FIGUREhkcmd.exe
hkcmd.exe 时间:2021-04-14 阅读:(
)
TrendMicroIncorporatedResearchPaper2013FAKEMRATMalwareDisguisedasWindowsMessengerandYahoo!
MessengerBy:NartVilleneuveJessadelaTorreContentsIntroduction.
1Distribution.
2Installation.
3Backdoor.
3NetworkTrafficEncryption.
5Infrastructure.
7Conclusion.
81|FAKEMRATIntroductionTheperpetratorsoftargetedattacksaimtomaintainpersistentpresenceinatargetnetworkinordertoextractsensitivedatawhenneeded.
Tomaintainpersistentpresence,attackersseektoblendinwithnormalnetworktrafficanduseportsthataretypicallyallowedbyfirewalls.
Asaresult,manyofthemalwareusedintargetedattacksutilizetheHTTPandHTTPSprotocolstoappearlikewebtraffic.
However,whilethesemalwaredogiveattackersfullcontroloveracompromisedsystem,theyareoftensimpleandconfiguredtocarryoutafewcommands.
AttackersoftenuseremoteaccessTrojans(RATs),whichtypicallyhavegraphicaluserinterfaces(GUIs)andremotedesktopfeaturesthatincludedirectorybrowsing,filetransfer,andtheabilitytotakescreenshotsandactivatethemicrophoneandwebcameraofacompromisedcomputer.
AttackersoftenusepubliclyavailableRATslikeGh0st,PoisonIvy,Hupigon,andDRAT,and"closed-released"RATslikeMFCHunterandPlugX.
1However,thenetworktraffictheseRATsproduceiswell-knownandeasilydetectablealthoughattackersstillsuccessfullyusethem.
2Attackersalwayslookforwaystoblendtheirmalicioustrafficwithlegitimatetraffictoavoiddetection.
WefoundafamilyofRATsthatwecall"FAKEM"thatmaketheirnetworktrafficlooklikevariousprotocols.
SomevariantsattempttodisguisenetworktraffictolooklikeWindowsMessengerandYahoo!
Messengertraffic.
AnothervarianttriestomakethecontentofitstrafficlooklikeHTML.
WhilethedisguisestheRATsusearesimpleanddistinguishablefromlegitimatetraffic,theymaybejustgoodenoughtoavoidfurtherscrutiny.
1Gh0st:http://download01.
norman.
no/documents/ThemanyfacesofGh0stRat.
pdfandhttp://www.
mcafee.
com/ca/resources/white-papers/foundstone/wp-know-your-digital-enemy.
pdf;PoisonIvy:https://media.
blackhat.
com/bh-eu-10/presentations/Dereszowski/BlackHat-EU-2010-Dereszowski-Targeted-Attacks-slides.
pdf;Hupigon:http://www.
f-secure.
com/v-descs/backdoor_w32_hupigon.
shtml;DRAT:http://blog.
trendmicro.
com/trendlabs-security-intelligence/watering-holes-and-zero-day-attacks/;MFCHunter:http://blog.
trendmicro.
com/trendlabs-security-intelligence/japan-us-defense-industries-among-targeted-entities-in-latest-attack/;andPlugX:http://about-threats.
trendmicro.
com/us/webattack/112/Pulling+the+Plug+on+PlugX2http://www.
trendmicro.
com/cloud-content/us/pdfs/security-intelligence/white-papers/wp-detecting-apt-activity-with-network-traffic-analysis.
pdf2|FAKEMRATDistributionAllthreeversionsoftheFAKEMRATthatweinvestigatedweredistributedviaspear-phishingemailsusingsocialengineeringtoluretargetsintoexecutingamaliciousattachment.
Whileweobservedtheuseofdifferentthemes,thecontentoftheemailswerealwaysinterestingtopotentialtargets.
FIGURE1:Samplespear-phishingemailswithattachmentsthatdropFAKEMRATThemaliciousattachmentsweremostoftenMicrosoftWorddocumentswithcodethatexploitsthefollowingvulnerabilities:CVE-2010-3333:RTFStackBufferOverflowVulnerabilityaddressedinMicrosoftSecurityBulletinMS10-087.
3CVE-2012-0158:MSCOMCTL.
OCXRCEVulnerabilityaddressedinMicrosoftSecurityBulletinMS12-027.
4WealsofoundaMicrosoftExcelfilethatexploitsCVE-2009-3129,theExcelFeatheaderRecordMemoryCorruptionVulnerabilityaddressedinMicrosoftSecurityBulletinMS09-067.
5Wealsosawsamplesthatweresimplyexecutable(.
EXE)files.
3http://technet.
microsoft.
com/en-us/security/bulletin/MS10-0874http://technet.
microsoft.
com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms12-0275http://technet.
microsoft.
com/en-us/security/bulletin/MS09-0673|FAKEMRATInstallationAfterexploitation,an.
EXEfilepackedwithUPXisdropped.
6Afterinitiallydroppingthemaliciousfilenamedhkcmd.
exetothe%Temp%folder,themalwaretypicallycopiesitselfusingthename,tpframe.
exe,tothe%System%folder.
Itthenaddsthefollowingregistryentrytoenableitsautomaticexecutionateverysystemstartup:HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\policies\Explorer\runtpbar="%System%\tpframe.
exe"BackdoorThenetworktrafficthemalwareproducesisdesignedtolooklikeWindowsMessengertraffic.
MalwareofthistypewerediscussedonTwitter,notedbySonicWALL,andfoundtohavebeenactiveasfarbackasSeptember2009.
7However,itremainsunclearifalltheattacksthatusedthismalwarewereconnected.
ThemalicioustrafficbeginswithheaderssimilartoactualWindowsMessengertraffic:MSG5N130MIME-Version:1.
0However,beyondthis,youwillseethatthetrafficisnotvalidWindowsMessengertrafficbutmaybesufficientlydisguisedassuchtoescapefurtherscrutiny.
6UPXisafreetoolthatcompressesexecutablefiles.
However,itiscommonlyusedtopackmalwarefiles,seehttp://upx.
sourceforge.
net/formoredetails.
7https://twitter.
com/mikko/status/232851667446538241,https://www.
mysonicwall.
com/sonicalert/searchresults.
aspxev=article&id=464,andhttps://twitter.
com/diocyde/statuses/2328730236513361924|FAKEMRATFIGURE4:MalicioustrafficdisguisedasYahoo!
MessengertrafficFIGURE3:LegitimateWindowsMessengertrafficFIGURE2:MalicioustrafficdisguisedaslegitimateWindowsMessengertrafficComparedwithactualWindowsMessengertrafficshowninFigure3,itiseasytodistinguishthemalicioustrafficshowninFigure2.
Duringourinvestigationofthefake"WindowsMessenger"RAT,wefoundanotherversionthatattemptstodisguiseitsnetworktrafficasYahoo!
Messengertraffic.
ThenetworkcommunicationthisversionusesbeginswithYMSG,theYahoo!
Messengertrafficheader.
FIGURE5:LegitimateYahoo!
MessengertrafficHowever,thenetworktrafficshowninFigure4doesnotresemblelegitimateYahoo!
Messengertrafficbeyondtheuseoftheheader,YMSG.
ComparedwiththelegitimateYahoo!
MessengertrafficshowninFigure5,itiseasytodistinguishbetweenthetwo.
AthirdversionoftheFAKEMRATattemptstodisguisethenetworktrafficitproducesasHTML.
Themalicioustrafficbeginswithstringslike1.
.
56or12356.
88ThisvariantwasreferencedduringanincidentdocumentedbyAlienVaultinMarch2012inhttp://labs.
alienvault.
com/labs/index.
php/2012/alienvault-research-used-as-lure-in-targeted-attacks/.
5|FAKEMRATFIGURE6:MalicioustrafficdisguisedasHTMLtrafficThisisafairlyrudimentarydisguiseandoddbecauseyouwouldexpectHTMLtobetheresultofarequesttoawebserverandnotassomethingaclientwouldsendtoawebserver.
NetworkTrafficEncryptionThenetworkcommunicationbetweenthecompromisedcomputerandtheRATcontrollerisencrypted.
Theencryptionisthesameacrossvariantsanddoneatthebitlevel.
EachbyteisXOR-edbyeveryletterinthestring,YHCRA,androtated3bitstotherightaftereveryXORoperation.
Encryptingthecommunicationensuresthatthesuspiciousdatapassedbetweenthecompromisedhostandtheattackerscannotbeeasilyviewedinplaintext.
Thecommunicationcomesin1024-byteblobsofdatathatstartwiththe32-byteheader.
Itappearsthatattackersmayspecifyanykindoffakeheaderswithinthefirst32bytesinordertodisguisethesubsequentnetworktraffic.
Thefollowingbitsofinformationareinitiallysentbythecompromisedhostwhenthecommunicationstarts:UsernameComputernameOEMcodepageidentifierWhatlookslikeacampaigncodebutonlyforsomesamplesThecommandsarenotpreconfiguredasthemalwarereliesonthedatasentbytheserver.
Forinstance,whenaclientreceivesthecommand,0211,thissignifiesthatitshouldexecutetheaccompanyingdatainmemory.
6|FAKEMRATThefollowingarethecommandstheserverissuesandtheirmeanings:0211:Executecode.
0212:Reconnecttoreceivedata.
0213:Sleep,closesocket,andreconnect.
0214:Exit.
TodeterminetheRAT'scapabilities,weallowedtheattackerstoinfiltrateahoneypotcomputerandcapturedallofthenetworktrafficitgenerated.
Wedecryptedthenetworktrafficanddeterminedthecommandstheattackersused,whichinclude:CmdMana:CommandManagerallowsattackerstoexecuteshellcommands.
FileMan:FileManagerallowstheattackerstobrowsedirectories.
HostIn:HostInformationprovidesinformationaboutthecompromisedcomputer.
ProcMan:ProcessManagergivesattackersaccesstorunningprocesses.
RegMana:RegistryManagergivesattackersaccesstotheWindowsregistry.
Scree:Screentakesasnapshotofthedesktop.
ServiceMa:ServiceManagerallowsaccesstoservices.
Passwo:PasswordaccessesstoredpasswordslikethosesavedinInternetExplorer(IE).
UStea:Uploadsfilesfromacompromisedcomputer.
7|FAKEMRATInfrastructureTheWindowsMessengersamplesweanalyzedwereclusteredintofivegroupsthatdidnothaveoverlappinglinkages.
Fouroftheclusterswererelativelysmallandfocusedonfourdifferentdomains:vcvcvcvc.
dyndns.
orgzjhao.
dtdns.
netavira.
suroot.
com*.
googmail.
comThevcvcvcvc.
dyndns.
orgdomainisparticularlyinterestingbecausewealsofounditbeingusedasacommand-and-control(C&C)serverforProtux—awell-knownmalwarefamilythathasbeenusedinmanytargetedattacksovertheyears.
Wealsofoundthattheavira.
suroot.
comdomainusedasaC&Cserverforyetanothermalwarefamilywecall"cxgid.
"The*.
googmail.
comdomainwasslightlylargerandincludednameslikeapple12.
crabdance.
comandapple12.
co.
cc.
However,thelargestclusterrevolvedaroundthe*.
yourturbe.
orgdomainandoverlappedwiththeHTMLvariant.
WealsofoundsmallclustersoftheHTMLvariantthatrevolvedaroundthedomain,endless.
zapto.
org,whichwasdownloadedasasecond-stagemalwarebyProtux.
FIGURE7:FAKEMdomainsassociatedwiththeWindowsMessengerandHTMLvariants8|FAKEMRATMeanwhile,theYahoo!
Messengersamplesweanalyzedallaccessedfreeavg.
sytes.
net—adomainnamethatfrequentlyresolvedtodifferentIPaddresses.
FIGURE8:FAKEMdomainsassociatedwiththeYahoo!
MessengervariantThevarioussampleswecollectedappeartobelongtogroupsthatoverlappedalittle.
Thissuggeststhatratherthanbeingassociatedwithaparticularcampaign,theuseofvariousFAKEMRATscouldbedistributedamongmultiplethreatactors.
ConclusionKnowledgeoftheattacktools,techniques,andinfrastructureofadversariesiscriticalfordevelopingdefensivestrategies.
ThisresearchpaperexaminedthreevariantsofaRAT—FAKEM—thatattempttodisguisethenetworktraffictheyproducetostayundertheradar.
NowthatpopularRATslikeGh0standPoisonIvyhavebecomewell-knownandcaneasilybedetected,attackersarelookingformethodstoblendinwithlegitimatetraffic.
WhileitispossibletodistinguishthenetworktrafficFAKEMRATvariantsproduceforthelegitimateprotocolstheyaimtospoof,doingsointhecontextofalargenetworkmaynotbenoteasy.
TheRAT'sabilitytomaskthetrafficitproducesmaybeenoughtoprovideattackersenoughcovertosurvivelongerinacompromisedenvironment.
Fortunately,solutionslikeTrendMicroDeepDiscoverycanhelpnetworkadministratorsprotecttheirorganizationsfromattacksthatusetheFAKEMRATbydetectingthetrafficitsvariantsproduce.
TRENDMICROINCORPORATEDTrendMicroIncorporated(TYO:4704;TSE:4704),aglobalcloudsecurityleader,createsaworldsafeforexchangingdigitalinformationwithitsInternetcontentsecurityandthreatmanagementsolutionsforbusinessesandconsumers.
Apioneerinserversecuritywithover20years'experience,wedelivertop-rankedclient,serverandcloud-basedsecuritythatfitsourcustomers'andpartners'needs,stopsnewthreatsfaster,andprotectsdatainphysical,virtualizedandcloudenvironments.
Poweredbytheindustry-leadingTrendMicroSmartProtectionNetworkcloudcomputingsecurityinfrastructure,ourproductsandservicesstopthreatswheretheyemerge—fromtheInternet.
Theyaresupportedby1,000+threatintelligenceexpertsaroundtheglobe.
TRENDMICROINCORPORATED10101N.
DeAnzaBlvd.
Cupertino,CA95014U.
S.
tollfree:1+800.
228.
5651Phone:1+408.
257.
1500Fax:1+408.
257.
2003www.
trendmicro.
com2013byTrendMicroIncorporated.
Allrightsreserved.
TrendMicroandtheTrendMicrot-balllogoaretrademarksorregisteredtrademarksofTrendMicroIncorporated.
Allotherproductorcompanynamesmaybetrademarksorregisteredtrademarksoftheirowners.
运作了18年的德国老牌机房contabo在继去年4月开办了第一个美国数据中心(中部城市:圣路易斯)后立马在本月全新上马两个数据中心:纽约、西雅图。当前,为庆祝美国独立日,美国三个数据中心的VPS全部免除设置费,VPS本身的配置很高,价格适中,有较高的性价比!官方网站:https://contabo.com/en/SSD VPSKVM虚拟,纯SSD阵列,不限制流量,自带一个IPv4内存CPUSSD带...
捷锐数据官网商家介绍捷锐数据怎么样?捷锐数据好不好?捷锐数据是成立于2018年一家国人IDC商家,早期其主营虚拟主机CDN,现在主要有香港云服、国内物理机、腾讯轻量云代理、阿里轻量云代理,自营香港为CN2+BGP线路,采用KVM虚拟化而且单IP提供10G流量清洗并且免费配备天机盾可达到屏蔽UDP以及无视CC效果。这次捷锐数据给大家带来的活动是香港云促销,总共放量40台点击进入捷锐数据官网优惠活动内...
炭云怎么样?炭云(之前的碳云),国人商家,正规公司(哈尔滨桓林信息技术有限公司),主机之家测评介绍过多次。现在上海CN2共享IP的VPS有一款特价,上海cn2 vps,2核/384MB内存/8GB空间/800GB流量/77Mbps端口/共享IP/Hyper-v,188元/年,特别适合电信网络。有需要的可以关注一下。点击进入:炭云官方网站地址炭云vps套餐:套餐cpu内存硬盘流量/带宽ip价格购买上...
hkcmd.exe为你推荐
thinkphpthinkPHP怎么样呢linux防火墙设置怎么更改linux的防火墙设置?搜狗360360浏览器为什么不能让我自动登录了360退出北京时间在国外如何把手机时间调回到中国北京时间?filezilla_serverFileZilla无法连接服务器怎么解决支持httpyixingjia通配符的使用方法小型汽车网上自主编号申请网上选号自编号怎么选如何发帖子如何发表帖子联系我们代码农业银行代码
查询域名 视频空间租用 服务器评测 老左博客 godaddy 好玩的桌面 服务器架设 193邮箱 什么是刀片服务器 已备案删除域名 刀片式服务器 免费网页空间 购买国外空间 无限流量 空间购买 重庆电信服务器托管 atom处理器 国外免费网盘 winserver2008r2 服务器机柜 更多