PerformanceTest–BackupAssistZIP,WinZIP,andWinRARwww.
BackupAssist.
com1ThefollowingtestsweredesignedtocomparetheperformanceofBackupAssist'sZipEnginewithotherpopularZIPcompressionapplications:WinZIPandWinRAR.
Testswererunagainstthesamesetofdatatodeterminetheencryptionspeed,transferspeedandcompressionlevelofthedifferentZIPtechnologiesexamined.
HardwareusedWindowsServer2008withIntelQ9550(Quadcore2.
83GHz)processor,8.
00GBRAManddualSATAdrives.
SoftwareusedBackupAssistv6.
0.
0–availablefordownloadhere:http://www.
backupassist.
com/BackupAssist/download.
phpBackupswerecreatedusingtheBackupAssistZipEngine.
WinZIPv14.
5–availablefordownloadhere:http://www.
winzip.
com/downwz.
htmWinRARv3.
93–availablefordownloadhere:http://www.
rarlab.
com/download.
htmFilesetused2,207filestotaling1.
92GB:2,199fileswerelessthan100MBinsize5fileswerebetween100MBand200MBinsize.
2fileswerebetween200MBand1GBinsize.
FileswerebackedupfromonelocallyinstalledSATAdrivetoanotherSATAdriveonthesamemachine:TestresultsForthefollowingtests,2,207fileswereselectedfromalivecompanynetworkshareandcompressedusingthreedifferentZIPapplicationstoa.
ZIParchive.
Filesincludedtypicalofficedocuments,suchasMSWord,ExcelspreadsheetsandPowerPointpresentations,aswellasimages,PDFfiles,andlargerfileslike.
ISOimages.
Selectedsize(GB).
ZIParchivesize(GB)CompressionlevelCompressionratioTimetaken(h:mm:ss)Speed(GB/hr)BackupAssistv61.
921.
70Medium1.
13:10:00:34179WinZIP1.
921.
68Medium1.
14:10:01:4756WinRAR1.
921.
62Medium1.
19:10:06:1915IntheabovetablewecanseethatthecompressionratioachievedwasverysimilaracrossallZIPapplicationstested,butthatthetimetakentocompletethebackupvaried,withBackupAssistbeingconsiderablyfasterwhencompressingthesamesetofdata.
ZipTechnology(BackupAssistZip/WinZIP/WinRAR)SourcedrivedriveBackupdrivePerformanceTest–BackupAssistZIP,WinZIP,andWinRARwww.
BackupAssist.
com2EncryptiontimeThefollowinggraphshowshowpasswordencryptingthe.
ZIParchiveusingAES256-bitencryptioneffectsthetimetakentocompleteabackup.
Compressionwassetto0fortheseteststodeterminetheeffectofjustencryptiononbackuptimes.
TestingshowsthatencryptionhasarelativelyminimalimpactonbackuptimesforWinRARandBackupAssist(20%and40%respectively),butcausesa93%increaseincompressiontimeforWinZIP,increasingfrom47secondsto91seconds.
Throughput(GB/h)vs.
CompressionlevelThefollowinggraphshowshowthelevelofcompressioneffectsthespeedofthebackup.
ThesamesetofdatawascompressedusingNoCompression,MediumCompressionandHighCompressionsettings.
TestingshowsthatBackupAssist,whichincludeshighperformancemultithreadingarchitecture,outperformsbothWinZIPandWinRARwhencompressionisenabledbyupto164GB/houratMediumCompressionlevelsand109GB/houratHighCompressionlevels.
WhilethecompressedarchivescreatedbyWinZIPandWinRARweresmallerinsizethanthosecreatedbyBackupAssist,thedifferenceinsizewasminimal(seethefollowinggraph)anddidnotaccountfortheadditionaltimetakentocompletethebackup.
0:000:140:280:430:571:121:261:40Compressiontimewith256AESencryption,inminutes:secondsEncryptionenabledEncryptiondisabledBackupAssistv6WinZIPWinRAR050100150200250300350400NoCompressionMediumCompressionHighCompressionThroughput(GB/h)CompressionlevelusedBackupAssistv6WinZIPWinRARPerformanceTest–BackupAssistZIP,WinZIP,andWinRARwww.
BackupAssist.
com3Archivesize(GB)vs.
CompressionratioThefollowinggraphshowshowthelevelofcompressionappliedeffectsthesizeofthebackup.
ThesamesetofdatawascompressedusingNoCompression,MediumCompression(50%)andHighCompression(100%)settings.
TestingshowsthatWinRARoutperformsbothWinZIPandBackupAssistintermsofcreatingsmallercompressed.
ZIParchives.
However,whileBackupAssistarchiveswereapproximately6%largerthanthosecreatedusingWinRAR,backuptimesinBackupAssistwereupto11timesfaster,asshowinthegraphonpage2.
Summary/conclusionBackuptimeswithencryptionenabled:1.
WinRAR:20%increase,from21secondsto25seconds2.
BackupAssist:40%increase,from20secondsto28seconds3.
WinZip:93%increase,from47secondsto91seconds.
Throughput(GB/hour)withMediumCompression:1.
BackupAssist:180GB/hour2.
WinZip:56GB/hour3.
WinRAR:15GB/hourArchivesizewithMediumCompression::1.
WinRAR:1.
62GBarchive(1.
19:1compressionratio)2.
WinZip:1.
67GBarchive(1.
14:1compressionratio)3.
BackupAssist:1.
7GBarchive(1.
13:1compressionratio)Wecanseefromthesetestresultsthatintermsofspeed,BackupAssist'sZipEngine,whichbenefitsfrommultithreadingarchitecture,faroutperformsbothWinZipandWinRARbyuptoafactorof12whilestillofferinghighlycomparablecompressionratios,makingitaperfectsolutionforeventhemostdemandingbusinessbackups.
Andwithsupportfortapebackups,theBackupAssistZIPEngineissuitableforanyorganization:fromthesmallestbusinesswantingabasicsolution,tolargeenterprisesneedinglongtermdataarchivaltotape.
FormoredetailsonBackupAssist'sZipEnginevisitourZipproducttourpage,whichcontainsfurtherlinkstowhitepapers,brochuresandfactsheets:http://www.
backupassist.
com/BackupAssist/tour_Zip.
html1.
451.
51.
551.
61.
651.
71.
751.
81.
851.
91.
95NoCompressionMediumCompressionHighCompressionArchivesiez(GB)CompressionlevelusedBackupAssistv6WinZIPWinRAR
racknerd怎么样?racknerd最近发布了一些便宜美国服务器促销,包括大硬盘服务器,提供120G SSD+192TB HDD,有AMD和Intel两个选择,默认32G内存,1Gbps带宽,每个月100TB流量,5个IP地址,月付$599。价格非常便宜,需要存储服务器的朋友可以关注一下。RackNerd主要经营美国圣何塞、洛杉矶、达拉斯、芝加哥、亚特兰大、新泽西机房基于KVM虚拟化的VPS、...
HostKvm也发布了开年促销方案,针对香港国际和美国洛杉矶两个机房的VPS主机提供7折优惠码,其他机房业务提供8折优惠码。商家成立于2013年,提供基于KVM架构的VPS主机,可选数据中心包括日本、新加坡、韩国、美国、中国香港等多个地区机房,均为国内直连或优化线路,延迟较低,适合建站或者远程办公等。下面列出几款主机配置信息。美国洛杉矶套餐:美国 US-Plan1CPU:1core内存:2GB硬盘...
racknerd怎么样?racknerd美国便宜vps又开启促销模式了,机房优秀,有洛杉矶DC-02、纽约、芝加哥机房可选,最低配置4TB月流量套餐16.55美元/年,此外商家之前推出的最便宜的9.49美元/年套餐也补货上架,同时RackNerd美国AMD VPS套餐最低才14.18美元/年,是全网最便宜的AMD VPS套餐!RackNerd主要经营美国圣何塞、洛杉矶、达拉斯、芝加哥、亚特兰大、新...
winrar5.0为你推荐
易安信电脑系统朝阳分局犯罪嫌疑人标准化信息采集系统Max163支持ipad支持ipad支持ipad支持ipad尺寸(mm)操作區域手控photoshop技术什么是ps技术ipadwifiipad wifi信号差怎么办
万网虚拟主机 免费域名注册 西安电信测速 警告本网站 商务主机 空间论坛 河南m值兑换 yundun 贵阳电信测速 日本代理ip 阿里云手机官网 免费网络空间 云服务是什么意思 apnic 新疆服务器 移动王卡 htaccess ncp是什么 建站论坛 windowsserver2012 更多