correctedvcpd
vcpd 时间:2021-01-29 阅读:()
Reviewers'comments:Reviewer#1(RemarkstotheAuthor):Inthiswell-writtenpaper,theauthorsreportonobservationofananisotropicelectricresponseintheMoS2/graphenevanderWaals(vdW)heterostructuresinresponsetothedirectionoftheexternalelectricfield.
Theexperimentsseemcarefullyexecutedandareaccompaniedwiththeoreticalsimulationsandmodels.
Thefinding,astheauthorsstated,revealfundamentalknowledgeofthescreeningpropertiesofvdWheterostructuresandcouldleadtonoveldeviceapplicationssuchasoptoelectronicandplasmonicdevices.
Thepresentationismoreoverofaveryhighquality.
IseenoobjectiontothepublicationoftheworkinitspresentforminNatureCommunications.
However,IdocautiontheEditorthat,asanexperimentalist,Imighthavemisseddefectsinthetheoreticalsimulation/modelling.
Reviewer#2(RemarkstotheAuthor):TheauthorspresentaninterestingstudyoftheelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures,combiningadvancedexperimentalprobeswithfirst-principletheoryandaneasy-to-graspclassical-electrostaticapproach.
ThepaperpresentsaconvincingdemonstrationofdesignableasymmetricelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures.
ThiscouldbeofmuchutilityinnovelelectronicdevicesbasedonvanderWaalsheterostructures.
IbelievethepapercouldtriggerseveralstudiesofelectricalfieldscreeningofvdWheterostructuresandIamthereforeinclinedtorecommendthepaperforpublications.
However,Ihavetwoconcerns:1)Whilebothindicatingasymmetricelectricalfieldscreening,thelinkbetweentheoryandexperimentisquiteweak.
Thepaperwouldbemoreconvincingiftheauthorsmadeasimplequantitativemodel(dampedoscillatormodel)showinghowthecomputedasymmetricresponsegivesrisetothevariationintheEFMphase.
Aqualitativeagreementwithsomereasonablychosenparameterswouldbesufficienttomakeacompellingcase.
2)Thechoiceofxc-functionalisunclearandmaybeinappropriate.
DRSLLisrarelyusedtodenotethevanderWaalsdensityfunctionalofDionet.
al.
vdW-DFwouldbemorestandard.
NotealsothatvdW-DFisatotalxc-energyfunctional,itisnotvdW-"corrected"GGA.
Beyondnomenclature,thestandardpartnerforthenon-localcorrelationofvdW-DFisarevPBEexchangefunctional;however,thischoicesignificantlyoverestimateinter-layerseparations.
ThetextmightbeinterpretedasiftheauthorsusedthePBEexchangefunctionalincombinationwithvdW-DFnon-localcorrelation.
However,thisisnotarecommendedchoiceandshouldbeavoidedinstudieslikethisone.
ItwouldbemoreappropriatetouseforinstancevdW-DF-cxorrev-vdW-DF2.
FormoredetailsonvdW-DF,consultROPP78,066501,2015.
Thechoiceoffunctionaliscrucialforthespecificquantitativepredictionsasinter-layerseparationscouldhavegreatbearingonthescreeningproperties.
Minorcomments:Whynotusethewordasymmetricthroughout,andnotuseanisotropic.
Thereadermightbelieveitreferstoanisotropicsusceptibility,(i.
e.
dipoleforminginthexyplane),butthatisnotthetopicofthispaper.
Someabbreviationsareundefinied,inparticularintheexperimentalsection.
MaybealsoavoidusingGasabbreivationsbothinRamanspectroscopyandfordescribingthestructure.
Yourssincerely,Dr.
KristianBerland.
1ResponsetoReviewersNCOMMS-17-33374AWethankthereviewersfortheirdetailedattentiontoourworkandtheirsupportiveandinsightfulcomments.
Wehaveconsideredeachofthecommentscarefully,andprovidepoint-by-pointresponsestothembelowinbluetext.
Relevantchangestothemanuscriptarealsowritteningreentext.
Reviewer:#1Inthiswell-writtenpaper,theauthorsreportonobservationofananisotropicelectricresponseintheMoS2/graphenevanderWaals(vdW)heterostructuresinresponsetothedirectionoftheexternalelectricfield.
Theexperimentsseemcarefullyexecutedandareaccompaniedwiththeoreticalsimulationsandmodels.
Thefinding,astheauthorsstated,revealfundamentalknowledgeofthescreeningpropertiesofvdWheterostructuresandcouldleadtonoveldeviceapplicationssuchasoptoelectronicandplasmonicdevices.
Thepresentationismoreoverofaveryhighquality.
IseenoobjectiontothepublicationoftheworkinitspresentforminNatureCommunications.
However,IdocautiontheEditorthat,asanexperimentalist,Imighthavemisseddefectsinthetheoreticalsimulation/modelling.
Reviewer:#2TheauthorspresentaninterestingstudyoftheelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures,combiningadvancedexperimentalprobeswithfirst-principletheoryandaneasy-to-graspclassical-electrostaticapproach.
ThepaperpresentsaconvincingdemonstrationofdesignableasymmetricelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures.
ThiscouldbeofmuchutilityinnovelelectronicdevicesbasedonvanderWaalsheterostructures.
IbelievethepapercouldtriggerseveralstudiesofelectricalfieldscreeningofvdWheterostructuresandIamthereforeinclinedtorecommendthepaperforpublications.
However,Ihavetwoconcerns:1)Whilebothindicatingasymmetricelectricalfieldscreening,thelinkbetweentheoryandexperimentisquiteweak.
Thepaperwouldbemoreconvincingiftheauthorsmadeasimplequantitativemodel(dampedoscillatormodel)showinghowthecomputedasymmetricresponsegivesrisetothevariationintheEFMphase.
Aqualitativeagreementwithsomereasonablychosenparameterswouldbesufficienttomakeacompellingcase.
ResponseWethankthereviewerforhis/hercomments.
Firstandforemost,itshouldbeemphasizedthatthequantificationofanyEFMresultsisverycomplicatedandchallenging.
Thisismainlyduetotheunknowncapacitancetermdeterminedbythetipandsamplegeometryandthelong-rangenatureofelectrostaticforce.
Theprecisecalculationoftip-samplecapacitanceisonlyachievablebynumericalmethods,andseveralcalibratedparametersadhoc(seeGomilaetal.
Nanotechnology25,255702(2014)).
Suchanalysisisbeyondthescopeofthisproject.
However,wetriedtoestablishaqualitativeagreementbetweenthesimulationandEFMexperimentusingveryroughapproximations,asrequestedbythereviewer.
2WehaveincludedanewsetofdiscussionsanddataintheSupportingInformation(1.
QualitativeanalysisontheEFMresults)whereweusereasonableparameterstostrengthenthelinkbetweentheoryandexperiments.
Wecouldestimatethebehavioroftheelectricsusceptibilityasafunctionofthebiasforoneofoursystems,3LMoS2/4LGraphene.
ItcanbeseeninFigureS2thatthereisasystematicincrementoftheelectricsusceptibilityasthebiaspointstowardsMoS2,whichfollowsthebehaviorobservedinthesimulations.
Weaddedthefollowingsentencestothemanuscript:Page7,line152:"WetriedtoqualitativelyanalyzetheEFMresultstoestimatethechangeofelectricsusceptibility()ofthe3LMoS2/4LGrapheneheterostructure(seeSupportingInformation).
ThebehaviordisplaysanincrementofwiththebiaspointingtotheMoS2surface.
"Page9,line178:"…(Fig.
2(f)andFig.
S2intheSupportingInformation)…"2)Thechoiceofxc-functionalisunclearandmaybeinppropriate.
DRSLLisrarelyusedtodenotethevanderWaalsdensityfunctionalofDionet.
al.
vdW-DFwouldbemorestandard.
NotealsothatvdW-DFisatotalxc-energyfunctional,itisnotvdW-"corrected"GGA.
Beyondnomenclature,thestandardpartnerforthenon-localcorrelationofvdW-DFisarevPBEexchangefunctional;however,thischoicesignificantlyoverestimateinter-layerseparations.
ThetextmightbeinterpretedasiftheauthorsusedthePBEexchangefunctionalincombinationwithvdW-DFnon-localcorrelation.
However,thisisnotarecommendedchoiceandshouldbeavoidedinstudieslikethisone.
ItwouldbemoreappropriatetouseforinstancevdW-DF-cxorrev-vdW-DF2.
FormoredetailsonvdW-DF,consultROPP78,066501,2015.
Thechoiceoffunctionaliscrucialforthespecificquantitativepredictionsasinter-layerseparationscouldhavegreatbearingonthescreeningproperties.
ResponseWehaveexplicitlycheckedtheeffectofdifferentvanderWaals(vdW)densityfunctional(DF)onthemagnitudeoftheinterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2layers(dG-MoS2).
WehaveusedfourdifferentDF's,includingtheonesuggestedbythereviewer,e.
g.
BH.
WefoundminormodificationsbetweenthevdW-DFusedinourmanuscript(DRSLL)andotherswithdifferentchangesontheexchangepart.
ThemagnitudesofdG-MoS2differbyaround2%,whichalsocomparewellwithrecentvaluesreportedintheliterature1,2,3.
WealsocalculatedthechargedensityusingthesenewvdWfunctionalsandnegligiblevariationswereobserved.
ThisfullyjustifiesourchoiceofDRSLLinoursimulations.
WehaveincludedtheseresultsintheSupportingInformation(2.
InterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2sheets),inTableS1,FigureS4,togetherwithdiscussions,comparisonwithliteratureandnewreferences.
Wehaveincludedinpage28,line502,thefollowingsentencesreferringtothisanalysis:"WehaveexplicitlycheckedtheeffectofdifferentmodificationsontheexchangepartofthevdWdensityfunctionalontheinterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2asshowninTableS1intheSupportingInformation.
Minor3differenceswerefoundbetweenDRSLLandothervdWfunctionals,astheinterlayerdistancechangesbyaround2%.
Thisresultedinnegligiblevariationsonthechargedensity(FigureS4).
"Wehavealsocorrectedthetexttoshowthatweusedatotalenergyfunctionalassuggestedbythereviewer.
Inpage4,line70:"…weemployedquantummechanicalabinitiosimulationsbasedondensityfunctionaltheory(DFT)usingatotalenergyvdWfunctionaltoresolve…"Page8,line155:"…canbeexplainedattwotheoreticallevels,bothbyabinitiosimulationswithvdW-functionals,…"1.
Y.
Ma,Y.
Dai,M.
Guo,C.
NiuandB.
Huang.
GrapheneadhesiononMoS2monolayer:Anabinitiostudy.
Nanoscale3,3883(2011).
2.
W.
Hu,T.
Wang,R.
ZhangandJ.
Yang.
EffectsofinterlayercouplingandelectricfieldsontheelectronicstructuresofgrapheneandMoS2heterobilayers.
J.
Mat.
Chem.
C4,1776(2016).
3.
X.
LiuandZ.
Li.
ElectricFieldandStrainEffectonGraphene-MoS2HybridStructure:AbInitioCalculations.
J.
Phys.
Chem.
Lett.
6,3269(2015).
3)Minorcomments:Whynotusethewordasymmetricthroughout,andnotuseanisotropic.
Thereadermightbelieveitreferstoanisotropicsusceptibility,(i.
e.
dipoleforminginthexyplane),butthatisnotthetopicofthispaper.
Someabbreviationsareundefinied,inparticularintheexperimentalsection.
MaybealsoavoidusingGasabbreivationsbothinRamanspectroscopyandfordescribingthestructure.
ResponseWehavereviewedthemanuscriptthoroughlyusingtheword"asymmetric"insteadof"anisotropic"throughoutthetext.
Wehavealsodefinedunclearabbreviationsinthetext.
Page4,line87:"achievedbytworoundsofpolymethyl-methacrylate(PMMA)transfer…"4Page5,line99:"Thecorrespondingatomicforcemicroscopy(AFM)imageoftheheterostructureonAuisdisplayed…"Page6,line117:"VCPDisthecontactpotentialdifference(CPD)duetothemismatch…"Wehavemodifiedthroughoutthetexttheabbreviationof"graphene"by"G",andnowuse"graphene"insteadfordescribingthestructures.
REVIEWERS'COMMENTS:Reviewer#2(RemarkstotheAuthor):Theauthorshaveaddressedbothconcernsinasatisfactorymanner.
Irecommenditforpublication.
Theexperimentsseemcarefullyexecutedandareaccompaniedwiththeoreticalsimulationsandmodels.
Thefinding,astheauthorsstated,revealfundamentalknowledgeofthescreeningpropertiesofvdWheterostructuresandcouldleadtonoveldeviceapplicationssuchasoptoelectronicandplasmonicdevices.
Thepresentationismoreoverofaveryhighquality.
IseenoobjectiontothepublicationoftheworkinitspresentforminNatureCommunications.
However,IdocautiontheEditorthat,asanexperimentalist,Imighthavemisseddefectsinthetheoreticalsimulation/modelling.
Reviewer#2(RemarkstotheAuthor):TheauthorspresentaninterestingstudyoftheelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures,combiningadvancedexperimentalprobeswithfirst-principletheoryandaneasy-to-graspclassical-electrostaticapproach.
ThepaperpresentsaconvincingdemonstrationofdesignableasymmetricelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures.
ThiscouldbeofmuchutilityinnovelelectronicdevicesbasedonvanderWaalsheterostructures.
IbelievethepapercouldtriggerseveralstudiesofelectricalfieldscreeningofvdWheterostructuresandIamthereforeinclinedtorecommendthepaperforpublications.
However,Ihavetwoconcerns:1)Whilebothindicatingasymmetricelectricalfieldscreening,thelinkbetweentheoryandexperimentisquiteweak.
Thepaperwouldbemoreconvincingiftheauthorsmadeasimplequantitativemodel(dampedoscillatormodel)showinghowthecomputedasymmetricresponsegivesrisetothevariationintheEFMphase.
Aqualitativeagreementwithsomereasonablychosenparameterswouldbesufficienttomakeacompellingcase.
2)Thechoiceofxc-functionalisunclearandmaybeinappropriate.
DRSLLisrarelyusedtodenotethevanderWaalsdensityfunctionalofDionet.
al.
vdW-DFwouldbemorestandard.
NotealsothatvdW-DFisatotalxc-energyfunctional,itisnotvdW-"corrected"GGA.
Beyondnomenclature,thestandardpartnerforthenon-localcorrelationofvdW-DFisarevPBEexchangefunctional;however,thischoicesignificantlyoverestimateinter-layerseparations.
ThetextmightbeinterpretedasiftheauthorsusedthePBEexchangefunctionalincombinationwithvdW-DFnon-localcorrelation.
However,thisisnotarecommendedchoiceandshouldbeavoidedinstudieslikethisone.
ItwouldbemoreappropriatetouseforinstancevdW-DF-cxorrev-vdW-DF2.
FormoredetailsonvdW-DF,consultROPP78,066501,2015.
Thechoiceoffunctionaliscrucialforthespecificquantitativepredictionsasinter-layerseparationscouldhavegreatbearingonthescreeningproperties.
Minorcomments:Whynotusethewordasymmetricthroughout,andnotuseanisotropic.
Thereadermightbelieveitreferstoanisotropicsusceptibility,(i.
e.
dipoleforminginthexyplane),butthatisnotthetopicofthispaper.
Someabbreviationsareundefinied,inparticularintheexperimentalsection.
MaybealsoavoidusingGasabbreivationsbothinRamanspectroscopyandfordescribingthestructure.
Yourssincerely,Dr.
KristianBerland.
1ResponsetoReviewersNCOMMS-17-33374AWethankthereviewersfortheirdetailedattentiontoourworkandtheirsupportiveandinsightfulcomments.
Wehaveconsideredeachofthecommentscarefully,andprovidepoint-by-pointresponsestothembelowinbluetext.
Relevantchangestothemanuscriptarealsowritteningreentext.
Reviewer:#1Inthiswell-writtenpaper,theauthorsreportonobservationofananisotropicelectricresponseintheMoS2/graphenevanderWaals(vdW)heterostructuresinresponsetothedirectionoftheexternalelectricfield.
Theexperimentsseemcarefullyexecutedandareaccompaniedwiththeoreticalsimulationsandmodels.
Thefinding,astheauthorsstated,revealfundamentalknowledgeofthescreeningpropertiesofvdWheterostructuresandcouldleadtonoveldeviceapplicationssuchasoptoelectronicandplasmonicdevices.
Thepresentationismoreoverofaveryhighquality.
IseenoobjectiontothepublicationoftheworkinitspresentforminNatureCommunications.
However,IdocautiontheEditorthat,asanexperimentalist,Imighthavemisseddefectsinthetheoreticalsimulation/modelling.
Reviewer:#2TheauthorspresentaninterestingstudyoftheelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures,combiningadvancedexperimentalprobeswithfirst-principletheoryandaneasy-to-graspclassical-electrostaticapproach.
ThepaperpresentsaconvincingdemonstrationofdesignableasymmetricelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures.
ThiscouldbeofmuchutilityinnovelelectronicdevicesbasedonvanderWaalsheterostructures.
IbelievethepapercouldtriggerseveralstudiesofelectricalfieldscreeningofvdWheterostructuresandIamthereforeinclinedtorecommendthepaperforpublications.
However,Ihavetwoconcerns:1)Whilebothindicatingasymmetricelectricalfieldscreening,thelinkbetweentheoryandexperimentisquiteweak.
Thepaperwouldbemoreconvincingiftheauthorsmadeasimplequantitativemodel(dampedoscillatormodel)showinghowthecomputedasymmetricresponsegivesrisetothevariationintheEFMphase.
Aqualitativeagreementwithsomereasonablychosenparameterswouldbesufficienttomakeacompellingcase.
ResponseWethankthereviewerforhis/hercomments.
Firstandforemost,itshouldbeemphasizedthatthequantificationofanyEFMresultsisverycomplicatedandchallenging.
Thisismainlyduetotheunknowncapacitancetermdeterminedbythetipandsamplegeometryandthelong-rangenatureofelectrostaticforce.
Theprecisecalculationoftip-samplecapacitanceisonlyachievablebynumericalmethods,andseveralcalibratedparametersadhoc(seeGomilaetal.
Nanotechnology25,255702(2014)).
Suchanalysisisbeyondthescopeofthisproject.
However,wetriedtoestablishaqualitativeagreementbetweenthesimulationandEFMexperimentusingveryroughapproximations,asrequestedbythereviewer.
2WehaveincludedanewsetofdiscussionsanddataintheSupportingInformation(1.
QualitativeanalysisontheEFMresults)whereweusereasonableparameterstostrengthenthelinkbetweentheoryandexperiments.
Wecouldestimatethebehavioroftheelectricsusceptibilityasafunctionofthebiasforoneofoursystems,3LMoS2/4LGraphene.
ItcanbeseeninFigureS2thatthereisasystematicincrementoftheelectricsusceptibilityasthebiaspointstowardsMoS2,whichfollowsthebehaviorobservedinthesimulations.
Weaddedthefollowingsentencestothemanuscript:Page7,line152:"WetriedtoqualitativelyanalyzetheEFMresultstoestimatethechangeofelectricsusceptibility()ofthe3LMoS2/4LGrapheneheterostructure(seeSupportingInformation).
ThebehaviordisplaysanincrementofwiththebiaspointingtotheMoS2surface.
"Page9,line178:"…(Fig.
2(f)andFig.
S2intheSupportingInformation)…"2)Thechoiceofxc-functionalisunclearandmaybeinppropriate.
DRSLLisrarelyusedtodenotethevanderWaalsdensityfunctionalofDionet.
al.
vdW-DFwouldbemorestandard.
NotealsothatvdW-DFisatotalxc-energyfunctional,itisnotvdW-"corrected"GGA.
Beyondnomenclature,thestandardpartnerforthenon-localcorrelationofvdW-DFisarevPBEexchangefunctional;however,thischoicesignificantlyoverestimateinter-layerseparations.
ThetextmightbeinterpretedasiftheauthorsusedthePBEexchangefunctionalincombinationwithvdW-DFnon-localcorrelation.
However,thisisnotarecommendedchoiceandshouldbeavoidedinstudieslikethisone.
ItwouldbemoreappropriatetouseforinstancevdW-DF-cxorrev-vdW-DF2.
FormoredetailsonvdW-DF,consultROPP78,066501,2015.
Thechoiceoffunctionaliscrucialforthespecificquantitativepredictionsasinter-layerseparationscouldhavegreatbearingonthescreeningproperties.
ResponseWehaveexplicitlycheckedtheeffectofdifferentvanderWaals(vdW)densityfunctional(DF)onthemagnitudeoftheinterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2layers(dG-MoS2).
WehaveusedfourdifferentDF's,includingtheonesuggestedbythereviewer,e.
g.
BH.
WefoundminormodificationsbetweenthevdW-DFusedinourmanuscript(DRSLL)andotherswithdifferentchangesontheexchangepart.
ThemagnitudesofdG-MoS2differbyaround2%,whichalsocomparewellwithrecentvaluesreportedintheliterature1,2,3.
WealsocalculatedthechargedensityusingthesenewvdWfunctionalsandnegligiblevariationswereobserved.
ThisfullyjustifiesourchoiceofDRSLLinoursimulations.
WehaveincludedtheseresultsintheSupportingInformation(2.
InterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2sheets),inTableS1,FigureS4,togetherwithdiscussions,comparisonwithliteratureandnewreferences.
Wehaveincludedinpage28,line502,thefollowingsentencesreferringtothisanalysis:"WehaveexplicitlycheckedtheeffectofdifferentmodificationsontheexchangepartofthevdWdensityfunctionalontheinterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2asshowninTableS1intheSupportingInformation.
Minor3differenceswerefoundbetweenDRSLLandothervdWfunctionals,astheinterlayerdistancechangesbyaround2%.
Thisresultedinnegligiblevariationsonthechargedensity(FigureS4).
"Wehavealsocorrectedthetexttoshowthatweusedatotalenergyfunctionalassuggestedbythereviewer.
Inpage4,line70:"…weemployedquantummechanicalabinitiosimulationsbasedondensityfunctionaltheory(DFT)usingatotalenergyvdWfunctionaltoresolve…"Page8,line155:"…canbeexplainedattwotheoreticallevels,bothbyabinitiosimulationswithvdW-functionals,…"1.
Y.
Ma,Y.
Dai,M.
Guo,C.
NiuandB.
Huang.
GrapheneadhesiononMoS2monolayer:Anabinitiostudy.
Nanoscale3,3883(2011).
2.
W.
Hu,T.
Wang,R.
ZhangandJ.
Yang.
EffectsofinterlayercouplingandelectricfieldsontheelectronicstructuresofgrapheneandMoS2heterobilayers.
J.
Mat.
Chem.
C4,1776(2016).
3.
X.
LiuandZ.
Li.
ElectricFieldandStrainEffectonGraphene-MoS2HybridStructure:AbInitioCalculations.
J.
Phys.
Chem.
Lett.
6,3269(2015).
3)Minorcomments:Whynotusethewordasymmetricthroughout,andnotuseanisotropic.
Thereadermightbelieveitreferstoanisotropicsusceptibility,(i.
e.
dipoleforminginthexyplane),butthatisnotthetopicofthispaper.
Someabbreviationsareundefinied,inparticularintheexperimentalsection.
MaybealsoavoidusingGasabbreivationsbothinRamanspectroscopyandfordescribingthestructure.
ResponseWehavereviewedthemanuscriptthoroughlyusingtheword"asymmetric"insteadof"anisotropic"throughoutthetext.
Wehavealsodefinedunclearabbreviationsinthetext.
Page4,line87:"achievedbytworoundsofpolymethyl-methacrylate(PMMA)transfer…"4Page5,line99:"Thecorrespondingatomicforcemicroscopy(AFM)imageoftheheterostructureonAuisdisplayed…"Page6,line117:"VCPDisthecontactpotentialdifference(CPD)duetothemismatch…"Wehavemodifiedthroughoutthetexttheabbreviationof"graphene"by"G",andnowuse"graphene"insteadfordescribingthestructures.
REVIEWERS'COMMENTS:Reviewer#2(RemarkstotheAuthor):Theauthorshaveaddressedbothconcernsinasatisfactorymanner.
Irecommenditforpublication.
BeerVM1GB内存/VDSps端口1GB,350元/月
beervm是一家国人商家，主要提供国内KVM VPS，有河南移动、广州移动等。现在预售湖南长沙联通vds，性价比高。湖南长沙vps（长沙vds),1GB内存/7GB SSD空间/10TB流量/1Gbps端口/独立IP/KVM,350元/月，有需要的可以关注一下。Beervm长沙联通vps套餐：长沙联通1G青春版（预售）长沙联通3G标准版（预售）长沙联通3G（预售）vCPU：1vCPU：2vCPU...
lcloud零云：沪港IPLC,70元/月/200Mbps端口/共享IPv4/KVM;成都/德阳/雅安独立服务器低至400元/月起
lcloud怎么样?lcloud零云，UOVZ新开的子站，现在沪港iplc KVM VPS有端午节优惠，年付双倍流量，200Mbps带宽，性价比高。100Mbps带宽，500GB月流量，10个，512MB内存，优惠后月付70元，年付700元。另有国内独立服务器租用，泉州、佛山、成都、德阳、雅安独立服务器低至400元/月起！点击进入：lcloud官方网站地址lcloud零云优惠码：优惠码：bMVbR...
香港 E5-2650 16G 10M 900元首月 美国 E5-2660 V2 16G 100M 688元/月 华纳云
华纳云双11钜惠出海：CN2海外物理服务器终身价688元/月，香港/美国机房，免费送20G DDos防御，50M CN2或100M国际带宽可选，（文内附带测评）华纳云作为一家专业的全球数据中心基础服务提供商，总部在香港，拥有香港政府颁发的商业登记证明，APNIC 和 ARIN 会员单位。主营香港服务器、美国服务器、香港/美国OpenStack云服务器、香港高防物理服务器、美国高防服务器、香港高防I...
vcpd为你推荐
-
滚筒洗衣机和波轮洗衣机哪个好全自动洗衣机滚筒的和波轮的有什么区别，各有什么好处？传奇类手游哪个好什么传奇类手游好玩不坑钱？法兰绒和珊瑚绒哪个好珊瑚绒和法兰绒哪个暖和牡丹江教育云空间登录云端学习如何登录？qq空间登录不上qq空间登不上去yy空间登录yy空间怎么上传照片?辽宁联通网上营业厅中国移动辽宁营业厅360云查杀360手机安全卫士的云查杀功能是否可靠？强生月抛强生月抛隐形眼镜适合什么样的人群佩戴？广东联通彩铃中国联通炫铃怎么设置？