奇点诸葛亮北伐史争议,是史学里两种弊端交汇的奇点（The controversy over Zhu Geliang´s Northern Expedition history is the singular point of the intersection of the two abuses in history）

诸葛亮北伐史争议,是史学里两种弊端交汇的奇点The controversyover Zhu Geliang' s Northern Expedition history is the singularpoint of the intersection of the two abuses in historyEvaluation of Zhu Geliang Chen Shou to the military, theadvantages and disadvantages are mentioned, but this morebalanced review, but was unable to meet those who admire ZhuGeliang as the military to Mount Taishan and the North Starpeople' s appetite, it throws a question: that of Zhu Geliangmilitary to extreme admiration is how it formed?

I think that this extreme mood first comes from people that ZhuGeliang in the country and integrity of admiration, China theancients have been looking for those who can not be met for the"saints" as their object of worship and spiritual sustenance,finally found a Zhu Geliang as his emotional object, so to himon the battlefield of failure, can hide to hide, "selectiveblindness" to"selective blindness", and the history of emotionaccumulation and people' s life can often feel pain havecomplementary resonance and push each other in Zhu Geliang, theson of Zhuge Zhan era has reached a peak of non rational. Whena Shu good governance, all the people think Zhuge is lookingtohost, the lackof theright toknow theblind people, a"dead"in the cases of Zhuge Zousheng zhong, Also the full performance,well known in this case may not know that Sima Yi Sima Yiridiculous, people' s ignorance is ridiculous!

In a number of historical literature has not yet lost time,especially in the era of Chen Shou Zhu Geliang, the militaryaspects of the data, records the historical victory for the JinDynasty rulers taboo and can be ignored, but the failure of the

historical records but will spread relatively safe becausethere is no way this concern. The worst enemy of all thesematerials is the extreme admiration for Zhu Geliang againstreason. This emotion is buried in the deep national soul of our"political sage" worship tradition. As long as our nation' shistorical and cultural heritage still exists, it will not bedestroyed or even be violated! It' s anti rational nature onlywith the Jin dynasty rule into the history of dust and pace togrow more and more strong!

Pei Songzhi played a decisive role in the development of thisemotion. After a large number of historical Yi lost, thisfavoritism to Zhu Geliang without arousing suspicion of peopleout of the historical text excerpt cut organization, become themain way to meet people, Zhu Geliang the last two expeditionof the battle at this time, ZhuGeliangrecorded the historicalheritage of balance of victory or defeat, from the original tothe "die" side to change the tilt to the "sage taboo" side. Onthe compilation of historical heritage, "Hui" harm generallyonly a succession of dynasties, but the harm of "sage taboo"is the continuation of thousands of years! "Die" is mostly forthe last ditch, the hypocrisy is often like exposed ambition,known to all; and "sage taboo" is a great evil like loyalty,like big Ning Xian, the history academic dignity and the rulesof the game have well ingrained destruction!

Pei Songzhi' s comment on the historical preservation of activepower, it can not be denied, but if you put aside the historicalloss donot speak (notYi Yi historical breaktimes is thecase) ,about the cut comment itself whether to do at least objectivelyand impartially, especially whether do basic attitude in the

stable suspicion on sensitive issues like this evaluation ofZhu Geliang' s military prowess, the answer is undoubtedlynegative.

Pei Songzhi' s note to be famous, mainly by the Chen ShouliangShi Caihua light, the so-called "yinrenchengshi", this says!Pei Songzhi still knows what Chen Shou and his primary andsecondary comparison in the history, academic and visualauthority. He often refers to one of Chen Shou' s characters as"authoritative data", which is one of the manifestations.However, Pei Songzhi is not a good time too observant ofconventional standards. attendant, he notes by chance to peddletheir own "contraband", why is it called "contraband"? Ofcourse, those who do not accord with the historical data, ispure comments and the choice of standard Pei Songzhi own thesethings not only most probably it did not actually happen, andthose not a little-known history does not meet, and even ChenShou written does not conform to the,

Pei Songzhi is all for spreading. In this sense, Pei notes liketoday those who secretly into serious newspapers there togetherdelivery illegal print, can not see the light, once at thecritical moment, the nature will be informal, who these thingsfully exposed!

Chen Shou on Zhu Geliang in the military defeat with attitudeand a more objective evaluation, but Pei Songzhi to sell theirown"contraband", will be evaluation of the failure of Chen Shou"cold treatment", on the other hand, the evaluation of victoryChen Shou and recording (Biography of Wang Ping shot Zhang He,Qupen) by heat treatment "and hype he organized" Sima Yi fears

Zhu Geliang "system, these techniques, is very limited, cancater to the history accomplishment and sense the opposite of"bright fans "taste, even Zhu Geliang Ma Su which cannot denymisuse is not" cold treatment "of the huge defeat, Pei Songzhito copy a sour, shy" Yuan Zi "Zhu Geliang" to prove how braveand able to fight, to hide, to reduce embarrassment, of course,Zhu Geliang is brave enough"History, Sima Yi had clearly giventhe reference answer:"bright if brave, when out of the mountainon the east of martial arts, Josie five cubits, then all thearmy without thing. " This text, from the Jin Dynasty by SunSheng, "spring and Autumn"Wei, Sun Sheng clank, for historicaldignity, sacrifice their lives, "Jinyang autumn", "salty at thetime that good history". This text was later included in theTang Dynasty "Jin Shu". But, as soon as he read these scathingremarks about Zhu Geliang, he felt uncomfortable and avoidedthe wrong thing.

Author: Lu teenager when 2007-6-400:24 reply to this statement-----------------------------------------------------------

---------------------

2, I recentlywrote a review of Sima Yi andZhuGeliangarticles,turn around

On the controversial issue of Zhu Geliang' s last two expedition,Chen Shou also failed to be completely objective, he failed toavoid as a knowledge of Shu people biased limitations,resulting in the "Three Kingdoms" biography of Wang Ping "-which uses indirect way of expressing themselves take the Shuarmy" victory beheaded three thousand "and" prisoners of Wei

is not admissible cut thousands of victory ". The independentresearch found that Chen Shou' s choice is also closely relatedto the historical stain of Wang Shen, the author of Wei' s book,Wang Shen' s official history book. But Chen Shou did not fallto the point of Pei Songzhi. He still had a basic academicconscience! For the content such as "bright many" about the"field the Shu army win" judgment, Chen Shou in the "ThreeKingdoms - Guohuai biography" objectively collected in thefield of Wei Shu army, defeating Kitahara over its preemptionstrategy records, points out the "Counter Strike" key words,on the other hand the Tang Dynasty, "Jin Shu" also point outof the war in the Wei Shu North on the outcome of"field"meaning:"with bright in the plot, former pro fight, not bright" (theauthor according to "shuijingzhu"records, the plot is North) .However, Pei Songzhi' s "Sima Yi fears Zhu Geliang" addicted todrinking, smoking,etc. system has an impressive array of, eager,for such a stumbling block, had to play deaf and dumb, can beblindfold! Pei Songzhi has broken his head, and thousands of"bright fans"have inherited all their drawbacks and have sadlydeveloped into "selective blindness. "".

The author believes that Zhu Geliang' s last two expeditionhistory, in the field of history, is the "die" and "theintersection of two kinds of drawbacks of sage taboo""singularity", the use of modern cosmology vocabulary called"singularity", because the battlefieldbecame the winner of theoffspring after change dynasties emperor, so the winner thehonorable not guilty of "Sima king", "emperor", and on thebattlefield has become a mixture of losers liufangqiangu,admired saints, genius, tragic hero. The same is the winnersand losers of achievement, are all reach the peak of perfection

will have a huge, incapable of further increase, violation ofthe realistic operation of the academic field of history!As for the time continuity and cultural accumulation of theinfringement, what will happen later?!

"Bright fans in the field of military anti sense, because theanti to be fully immersed, unprincipled point, reverse alsoaffects the evaluation objective and calm in the politicalaspect, resulting in a very easy to be fooled by the illusion,the illusion is that after the evaluation of Zhu Geliang' s allare positive, without any negative evaluation. Tang Changru,a professor of history at the Wuhan University, commented onZhu Geliang in an interviewwith reporters. "The first sentencewas a big mistake, " he said. "Zhu Geliang can be said to be aperfect man in the feudal society. ". From then until then, noone had ever been derogatory to Zhu Geliang. " A little calmpeople know that political Zhu Geliang shiguweihan Shu had theletter to denounce, how can say never derogatory term?! Frombelow, Mr. Tang' s comment on Chen Shou' s comments shows thatMr. Tang' s mistakes were caused by Pei Songzhi' s "coldtreatment"! This means Pei Songzhi put Chen Shou on the militarycan Zhu Geliang dressed as a"calm and derogatory comments notderogatory appearance, so that it should not be on the" lightfan "idolatry emotional reaction, while others avoid Lenovo tobattle records and contradiction Kitahara" field the Shu armytowin". Inaddition, Mr. Tangwas also in the Pei Songzhi quotethat "Yuan Zi" text strokes, the promotion in this period ofPei Songzhi is full of praise, silly ZhuGeliang rather bafflingwords, Mr. Tang only accept Chen Shou records and evaluationwhich is conducive to the image of Zhu Geliang information, even

negative information to resist change, finally "in fact, ChenShou on Zhu Geliang' s military can not belittle the absolute"conclusion, dignity and face history so, through aprofessionalexport have been destroyed. After Pei Songzhi recorded textwith praise to the "Three Kingdoms", although the records ofthe failure of Zhu Geliang put it down in black and white, butthe future generations would Leng will read"field the Shu armywin, Sima Yi is afraid to act, " Chen Shou Zhu Geliang of themilitary to all are praised "to understand, even Mr. Tang suchprofessionals will also read out as" Zhu Geliang is thedescendants of the extreme understanding no derogatory term"such as. If there is no light, dark with two disadvantages ofintersection of the singularity of the warp strength, reallyshould not be underestimated, and choice of Pei Zhu commentthinking history is more harm, must be vigilant! Maybe one day,when you talk about the history of the Three Kingdoms will makesimilar to Mr. Tang on Zhu Geliang as a stupid mistake, had beenpunctured, it turned out to be thoroughly discredited, thanksto Zhu Geliang' s staunch supporters of Mr. Pei Songzhi gave!The history of the Northern Expedition Zhu Geliang controversy,and Pei Songzhi carefully operation, three kinds of illusionabout favoritism nerviness must be point out and correct,otherwise, you may inevitably open completely mistaken:First, Pei Songzhi did not put everything that he didnot agreewith, although he orally declared that he had done so,especially for the derogatory words of Zhu Geliang. From thispoint he read "Yu -" Jin Shu "" and not to mention the praiseof Sima Yi invincible text can be confirmed.

Second, the Tang Dynasty "Jin Shu"Wei "contained thousands ofprisoners cut"victory isnot the so-called"historical records,why not see" Chen Shou' s not writing, as mentioned. Wei Jinperiod private history books rushed out of the old book onlyto have eighteen, there are a lot of the history in the Tangand Song Dynasties surviving today has lost all yi. Latergenerations did not read these history books, and asserted thatthe capture was nothing in history. How absurd and ridiculousit was! According to the author, may have included Wei"prisoners cut thousands" victory at least two old Jin Yu Luand pre.

Third, one thing toprove the historical record does not exist,is an extremely difficult thing, you will challenge manyqualifications tell much taller than you and witness the recentrecord, while Pei Songzhi is in the historical records to teachyou as a dish,

I'd like to follow you, just put a tear in the painted when itis not in the past, saying "to Zhu Geliang' s military ability,how could the how" the history of the corrupt nature of poison,do not know.