correctedvcpd
vcpd 时间:2021-01-29 阅读:()
Reviewers'comments:Reviewer#1(RemarkstotheAuthor):Inthiswell-writtenpaper,theauthorsreportonobservationofananisotropicelectricresponseintheMoS2/graphenevanderWaals(vdW)heterostructuresinresponsetothedirectionoftheexternalelectricfield.
Theexperimentsseemcarefullyexecutedandareaccompaniedwiththeoreticalsimulationsandmodels.
Thefinding,astheauthorsstated,revealfundamentalknowledgeofthescreeningpropertiesofvdWheterostructuresandcouldleadtonoveldeviceapplicationssuchasoptoelectronicandplasmonicdevices.
Thepresentationismoreoverofaveryhighquality.
IseenoobjectiontothepublicationoftheworkinitspresentforminNatureCommunications.
However,IdocautiontheEditorthat,asanexperimentalist,Imighthavemisseddefectsinthetheoreticalsimulation/modelling.
Reviewer#2(RemarkstotheAuthor):TheauthorspresentaninterestingstudyoftheelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures,combiningadvancedexperimentalprobeswithfirst-principletheoryandaneasy-to-graspclassical-electrostaticapproach.
ThepaperpresentsaconvincingdemonstrationofdesignableasymmetricelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures.
ThiscouldbeofmuchutilityinnovelelectronicdevicesbasedonvanderWaalsheterostructures.
IbelievethepapercouldtriggerseveralstudiesofelectricalfieldscreeningofvdWheterostructuresandIamthereforeinclinedtorecommendthepaperforpublications.
However,Ihavetwoconcerns:1)Whilebothindicatingasymmetricelectricalfieldscreening,thelinkbetweentheoryandexperimentisquiteweak.
Thepaperwouldbemoreconvincingiftheauthorsmadeasimplequantitativemodel(dampedoscillatormodel)showinghowthecomputedasymmetricresponsegivesrisetothevariationintheEFMphase.
Aqualitativeagreementwithsomereasonablychosenparameterswouldbesufficienttomakeacompellingcase.
2)Thechoiceofxc-functionalisunclearandmaybeinappropriate.
DRSLLisrarelyusedtodenotethevanderWaalsdensityfunctionalofDionet.
al.
vdW-DFwouldbemorestandard.
NotealsothatvdW-DFisatotalxc-energyfunctional,itisnotvdW-"corrected"GGA.
Beyondnomenclature,thestandardpartnerforthenon-localcorrelationofvdW-DFisarevPBEexchangefunctional;however,thischoicesignificantlyoverestimateinter-layerseparations.
ThetextmightbeinterpretedasiftheauthorsusedthePBEexchangefunctionalincombinationwithvdW-DFnon-localcorrelation.
However,thisisnotarecommendedchoiceandshouldbeavoidedinstudieslikethisone.
ItwouldbemoreappropriatetouseforinstancevdW-DF-cxorrev-vdW-DF2.
FormoredetailsonvdW-DF,consultROPP78,066501,2015.
Thechoiceoffunctionaliscrucialforthespecificquantitativepredictionsasinter-layerseparationscouldhavegreatbearingonthescreeningproperties.
Minorcomments:Whynotusethewordasymmetricthroughout,andnotuseanisotropic.
Thereadermightbelieveitreferstoanisotropicsusceptibility,(i.
e.
dipoleforminginthexyplane),butthatisnotthetopicofthispaper.
Someabbreviationsareundefinied,inparticularintheexperimentalsection.
MaybealsoavoidusingGasabbreivationsbothinRamanspectroscopyandfordescribingthestructure.
Yourssincerely,Dr.
KristianBerland.
1ResponsetoReviewersNCOMMS-17-33374AWethankthereviewersfortheirdetailedattentiontoourworkandtheirsupportiveandinsightfulcomments.
Wehaveconsideredeachofthecommentscarefully,andprovidepoint-by-pointresponsestothembelowinbluetext.
Relevantchangestothemanuscriptarealsowritteningreentext.
Reviewer:#1Inthiswell-writtenpaper,theauthorsreportonobservationofananisotropicelectricresponseintheMoS2/graphenevanderWaals(vdW)heterostructuresinresponsetothedirectionoftheexternalelectricfield.
Theexperimentsseemcarefullyexecutedandareaccompaniedwiththeoreticalsimulationsandmodels.
Thefinding,astheauthorsstated,revealfundamentalknowledgeofthescreeningpropertiesofvdWheterostructuresandcouldleadtonoveldeviceapplicationssuchasoptoelectronicandplasmonicdevices.
Thepresentationismoreoverofaveryhighquality.
IseenoobjectiontothepublicationoftheworkinitspresentforminNatureCommunications.
However,IdocautiontheEditorthat,asanexperimentalist,Imighthavemisseddefectsinthetheoreticalsimulation/modelling.
Reviewer:#2TheauthorspresentaninterestingstudyoftheelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures,combiningadvancedexperimentalprobeswithfirst-principletheoryandaneasy-to-graspclassical-electrostaticapproach.
ThepaperpresentsaconvincingdemonstrationofdesignableasymmetricelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures.
ThiscouldbeofmuchutilityinnovelelectronicdevicesbasedonvanderWaalsheterostructures.
IbelievethepapercouldtriggerseveralstudiesofelectricalfieldscreeningofvdWheterostructuresandIamthereforeinclinedtorecommendthepaperforpublications.
However,Ihavetwoconcerns:1)Whilebothindicatingasymmetricelectricalfieldscreening,thelinkbetweentheoryandexperimentisquiteweak.
Thepaperwouldbemoreconvincingiftheauthorsmadeasimplequantitativemodel(dampedoscillatormodel)showinghowthecomputedasymmetricresponsegivesrisetothevariationintheEFMphase.
Aqualitativeagreementwithsomereasonablychosenparameterswouldbesufficienttomakeacompellingcase.
ResponseWethankthereviewerforhis/hercomments.
Firstandforemost,itshouldbeemphasizedthatthequantificationofanyEFMresultsisverycomplicatedandchallenging.
Thisismainlyduetotheunknowncapacitancetermdeterminedbythetipandsamplegeometryandthelong-rangenatureofelectrostaticforce.
Theprecisecalculationoftip-samplecapacitanceisonlyachievablebynumericalmethods,andseveralcalibratedparametersadhoc(seeGomilaetal.
Nanotechnology25,255702(2014)).
Suchanalysisisbeyondthescopeofthisproject.
However,wetriedtoestablishaqualitativeagreementbetweenthesimulationandEFMexperimentusingveryroughapproximations,asrequestedbythereviewer.
2WehaveincludedanewsetofdiscussionsanddataintheSupportingInformation(1.
QualitativeanalysisontheEFMresults)whereweusereasonableparameterstostrengthenthelinkbetweentheoryandexperiments.
Wecouldestimatethebehavioroftheelectricsusceptibilityasafunctionofthebiasforoneofoursystems,3LMoS2/4LGraphene.
ItcanbeseeninFigureS2thatthereisasystematicincrementoftheelectricsusceptibilityasthebiaspointstowardsMoS2,whichfollowsthebehaviorobservedinthesimulations.
Weaddedthefollowingsentencestothemanuscript:Page7,line152:"WetriedtoqualitativelyanalyzetheEFMresultstoestimatethechangeofelectricsusceptibility()ofthe3LMoS2/4LGrapheneheterostructure(seeSupportingInformation).
ThebehaviordisplaysanincrementofwiththebiaspointingtotheMoS2surface.
"Page9,line178:"…(Fig.
2(f)andFig.
S2intheSupportingInformation)…"2)Thechoiceofxc-functionalisunclearandmaybeinppropriate.
DRSLLisrarelyusedtodenotethevanderWaalsdensityfunctionalofDionet.
al.
vdW-DFwouldbemorestandard.
NotealsothatvdW-DFisatotalxc-energyfunctional,itisnotvdW-"corrected"GGA.
Beyondnomenclature,thestandardpartnerforthenon-localcorrelationofvdW-DFisarevPBEexchangefunctional;however,thischoicesignificantlyoverestimateinter-layerseparations.
ThetextmightbeinterpretedasiftheauthorsusedthePBEexchangefunctionalincombinationwithvdW-DFnon-localcorrelation.
However,thisisnotarecommendedchoiceandshouldbeavoidedinstudieslikethisone.
ItwouldbemoreappropriatetouseforinstancevdW-DF-cxorrev-vdW-DF2.
FormoredetailsonvdW-DF,consultROPP78,066501,2015.
Thechoiceoffunctionaliscrucialforthespecificquantitativepredictionsasinter-layerseparationscouldhavegreatbearingonthescreeningproperties.
ResponseWehaveexplicitlycheckedtheeffectofdifferentvanderWaals(vdW)densityfunctional(DF)onthemagnitudeoftheinterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2layers(dG-MoS2).
WehaveusedfourdifferentDF's,includingtheonesuggestedbythereviewer,e.
g.
BH.
WefoundminormodificationsbetweenthevdW-DFusedinourmanuscript(DRSLL)andotherswithdifferentchangesontheexchangepart.
ThemagnitudesofdG-MoS2differbyaround2%,whichalsocomparewellwithrecentvaluesreportedintheliterature1,2,3.
WealsocalculatedthechargedensityusingthesenewvdWfunctionalsandnegligiblevariationswereobserved.
ThisfullyjustifiesourchoiceofDRSLLinoursimulations.
WehaveincludedtheseresultsintheSupportingInformation(2.
InterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2sheets),inTableS1,FigureS4,togetherwithdiscussions,comparisonwithliteratureandnewreferences.
Wehaveincludedinpage28,line502,thefollowingsentencesreferringtothisanalysis:"WehaveexplicitlycheckedtheeffectofdifferentmodificationsontheexchangepartofthevdWdensityfunctionalontheinterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2asshowninTableS1intheSupportingInformation.
Minor3differenceswerefoundbetweenDRSLLandothervdWfunctionals,astheinterlayerdistancechangesbyaround2%.
Thisresultedinnegligiblevariationsonthechargedensity(FigureS4).
"Wehavealsocorrectedthetexttoshowthatweusedatotalenergyfunctionalassuggestedbythereviewer.
Inpage4,line70:"…weemployedquantummechanicalabinitiosimulationsbasedondensityfunctionaltheory(DFT)usingatotalenergyvdWfunctionaltoresolve…"Page8,line155:"…canbeexplainedattwotheoreticallevels,bothbyabinitiosimulationswithvdW-functionals,…"1.
Y.
Ma,Y.
Dai,M.
Guo,C.
NiuandB.
Huang.
GrapheneadhesiononMoS2monolayer:Anabinitiostudy.
Nanoscale3,3883(2011).
2.
W.
Hu,T.
Wang,R.
ZhangandJ.
Yang.
EffectsofinterlayercouplingandelectricfieldsontheelectronicstructuresofgrapheneandMoS2heterobilayers.
J.
Mat.
Chem.
C4,1776(2016).
3.
X.
LiuandZ.
Li.
ElectricFieldandStrainEffectonGraphene-MoS2HybridStructure:AbInitioCalculations.
J.
Phys.
Chem.
Lett.
6,3269(2015).
3)Minorcomments:Whynotusethewordasymmetricthroughout,andnotuseanisotropic.
Thereadermightbelieveitreferstoanisotropicsusceptibility,(i.
e.
dipoleforminginthexyplane),butthatisnotthetopicofthispaper.
Someabbreviationsareundefinied,inparticularintheexperimentalsection.
MaybealsoavoidusingGasabbreivationsbothinRamanspectroscopyandfordescribingthestructure.
ResponseWehavereviewedthemanuscriptthoroughlyusingtheword"asymmetric"insteadof"anisotropic"throughoutthetext.
Wehavealsodefinedunclearabbreviationsinthetext.
Page4,line87:"achievedbytworoundsofpolymethyl-methacrylate(PMMA)transfer…"4Page5,line99:"Thecorrespondingatomicforcemicroscopy(AFM)imageoftheheterostructureonAuisdisplayed…"Page6,line117:"VCPDisthecontactpotentialdifference(CPD)duetothemismatch…"Wehavemodifiedthroughoutthetexttheabbreviationof"graphene"by"G",andnowuse"graphene"insteadfordescribingthestructures.
REVIEWERS'COMMENTS:Reviewer#2(RemarkstotheAuthor):Theauthorshaveaddressedbothconcernsinasatisfactorymanner.
Irecommenditforpublication.
Theexperimentsseemcarefullyexecutedandareaccompaniedwiththeoreticalsimulationsandmodels.
Thefinding,astheauthorsstated,revealfundamentalknowledgeofthescreeningpropertiesofvdWheterostructuresandcouldleadtonoveldeviceapplicationssuchasoptoelectronicandplasmonicdevices.
Thepresentationismoreoverofaveryhighquality.
IseenoobjectiontothepublicationoftheworkinitspresentforminNatureCommunications.
However,IdocautiontheEditorthat,asanexperimentalist,Imighthavemisseddefectsinthetheoreticalsimulation/modelling.
Reviewer#2(RemarkstotheAuthor):TheauthorspresentaninterestingstudyoftheelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures,combiningadvancedexperimentalprobeswithfirst-principletheoryandaneasy-to-graspclassical-electrostaticapproach.
ThepaperpresentsaconvincingdemonstrationofdesignableasymmetricelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures.
ThiscouldbeofmuchutilityinnovelelectronicdevicesbasedonvanderWaalsheterostructures.
IbelievethepapercouldtriggerseveralstudiesofelectricalfieldscreeningofvdWheterostructuresandIamthereforeinclinedtorecommendthepaperforpublications.
However,Ihavetwoconcerns:1)Whilebothindicatingasymmetricelectricalfieldscreening,thelinkbetweentheoryandexperimentisquiteweak.
Thepaperwouldbemoreconvincingiftheauthorsmadeasimplequantitativemodel(dampedoscillatormodel)showinghowthecomputedasymmetricresponsegivesrisetothevariationintheEFMphase.
Aqualitativeagreementwithsomereasonablychosenparameterswouldbesufficienttomakeacompellingcase.
2)Thechoiceofxc-functionalisunclearandmaybeinappropriate.
DRSLLisrarelyusedtodenotethevanderWaalsdensityfunctionalofDionet.
al.
vdW-DFwouldbemorestandard.
NotealsothatvdW-DFisatotalxc-energyfunctional,itisnotvdW-"corrected"GGA.
Beyondnomenclature,thestandardpartnerforthenon-localcorrelationofvdW-DFisarevPBEexchangefunctional;however,thischoicesignificantlyoverestimateinter-layerseparations.
ThetextmightbeinterpretedasiftheauthorsusedthePBEexchangefunctionalincombinationwithvdW-DFnon-localcorrelation.
However,thisisnotarecommendedchoiceandshouldbeavoidedinstudieslikethisone.
ItwouldbemoreappropriatetouseforinstancevdW-DF-cxorrev-vdW-DF2.
FormoredetailsonvdW-DF,consultROPP78,066501,2015.
Thechoiceoffunctionaliscrucialforthespecificquantitativepredictionsasinter-layerseparationscouldhavegreatbearingonthescreeningproperties.
Minorcomments:Whynotusethewordasymmetricthroughout,andnotuseanisotropic.
Thereadermightbelieveitreferstoanisotropicsusceptibility,(i.
e.
dipoleforminginthexyplane),butthatisnotthetopicofthispaper.
Someabbreviationsareundefinied,inparticularintheexperimentalsection.
MaybealsoavoidusingGasabbreivationsbothinRamanspectroscopyandfordescribingthestructure.
Yourssincerely,Dr.
KristianBerland.
1ResponsetoReviewersNCOMMS-17-33374AWethankthereviewersfortheirdetailedattentiontoourworkandtheirsupportiveandinsightfulcomments.
Wehaveconsideredeachofthecommentscarefully,andprovidepoint-by-pointresponsestothembelowinbluetext.
Relevantchangestothemanuscriptarealsowritteningreentext.
Reviewer:#1Inthiswell-writtenpaper,theauthorsreportonobservationofananisotropicelectricresponseintheMoS2/graphenevanderWaals(vdW)heterostructuresinresponsetothedirectionoftheexternalelectricfield.
Theexperimentsseemcarefullyexecutedandareaccompaniedwiththeoreticalsimulationsandmodels.
Thefinding,astheauthorsstated,revealfundamentalknowledgeofthescreeningpropertiesofvdWheterostructuresandcouldleadtonoveldeviceapplicationssuchasoptoelectronicandplasmonicdevices.
Thepresentationismoreoverofaveryhighquality.
IseenoobjectiontothepublicationoftheworkinitspresentforminNatureCommunications.
However,IdocautiontheEditorthat,asanexperimentalist,Imighthavemisseddefectsinthetheoreticalsimulation/modelling.
Reviewer:#2TheauthorspresentaninterestingstudyoftheelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures,combiningadvancedexperimentalprobeswithfirst-principletheoryandaneasy-to-graspclassical-electrostaticapproach.
ThepaperpresentsaconvincingdemonstrationofdesignableasymmetricelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures.
ThiscouldbeofmuchutilityinnovelelectronicdevicesbasedonvanderWaalsheterostructures.
IbelievethepapercouldtriggerseveralstudiesofelectricalfieldscreeningofvdWheterostructuresandIamthereforeinclinedtorecommendthepaperforpublications.
However,Ihavetwoconcerns:1)Whilebothindicatingasymmetricelectricalfieldscreening,thelinkbetweentheoryandexperimentisquiteweak.
Thepaperwouldbemoreconvincingiftheauthorsmadeasimplequantitativemodel(dampedoscillatormodel)showinghowthecomputedasymmetricresponsegivesrisetothevariationintheEFMphase.
Aqualitativeagreementwithsomereasonablychosenparameterswouldbesufficienttomakeacompellingcase.
ResponseWethankthereviewerforhis/hercomments.
Firstandforemost,itshouldbeemphasizedthatthequantificationofanyEFMresultsisverycomplicatedandchallenging.
Thisismainlyduetotheunknowncapacitancetermdeterminedbythetipandsamplegeometryandthelong-rangenatureofelectrostaticforce.
Theprecisecalculationoftip-samplecapacitanceisonlyachievablebynumericalmethods,andseveralcalibratedparametersadhoc(seeGomilaetal.
Nanotechnology25,255702(2014)).
Suchanalysisisbeyondthescopeofthisproject.
However,wetriedtoestablishaqualitativeagreementbetweenthesimulationandEFMexperimentusingveryroughapproximations,asrequestedbythereviewer.
2WehaveincludedanewsetofdiscussionsanddataintheSupportingInformation(1.
QualitativeanalysisontheEFMresults)whereweusereasonableparameterstostrengthenthelinkbetweentheoryandexperiments.
Wecouldestimatethebehavioroftheelectricsusceptibilityasafunctionofthebiasforoneofoursystems,3LMoS2/4LGraphene.
ItcanbeseeninFigureS2thatthereisasystematicincrementoftheelectricsusceptibilityasthebiaspointstowardsMoS2,whichfollowsthebehaviorobservedinthesimulations.
Weaddedthefollowingsentencestothemanuscript:Page7,line152:"WetriedtoqualitativelyanalyzetheEFMresultstoestimatethechangeofelectricsusceptibility()ofthe3LMoS2/4LGrapheneheterostructure(seeSupportingInformation).
ThebehaviordisplaysanincrementofwiththebiaspointingtotheMoS2surface.
"Page9,line178:"…(Fig.
2(f)andFig.
S2intheSupportingInformation)…"2)Thechoiceofxc-functionalisunclearandmaybeinppropriate.
DRSLLisrarelyusedtodenotethevanderWaalsdensityfunctionalofDionet.
al.
vdW-DFwouldbemorestandard.
NotealsothatvdW-DFisatotalxc-energyfunctional,itisnotvdW-"corrected"GGA.
Beyondnomenclature,thestandardpartnerforthenon-localcorrelationofvdW-DFisarevPBEexchangefunctional;however,thischoicesignificantlyoverestimateinter-layerseparations.
ThetextmightbeinterpretedasiftheauthorsusedthePBEexchangefunctionalincombinationwithvdW-DFnon-localcorrelation.
However,thisisnotarecommendedchoiceandshouldbeavoidedinstudieslikethisone.
ItwouldbemoreappropriatetouseforinstancevdW-DF-cxorrev-vdW-DF2.
FormoredetailsonvdW-DF,consultROPP78,066501,2015.
Thechoiceoffunctionaliscrucialforthespecificquantitativepredictionsasinter-layerseparationscouldhavegreatbearingonthescreeningproperties.
ResponseWehaveexplicitlycheckedtheeffectofdifferentvanderWaals(vdW)densityfunctional(DF)onthemagnitudeoftheinterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2layers(dG-MoS2).
WehaveusedfourdifferentDF's,includingtheonesuggestedbythereviewer,e.
g.
BH.
WefoundminormodificationsbetweenthevdW-DFusedinourmanuscript(DRSLL)andotherswithdifferentchangesontheexchangepart.
ThemagnitudesofdG-MoS2differbyaround2%,whichalsocomparewellwithrecentvaluesreportedintheliterature1,2,3.
WealsocalculatedthechargedensityusingthesenewvdWfunctionalsandnegligiblevariationswereobserved.
ThisfullyjustifiesourchoiceofDRSLLinoursimulations.
WehaveincludedtheseresultsintheSupportingInformation(2.
InterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2sheets),inTableS1,FigureS4,togetherwithdiscussions,comparisonwithliteratureandnewreferences.
Wehaveincludedinpage28,line502,thefollowingsentencesreferringtothisanalysis:"WehaveexplicitlycheckedtheeffectofdifferentmodificationsontheexchangepartofthevdWdensityfunctionalontheinterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2asshowninTableS1intheSupportingInformation.
Minor3differenceswerefoundbetweenDRSLLandothervdWfunctionals,astheinterlayerdistancechangesbyaround2%.
Thisresultedinnegligiblevariationsonthechargedensity(FigureS4).
"Wehavealsocorrectedthetexttoshowthatweusedatotalenergyfunctionalassuggestedbythereviewer.
Inpage4,line70:"…weemployedquantummechanicalabinitiosimulationsbasedondensityfunctionaltheory(DFT)usingatotalenergyvdWfunctionaltoresolve…"Page8,line155:"…canbeexplainedattwotheoreticallevels,bothbyabinitiosimulationswithvdW-functionals,…"1.
Y.
Ma,Y.
Dai,M.
Guo,C.
NiuandB.
Huang.
GrapheneadhesiononMoS2monolayer:Anabinitiostudy.
Nanoscale3,3883(2011).
2.
W.
Hu,T.
Wang,R.
ZhangandJ.
Yang.
EffectsofinterlayercouplingandelectricfieldsontheelectronicstructuresofgrapheneandMoS2heterobilayers.
J.
Mat.
Chem.
C4,1776(2016).
3.
X.
LiuandZ.
Li.
ElectricFieldandStrainEffectonGraphene-MoS2HybridStructure:AbInitioCalculations.
J.
Phys.
Chem.
Lett.
6,3269(2015).
3)Minorcomments:Whynotusethewordasymmetricthroughout,andnotuseanisotropic.
Thereadermightbelieveitreferstoanisotropicsusceptibility,(i.
e.
dipoleforminginthexyplane),butthatisnotthetopicofthispaper.
Someabbreviationsareundefinied,inparticularintheexperimentalsection.
MaybealsoavoidusingGasabbreivationsbothinRamanspectroscopyandfordescribingthestructure.
ResponseWehavereviewedthemanuscriptthoroughlyusingtheword"asymmetric"insteadof"anisotropic"throughoutthetext.
Wehavealsodefinedunclearabbreviationsinthetext.
Page4,line87:"achievedbytworoundsofpolymethyl-methacrylate(PMMA)transfer…"4Page5,line99:"Thecorrespondingatomicforcemicroscopy(AFM)imageoftheheterostructureonAuisdisplayed…"Page6,line117:"VCPDisthecontactpotentialdifference(CPD)duetothemismatch…"Wehavemodifiedthroughoutthetexttheabbreviationof"graphene"by"G",andnowuse"graphene"insteadfordescribingthestructures.
REVIEWERS'COMMENTS:Reviewer#2(RemarkstotheAuthor):Theauthorshaveaddressedbothconcernsinasatisfactorymanner.
Irecommenditforpublication.
Megalayer美国服务器CN2优化线路30M带宽3独立IP限时月299元
Megalayer 商家算是比较新晋的国内主机商，主要方向是美国、香港、菲律宾等机房的独立服务器为主，以及站群服务器和显卡服务器。同时也有新增价格并不是特别优惠的VPS云服务器。上午的时候有网友问问有没有CN2线路的美国独立服务器的，这里我推荐他选择Megalayer看看，目前也是有活动截止到月底的。Megalayer 商家创办2年左右时间，如果我们初次使用建议月付体验。目前在进行且可能截止到6月...
pia云低至20/月，七折美国服务器
Pia云是一家2018的开办的国人商家，原名叫哔哔云，目前整合到了魔方云平台上，商家主要销售VPS服务，采用KVM虚拟架构 ，机房有美国洛杉矶、中国香港和深圳地区，洛杉矶为crea机房，三网回程CN2 GIA，带20G防御，常看我测评的朋友应该知道，一般带防御去程都是骨干线路，香港的线路也是CN2直连大陆，目前商家重新开业，价格非常美丽，性价比较非常高，有需要的朋友可以关注一下。活动方案...
HostKvm（$4.25/月），俄罗斯CN2带宽大升级,俄罗斯/香港高防限量5折优惠进行中
HostKvm是一家成立于2013年的国外VPS服务商，产品基于KVM架构，数据中心包括日本、新加坡、韩国、美国、俄罗斯、中国香港等多个地区机房，均为国内直连或优化线路，延迟较低，适合建站或者远程办公等。本月，商家旗下俄罗斯、新加坡、美国、香港等节点带宽进行了大幅度升级，俄罗斯机房国内电信/联通直连，CN2线路，150Mbps(原来30Mbps)带宽起，目前俄罗斯和香港高防节点5折骨折码继续优惠中...
vcpd为你推荐
-
浮动利率和固定利率哪个好银行贷款是选固定利率好还是浮动利率宝来和朗逸哪个好朗逸 和 宝来 哪个好？苹果手机助手哪个好苹果手机助手哪个好，苹果手机助手推荐？杰士邦和杜蕾斯哪个好杰士邦的超薄款跟杜蕾斯的超薄款，哪个舒服点？股票软件哪个好股票软件哪个好，手机股票软件哪个好用qq空间登录网页版网页版QQ怎么登陆qq空间登录登陆进入QQ空间进去了叫登陆登陆了又叫登陆google广告申请谷歌广告怎么申请？dns服务器未响应dns 服务器未响应 怎么解决dns服务器什么意思DNS什么意思？