherstory. Then began insomnia + biological clock disorders. Forhalf a year, sleep every two days, and sleep for about 12 hoursat a time. Insomnia is not like sleep, insomnia, neurasthenia,is the kind of special spirit. Because I also feel that is notnormal. So sometimes deliberately to find some very obscurebooks, think it will do wonders for hypnosis. I remember readinga bunch of books about physics and quantum mechanics at a

friend' s home (the father of a friend who did it) and borrowedit. Did not see sleepy, see frightened. Followed by a lot ofquestions around to rub classes to listen to. Before long, Ifound out that the problem was great. Because of the physical,see more, more questions, they begin questioningwhat is it allabout -- unsolved too much, even those that have been appliedin principle is still unsolved state. At that time, in orderto give myself a seemingly clear answer, I began to go tononlinear dynamics, plane space, and so on. But it backfired,and questions began to multiply exponentially. I'm lost. Thenhe began to have contact with the mentally ill. And then there' sa funny thing: many mental patients can quickly find someexplanation for the answer. No matter is the ghost fox strangephysical or biological or always firmly confirmed. I was evenmore confused, and even worried: "am I having a problem?" Thestate of panic kept onme until one day, I saw this again: "lifeis like a beginning. "". Then, suddenly, suddenly. That' s whyI intercepted this sentence. At the end of this book, I wanttomake it clear to you that there are nearly 20 more real cases,and some, for some reasons, have added or deleted content basedon real cases. So, I hope you don' t indulge in this book whenyou read it. Don't judge yourself and the people around you onthe basis of this book. It' s too one-sided and arbitrary. I havealways thought that it is a very, very great thing to thinkseriously. Maybe join Q: ideological strength? Can you makemoney? I can give a positive answer: strong, can make money(laughs) . The Taoist said flexible, Buddhist nature, hearttheory knowledge is actually a meaning. If you are interestedin checking, you will find that all the people who are verycattle have a set of their own ideological system, and it isvery complete and rigorous. I know that it is not easy to come

out. It has been formed by many times of careful thinking andmany times of overthrowing and rebuilding. But the reason whythere are so few cows and many dreamers is that they are applied.The key is to get used to, but not to use, is the most terrible.Of course, there are people who do not want to use it, and thereality has been ignored. For that kind of person, I' ll sortmy way-immortal. And the unknown. For this, I do not recommendusing the known to deny the unknown easily, or denying itthrough real deep thinking. Copying and rudeness are bad things.But facing the unknown, there is no need to be afraid, but tolearn to respect the unknown. In fact, that is also respect foryourself. Give yourself a chance to try to understand andanalyze, and then there is the possibility of thinking andexploring. Well, here' s the end of the book. But I hope thatmy own thoughts will continue. Thank you for reading it andreading it,

I remember it all in my mind. "Life is but a beginning. ". "Two

How do you start? I really don't want to say that this book hasmade me see so many genius level lunatics, or that some geniusis defined as crazy by secular people when no one can understandit. These are not the internal causes that I am moved by thisbook. So what am I supposed to say?

This book was recommended to me by the teacher, and it wasmentioned at the lecture of miss zeng. In fact, the fact thatmadmen and geniuses are simply classified by the world is thatI am resistant to this book. But as the reading page unfolds,

I do not see the author assimilating the compulsion of themadman and the genius, but simply listing some mental patientsto talk to him. From the depth of the subject to the simplicityof the recording style, and in my opinion, the emotionalprogression between the chapters, all this has opened a newworld in my mind, and I have seen a new realm in my mind. Andin the author' s down-to-earth or no literary record, I saw histangled, stirring mind, and explored the world and tortured thesincerity of the heart. At this point, I am perturbed is howI will, or whether I can not change the invisible to appeal totangible language.

I know many philosophers and artists will explore the humannature to acertain stagewill fall into the abyss of suffering,in which the inextricable people will choose to escape, escapeis nothing more than two kinds of results: "asylum" or Dutchact. Such as Xu Wei, Nietzsche, Hemingway, Van Gogh, Kawabataand so on, including Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, andlater moved towards a psychopathic state.

But I never knew that more natural science researchers wouldget into this situation (at least most of the examples arerelated to natural science) . These mental patients make me seethat there are so many infinite stretches of space andpossibilities in natural science that there are so many modernsciences that cannot be explored. Perhaps the word "essence"is weak in natural science because the natural sciences are toovast, and all the "essence" will be just a little post. Theylet me know the nature of science is not only a singlematerialistic and spiritual world, it will say or peopleclosely intertwined (to the word derives from the theory of

Schopenhauer, please allow me to take this on translation,without the use of the vast majority of people acceptedtranslation: will) . And this too mysterious and unknowablemakes some searchers deviate from the secular orbit in thespiritual dialogue with the world.

I've read Hocking' s brief history of time. (write here, notseriously, and think of a funny saying on the Internet: do youhave time, Jian, Shi?) The first half of the first half, andindeed the latter part, is because some of the conceptualdifficulties of understanding have given me up to read. Ihaven't studied Newton or Einstein seriously. I know onlytextbooks for junior high school. So, as a layman, I was shockedby the depth and logic of the study of so many "mad men" in thebook (allowing me to shock and not shock) .

I suddenly feel that Zhong Yong has nothing to do with "hurt",and "degeneration" is, to some extent, a blessing. Whatsuffering and pain will accompany him if he continues his wayof genius?. Genius is lonely, and loneliness must have a strongenough heart to face the world and face itself. Of course, whena person cannot answer himself, there can be a solution, thatis, to take refuge in religion. But if your heart is not strongenough, relying on religion will be a terrible thing; and ifthe heart is strong enough, why should it be religious?Other cases in the book is scientifically irrelevant, those whoare unable to understand the ideas and practices of the world,that is to say, their behavior and consciousness is not in the"normal" track, and beyond this system. But there is no suchthing as the absence of the deepest emotion as the basis. Even

I would like to think in a different way and imagine that ifthe majority of the people in the world face their feelings andact in their own way, then the world will be acceptable. Whynot?

Surprisingly, many of the "lunatics" in the book are willingto stay in mental hospitals. Not because we want to avoid theworld, but to try to draw the line from those outside us - thementally ill. Think not be affected, they can enjoy unlimitedinside, and they can be on the outside of the US might say "notworth cooperating".

The stories remind me of and even more understanding of thegreat number of freaks, mental patients and many people who donot conform to the conventional vision, experience and judgmentof the female photographer, Diane Arbus, who have spent the restof his life. Before looking at those works, I was concernedabout their social situation, and now,

I see is their spirit and soul, that is independent of good andevil, regardless of high or low, not as people' s heart ofsympathy. Arbus doing similar to the book the same thing, butat the same time, she is in the book and the works or patientrole. In the end, she chose to escape the world to comfort herunbearable heart.

Funny man, the standard established, will guide our steps alongthe trackwill be linedup, some in the process to stopwatchingthe scenery and climbed the hill to see our people crowding andformation simply expelled. And you, after seeing the realscenery, or looking at our team from an onlooker' s point of view,

would you like to come back again?