Peterpatcha
patcha 时间:2021-01-06 阅读:()
Example:TimeseriesfromBaden-Wurttembergsince1930Theeffectivemeshsizehasdecreasedby40%since1930.
TheseresultshavebeencalculatedattheUniversityofStuttgartincollaborationwiththeCenterofTechnologyAssessmentinBaden-WurttembergandtheStateInstituteforEnvironmentalProtectionBaden-Wurttemberg(seeJaegeretal.
2001,Essweinetal.
2002).
Thedegreeoffragmentationcanalsobeexpressedastheeffectivemeshdensity,s,(i.
e.
,theeffectivenumberofpatchesper100km2)whichincreaseswithincreasinglandscapefragmentation(eff1ms=).
LiteratureOnthemethod:Esswein,H.
,Jaeger,J.
,Schwarz-vonRaumer,H.
-G.
2003.
DerGradderLandschaftszerschneidungalsIndikatorimNatur-schutz:unzerschnitteneverkehrsarmeRume(UZR)odereffektiveMaschenweite(meff)–In:NNA-Berichte16(2):53-68Jaeger,J.
A.
G.
2000.
Landscapedivision,splittingindex,andeffectivemeshsize:Newmeasuresoflandscapefrag-mentation.
–Landscapeecology15(2):115-130Jaeger,J.
2002.
Landschaftszerschneidung.
VerlagEugenUlmer,StuttgartJaeger,J.
2004.
VII-12ZerschneidungderLandschaftdurchVer-kehrswegeundSiedlungsgebiete.
–In:W.
Konoldetal.
(Hrsg.
).
HandbuchNaturschutzundLandschaftspflege.
Ecomed-Verlag,LandsbergSchupp,D.
2005.
UmweltindikatorLandschaftszerschneidung.
–GAIA14(2):101-106Casestudiesapplyingthemethod(selection):Esswein,H.
,J.
Jaeger,H.
-G.
Schwarz-vonRaumer,M.
Müller2002.
LandschaftszerschneidunginBaden-Württemberg.
Zer-schneidungsanalysezuraktuellenSituationundzurEntwicklungderletzten70JahremitdereffektivenMaschenweite.
–Arbeits-berichtderAkademiefürTechnikfolgenabschtzungNr.
214,StuttgartJaeger,J.
,H.
Esswein,H.
-G.
Schwarz-vonRaumer,M.
Müller2001.
LandschaftszerschneidunginBaden-Württemberg.
-NaturschutzundLandschaftsplanung33(10):305-317Jaeger,J.
,S.
Grau,W.
Haber(Hrsg.
)2005:Landschaftszerschnei-dung:VonderProblemerkennungzumHandeln.
Themen-schwerpunktheft.
–GAIA14(2):98-185Peter,U.
,S.
Meier2003.
ZerschnitteneLandschaft–einProblemimKantonAargau-UmweltAargauNr.
22:29-32Roedenbeck,I.
A.
,Esswein,H.
,Khler,W.
2005.
Landschafts-zerschneidunginHessen.
–NaturschutzundLandschafts-planung37(10):293-300ContactIfyouhavequestionsorwouldliketoreceivecopiesoftheabovearticlespleasecontactDr.
JochenJaeger:E-mail:jochen.
jaeger@env.
ethz.
chPhone:+41(0)16320826Mail:ChairofNatureandLandscapeProtectionETH-Zentrum,CHNE21.
1CH–8092Zurich,Switzerlandwww:http://www.
nls.
env.
ethz.
ch/staff/jaeger.
htmlZurich,April2004,revisedversionJanuary2006MeasuringLandscapeFragmentationwiththeEffectiveMeshSizemeffbyJochenJaeger,HeideEssweinundHans-GeorgSchwarz-vonRaumerWhatissoproblematicaboutlandscapefragmentationFragmentationoflandscapesisamajorcauseofthealarminglossofspeciesinEurope(e.
g.
,duetotheisolationofpopulationsandtheseparationofcomple-mentarytypesofhabitat).
Inaddition,transportationinfrastructure,aleadingcauseoffragmentation,detri-mentallyaffectstherecreationalqualityoflandscapes(e.
g.
,duetonoisepollutionandthereductioninsizeandqualityofrecreationareas).
Asearlyas1985,theGermanGovernmentsetthepoliticalgoalofpreservinglargeun-fragmentedlow-trafficareas.
However,landscapefragmentationhasincreasedasrapidlyasbeforeduetonewroadsandrailroads,enhancedtrafficvolume,andurbandevelopment.
13.
0113.
6613.
9919.
4622.
9217.
819.
5820.
2420.
5122.
1424.
2631.
605101520253035192019401960198020002020withoutmunicipalroadswithmunicipalroadsmeff[km2]YearWhyistheeffectivemeshsizebetterthanothermethodsFormermeasuresoflandscapefragmentationareseverelylimitedintheirsensitivity(e.
g.
,thedensityoftrafficlinesneglectsthestructureofthetrafficnetworkwhichmaybeevenlydistributedorbundled;thetotalareaoflargeun-fragmentedlow-trafficareas>100km2neglectswhathappenstopatchesthataresmaller).
Thenewmethodhasimportantadvantages.
Itfulfilsallscientific,functional,andpragmaticrequirementsofenvironmentalindicators(Essweinetal.
2003),itissimpleandtransparentandhasanintuitiveinterpretation(seebelow).
Ittakesintoaccountallpatchesaccordingtotheirsize.
Furthermore,testingtheeffectivemeshsizeagainstasystematicsetofninescientificcriteriahasprovenitsaccuracyandsuitability(e.
g,lowsensitivitytosmallpatches,monotonousreactiontodifferentfrag-mentationphases,detectionofstructuraldifferences,andadvantageousmathematicalcharacteristics;seeJaeger2000,2002,2004).
Theeffectivemeshsizeissuitableforcomparingthedegreeoffragmentationoflandscapeswithdifferingtotalsizeandwithdifferingproportionsofurbandevelopmentandtrafficarea.
WhatdoesthevalueoftheeffectivemeshsizemeanTheeffectivemeshsizeisbasedontheprobabilityoftwopointschosenrandomlyinaregionwillbeconnected.
Themorebarriersinthelandscape,thelowertheprobabilitythatthetwopointswillbeconnected,andthelowertheeffectivemeshsize.
Ifalandscapeisfragmentedevenlyintopatchesallofsizemeff,thentheprobabilityofbeingconnectedisthesameasforthefragmentationpatternunderinvestigation.
Itcanalsobeinterpretedastheexpectedsizeofthepatchapointwillbelocatedinthatischosenrandomlyanywhereintheregion,orastheabilityoftwoanimalsofthesamespecies–placedrandomlyinaregion–tofindeachother.
Theprobabilityisconvertedintothesizeofapatch–theeffectivemeshsize–bymultiplyingitbythetotalsizeoftheregioninvestigated.
Thus,theunitofmeffisthatofarea(e.
g.
haorkm2).
Thevalueofmeffisbetween0(entirelyfragmentedordeveloped)andthesizeoftheregioninvestigated(un-fragmented).
Inthecasethatallpatchesareofthesamesize,theeffectivemeshsizeassumesthesizeofthepatchesand,therefore,oftheaveragepatchsize.
However,asthesizeofpatchesusuallydiffers,theeffectivemeshsizeisgenerallynotequaltotheaveragepatchsize.
ThemeasuremeffhasbeendevelopedbyJochenJaegerattheCenterofTechnologyAssessmentinBaden-Wurttemberg,Stuttgart,andattheETHZurich(Jaeger2000,2002,2004).
HowaretheseresultsusefulThedegreeoflandscapefragmentationisanimportantenvironmentalindicatorinthefieldsofbiodiversityandrecreationalqualityand,moregenerally,sustainability.
Inaddition,informationonthedegreeoflandscapefragmentationisrelevantinregionalplanningandfordecisionsaboutinfrastructureplacementorremoval.
Timeseriesshowhowstrongthecurrenttrendsareandwhattheirdirectionis.
WherehastheeffectivemeshsizebeenusedsofarmeffhasalreadybeenusedinBaden-Wurttemberg(seeexampleonotherside),Bavaria,Hesse,Thuringia,Saxony,Schleswig-Holstein,andSouthTyrol(Italy).
In2004,theGermanConferenceoftheMinistersoftheEnvironmentadoptedtherecommendationbytheGermanStateCommitteeCoreIndicatorstouseastandardizedprocedureforcalculatingmeffinallGermanstates.
ThemeffmethodhasalsobeenusedbytheEuropeanEnvironmentalAgency.
Currently,meffisbeingcalculatedinSwitzerlandandCanada.
Exampleofhowtocalculatetheeffectivemeshsize()222221totaleff.
.
.
.
.
.
1niAAAAAm+++++=wheren=numberofpatches,Atotal=totalareaoftheregioninvestigated,andAi=sizeofpatchi(i=1,…,n).
Example:Alandscapeisfragmentedbyhighwaysintothreepatches.
Theprobabilitythattworandomlychosenpointswillbeinpatch1(and,therefore,willbeconnected)is.
25.
05.
05.
02total1==AAThecorrespondingprobabilityis0.
252=0.
0625forbothpatches2and3.
Theprobabilitythatthetwopointswillbeinpatch1or2or3isthesumofthethreeprobabilitieswhichresultsin0.
375.
Multiplyingthisprobabilitybythetotalareaoftheregionfinallygivesthevalueoftheeffectivemeshsize:0.
375·4km2=1.
5km2.
A1A3A2Atotal=4km2
TheseresultshavebeencalculatedattheUniversityofStuttgartincollaborationwiththeCenterofTechnologyAssessmentinBaden-WurttembergandtheStateInstituteforEnvironmentalProtectionBaden-Wurttemberg(seeJaegeretal.
2001,Essweinetal.
2002).
Thedegreeoffragmentationcanalsobeexpressedastheeffectivemeshdensity,s,(i.
e.
,theeffectivenumberofpatchesper100km2)whichincreaseswithincreasinglandscapefragmentation(eff1ms=).
LiteratureOnthemethod:Esswein,H.
,Jaeger,J.
,Schwarz-vonRaumer,H.
-G.
2003.
DerGradderLandschaftszerschneidungalsIndikatorimNatur-schutz:unzerschnitteneverkehrsarmeRume(UZR)odereffektiveMaschenweite(meff)–In:NNA-Berichte16(2):53-68Jaeger,J.
A.
G.
2000.
Landscapedivision,splittingindex,andeffectivemeshsize:Newmeasuresoflandscapefrag-mentation.
–Landscapeecology15(2):115-130Jaeger,J.
2002.
Landschaftszerschneidung.
VerlagEugenUlmer,StuttgartJaeger,J.
2004.
VII-12ZerschneidungderLandschaftdurchVer-kehrswegeundSiedlungsgebiete.
–In:W.
Konoldetal.
(Hrsg.
).
HandbuchNaturschutzundLandschaftspflege.
Ecomed-Verlag,LandsbergSchupp,D.
2005.
UmweltindikatorLandschaftszerschneidung.
–GAIA14(2):101-106Casestudiesapplyingthemethod(selection):Esswein,H.
,J.
Jaeger,H.
-G.
Schwarz-vonRaumer,M.
Müller2002.
LandschaftszerschneidunginBaden-Württemberg.
Zer-schneidungsanalysezuraktuellenSituationundzurEntwicklungderletzten70JahremitdereffektivenMaschenweite.
–Arbeits-berichtderAkademiefürTechnikfolgenabschtzungNr.
214,StuttgartJaeger,J.
,H.
Esswein,H.
-G.
Schwarz-vonRaumer,M.
Müller2001.
LandschaftszerschneidunginBaden-Württemberg.
-NaturschutzundLandschaftsplanung33(10):305-317Jaeger,J.
,S.
Grau,W.
Haber(Hrsg.
)2005:Landschaftszerschnei-dung:VonderProblemerkennungzumHandeln.
Themen-schwerpunktheft.
–GAIA14(2):98-185Peter,U.
,S.
Meier2003.
ZerschnitteneLandschaft–einProblemimKantonAargau-UmweltAargauNr.
22:29-32Roedenbeck,I.
A.
,Esswein,H.
,Khler,W.
2005.
Landschafts-zerschneidunginHessen.
–NaturschutzundLandschafts-planung37(10):293-300ContactIfyouhavequestionsorwouldliketoreceivecopiesoftheabovearticlespleasecontactDr.
JochenJaeger:E-mail:jochen.
jaeger@env.
ethz.
chPhone:+41(0)16320826Mail:ChairofNatureandLandscapeProtectionETH-Zentrum,CHNE21.
1CH–8092Zurich,Switzerlandwww:http://www.
nls.
env.
ethz.
ch/staff/jaeger.
htmlZurich,April2004,revisedversionJanuary2006MeasuringLandscapeFragmentationwiththeEffectiveMeshSizemeffbyJochenJaeger,HeideEssweinundHans-GeorgSchwarz-vonRaumerWhatissoproblematicaboutlandscapefragmentationFragmentationoflandscapesisamajorcauseofthealarminglossofspeciesinEurope(e.
g.
,duetotheisolationofpopulationsandtheseparationofcomple-mentarytypesofhabitat).
Inaddition,transportationinfrastructure,aleadingcauseoffragmentation,detri-mentallyaffectstherecreationalqualityoflandscapes(e.
g.
,duetonoisepollutionandthereductioninsizeandqualityofrecreationareas).
Asearlyas1985,theGermanGovernmentsetthepoliticalgoalofpreservinglargeun-fragmentedlow-trafficareas.
However,landscapefragmentationhasincreasedasrapidlyasbeforeduetonewroadsandrailroads,enhancedtrafficvolume,andurbandevelopment.
13.
0113.
6613.
9919.
4622.
9217.
819.
5820.
2420.
5122.
1424.
2631.
605101520253035192019401960198020002020withoutmunicipalroadswithmunicipalroadsmeff[km2]YearWhyistheeffectivemeshsizebetterthanothermethodsFormermeasuresoflandscapefragmentationareseverelylimitedintheirsensitivity(e.
g.
,thedensityoftrafficlinesneglectsthestructureofthetrafficnetworkwhichmaybeevenlydistributedorbundled;thetotalareaoflargeun-fragmentedlow-trafficareas>100km2neglectswhathappenstopatchesthataresmaller).
Thenewmethodhasimportantadvantages.
Itfulfilsallscientific,functional,andpragmaticrequirementsofenvironmentalindicators(Essweinetal.
2003),itissimpleandtransparentandhasanintuitiveinterpretation(seebelow).
Ittakesintoaccountallpatchesaccordingtotheirsize.
Furthermore,testingtheeffectivemeshsizeagainstasystematicsetofninescientificcriteriahasprovenitsaccuracyandsuitability(e.
g,lowsensitivitytosmallpatches,monotonousreactiontodifferentfrag-mentationphases,detectionofstructuraldifferences,andadvantageousmathematicalcharacteristics;seeJaeger2000,2002,2004).
Theeffectivemeshsizeissuitableforcomparingthedegreeoffragmentationoflandscapeswithdifferingtotalsizeandwithdifferingproportionsofurbandevelopmentandtrafficarea.
WhatdoesthevalueoftheeffectivemeshsizemeanTheeffectivemeshsizeisbasedontheprobabilityoftwopointschosenrandomlyinaregionwillbeconnected.
Themorebarriersinthelandscape,thelowertheprobabilitythatthetwopointswillbeconnected,andthelowertheeffectivemeshsize.
Ifalandscapeisfragmentedevenlyintopatchesallofsizemeff,thentheprobabilityofbeingconnectedisthesameasforthefragmentationpatternunderinvestigation.
Itcanalsobeinterpretedastheexpectedsizeofthepatchapointwillbelocatedinthatischosenrandomlyanywhereintheregion,orastheabilityoftwoanimalsofthesamespecies–placedrandomlyinaregion–tofindeachother.
Theprobabilityisconvertedintothesizeofapatch–theeffectivemeshsize–bymultiplyingitbythetotalsizeoftheregioninvestigated.
Thus,theunitofmeffisthatofarea(e.
g.
haorkm2).
Thevalueofmeffisbetween0(entirelyfragmentedordeveloped)andthesizeoftheregioninvestigated(un-fragmented).
Inthecasethatallpatchesareofthesamesize,theeffectivemeshsizeassumesthesizeofthepatchesand,therefore,oftheaveragepatchsize.
However,asthesizeofpatchesusuallydiffers,theeffectivemeshsizeisgenerallynotequaltotheaveragepatchsize.
ThemeasuremeffhasbeendevelopedbyJochenJaegerattheCenterofTechnologyAssessmentinBaden-Wurttemberg,Stuttgart,andattheETHZurich(Jaeger2000,2002,2004).
HowaretheseresultsusefulThedegreeoflandscapefragmentationisanimportantenvironmentalindicatorinthefieldsofbiodiversityandrecreationalqualityand,moregenerally,sustainability.
Inaddition,informationonthedegreeoflandscapefragmentationisrelevantinregionalplanningandfordecisionsaboutinfrastructureplacementorremoval.
Timeseriesshowhowstrongthecurrenttrendsareandwhattheirdirectionis.
WherehastheeffectivemeshsizebeenusedsofarmeffhasalreadybeenusedinBaden-Wurttemberg(seeexampleonotherside),Bavaria,Hesse,Thuringia,Saxony,Schleswig-Holstein,andSouthTyrol(Italy).
In2004,theGermanConferenceoftheMinistersoftheEnvironmentadoptedtherecommendationbytheGermanStateCommitteeCoreIndicatorstouseastandardizedprocedureforcalculatingmeffinallGermanstates.
ThemeffmethodhasalsobeenusedbytheEuropeanEnvironmentalAgency.
Currently,meffisbeingcalculatedinSwitzerlandandCanada.
Exampleofhowtocalculatetheeffectivemeshsize()222221totaleff.
.
.
.
.
.
1niAAAAAm+++++=wheren=numberofpatches,Atotal=totalareaoftheregioninvestigated,andAi=sizeofpatchi(i=1,…,n).
Example:Alandscapeisfragmentedbyhighwaysintothreepatches.
Theprobabilitythattworandomlychosenpointswillbeinpatch1(and,therefore,willbeconnected)is.
25.
05.
05.
02total1==AAThecorrespondingprobabilityis0.
252=0.
0625forbothpatches2and3.
Theprobabilitythatthetwopointswillbeinpatch1or2or3isthesumofthethreeprobabilitieswhichresultsin0.
375.
Multiplyingthisprobabilitybythetotalareaoftheregionfinallygivesthevalueoftheeffectivemeshsize:0.
375·4km2=1.
5km2.
A1A3A2Atotal=4km2
- Peterpatcha相关文档
- triggeredpatcha
- Smithiphanpatcha
- resolvedpatcha
- bardzoINSTALACJA PATCHA 2010 - EKSTRAKLASA PATCH DO PES 2010 - BenDJ
- patcha谁知到泰国歌手patcha的Cha pai mai ter 的歌词啊？？
- patcha泰国男歌手aof-supanat
FlashFXP FTP工具无法连接主机常见原因及解决办法
目前，我们都在用哪个FTP软件？喜欢用的是WinSCP，是一款免费的FTP/SFTP软件。今天在帮助一个网友远程解决问题的时候看到他用的是FlashFXP FTP工具，这个工具以前我也用过，不过正版是需要付费的，但是网上有很多的绿色版本和破解版本。考虑到安全的问题，个人不建议选择破解版。但是这款软件还是比较好用的。今天主要是遇到他的虚拟主机无法通过FTP连接主机，这里我就帮忙看看到底是什么问题。一...
RackNerd提供四款高配美国服务器促销活动低至月$189
RackNerd 商家给的感觉就是一直蹭节日热点，然后时不时通过修改配置结构不断的提供低价年付的VPS主机，不过他们家还是在做事的，这么两年多的发展，居然已经有新增至十几个数据中心，而且产品线发展也是比较丰富。比如也有独立服务器业务，不过在他们轮番的低价年付VPS主机活动下，他们的服务器估摸着销路不是太好的。这里，今天有看到RackNerd商家的独立服务器业务有促销。这次提供美国多个机房的高配独立...
易探云香港vps主机价格多少钱?香港云服务器主机租用价格
易探云香港vps主机价格多少钱?香港vps主机租用费用大体上是由配置决定的，我们选择香港vps主机租用最大的优势是免备案vps。但是，每家服务商的机房、配置、定价也不同。我们以最基础配置为标准，综合比对各大香港vps主机供应商的价格，即可选到高性能、价格适中的香港vps主机。通常1核CPU、1G内存、2Mbps独享带宽，价格在30元-120元/月。不过，易探云香港vps主机推出四个机房的优惠活动，...
patcha为你推荐
-
虚拟主机价格谁知道虚拟主机的价格？美国虚拟主机空间请经验丰富的高手给指导一下，我想选择适合个人网站应用的美国虚拟主机（空间），都是哪些服务商比较好？域名注册网网站域名申请，在那备案？英文域名中文域名与英文域名有什么区别，中文域名为什么贵？在搜索时哪个更有优势英文域名中文域名和英文域名有什么区别，越具体越好免费国内空间谁知道国内哪个免费空间好，要1GB的域名服务域名服务有何作用?如何设置?台湾vps虚拟主机，VPS，服务器，其中哪个流量最大？香港虚拟空间请大哥帮个忙，介绍可靠的香港虚拟主机？北京网站空间求永久免费的网站服务器！