correctedvcpd
vcpd 时间:2021-01-29 阅读:()
Reviewers'comments:Reviewer#1(RemarkstotheAuthor):Inthiswell-writtenpaper,theauthorsreportonobservationofananisotropicelectricresponseintheMoS2/graphenevanderWaals(vdW)heterostructuresinresponsetothedirectionoftheexternalelectricfield.
Theexperimentsseemcarefullyexecutedandareaccompaniedwiththeoreticalsimulationsandmodels.
Thefinding,astheauthorsstated,revealfundamentalknowledgeofthescreeningpropertiesofvdWheterostructuresandcouldleadtonoveldeviceapplicationssuchasoptoelectronicandplasmonicdevices.
Thepresentationismoreoverofaveryhighquality.
IseenoobjectiontothepublicationoftheworkinitspresentforminNatureCommunications.
However,IdocautiontheEditorthat,asanexperimentalist,Imighthavemisseddefectsinthetheoreticalsimulation/modelling.
Reviewer#2(RemarkstotheAuthor):TheauthorspresentaninterestingstudyoftheelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures,combiningadvancedexperimentalprobeswithfirst-principletheoryandaneasy-to-graspclassical-electrostaticapproach.
ThepaperpresentsaconvincingdemonstrationofdesignableasymmetricelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures.
ThiscouldbeofmuchutilityinnovelelectronicdevicesbasedonvanderWaalsheterostructures.
IbelievethepapercouldtriggerseveralstudiesofelectricalfieldscreeningofvdWheterostructuresandIamthereforeinclinedtorecommendthepaperforpublications.
However,Ihavetwoconcerns:1)Whilebothindicatingasymmetricelectricalfieldscreening,thelinkbetweentheoryandexperimentisquiteweak.
Thepaperwouldbemoreconvincingiftheauthorsmadeasimplequantitativemodel(dampedoscillatormodel)showinghowthecomputedasymmetricresponsegivesrisetothevariationintheEFMphase.
Aqualitativeagreementwithsomereasonablychosenparameterswouldbesufficienttomakeacompellingcase.
2)Thechoiceofxc-functionalisunclearandmaybeinappropriate.
DRSLLisrarelyusedtodenotethevanderWaalsdensityfunctionalofDionet.
al.
vdW-DFwouldbemorestandard.
NotealsothatvdW-DFisatotalxc-energyfunctional,itisnotvdW-"corrected"GGA.
Beyondnomenclature,thestandardpartnerforthenon-localcorrelationofvdW-DFisarevPBEexchangefunctional;however,thischoicesignificantlyoverestimateinter-layerseparations.
ThetextmightbeinterpretedasiftheauthorsusedthePBEexchangefunctionalincombinationwithvdW-DFnon-localcorrelation.
However,thisisnotarecommendedchoiceandshouldbeavoidedinstudieslikethisone.
ItwouldbemoreappropriatetouseforinstancevdW-DF-cxorrev-vdW-DF2.
FormoredetailsonvdW-DF,consultROPP78,066501,2015.
Thechoiceoffunctionaliscrucialforthespecificquantitativepredictionsasinter-layerseparationscouldhavegreatbearingonthescreeningproperties.
Minorcomments:Whynotusethewordasymmetricthroughout,andnotuseanisotropic.
Thereadermightbelieveitreferstoanisotropicsusceptibility,(i.
e.
dipoleforminginthexyplane),butthatisnotthetopicofthispaper.
Someabbreviationsareundefinied,inparticularintheexperimentalsection.
MaybealsoavoidusingGasabbreivationsbothinRamanspectroscopyandfordescribingthestructure.
Yourssincerely,Dr.
KristianBerland.
1ResponsetoReviewersNCOMMS-17-33374AWethankthereviewersfortheirdetailedattentiontoourworkandtheirsupportiveandinsightfulcomments.
Wehaveconsideredeachofthecommentscarefully,andprovidepoint-by-pointresponsestothembelowinbluetext.
Relevantchangestothemanuscriptarealsowritteningreentext.
Reviewer:#1Inthiswell-writtenpaper,theauthorsreportonobservationofananisotropicelectricresponseintheMoS2/graphenevanderWaals(vdW)heterostructuresinresponsetothedirectionoftheexternalelectricfield.
Theexperimentsseemcarefullyexecutedandareaccompaniedwiththeoreticalsimulationsandmodels.
Thefinding,astheauthorsstated,revealfundamentalknowledgeofthescreeningpropertiesofvdWheterostructuresandcouldleadtonoveldeviceapplicationssuchasoptoelectronicandplasmonicdevices.
Thepresentationismoreoverofaveryhighquality.
IseenoobjectiontothepublicationoftheworkinitspresentforminNatureCommunications.
However,IdocautiontheEditorthat,asanexperimentalist,Imighthavemisseddefectsinthetheoreticalsimulation/modelling.
Reviewer:#2TheauthorspresentaninterestingstudyoftheelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures,combiningadvancedexperimentalprobeswithfirst-principletheoryandaneasy-to-graspclassical-electrostaticapproach.
ThepaperpresentsaconvincingdemonstrationofdesignableasymmetricelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures.
ThiscouldbeofmuchutilityinnovelelectronicdevicesbasedonvanderWaalsheterostructures.
IbelievethepapercouldtriggerseveralstudiesofelectricalfieldscreeningofvdWheterostructuresandIamthereforeinclinedtorecommendthepaperforpublications.
However,Ihavetwoconcerns:1)Whilebothindicatingasymmetricelectricalfieldscreening,thelinkbetweentheoryandexperimentisquiteweak.
Thepaperwouldbemoreconvincingiftheauthorsmadeasimplequantitativemodel(dampedoscillatormodel)showinghowthecomputedasymmetricresponsegivesrisetothevariationintheEFMphase.
Aqualitativeagreementwithsomereasonablychosenparameterswouldbesufficienttomakeacompellingcase.
ResponseWethankthereviewerforhis/hercomments.
Firstandforemost,itshouldbeemphasizedthatthequantificationofanyEFMresultsisverycomplicatedandchallenging.
Thisismainlyduetotheunknowncapacitancetermdeterminedbythetipandsamplegeometryandthelong-rangenatureofelectrostaticforce.
Theprecisecalculationoftip-samplecapacitanceisonlyachievablebynumericalmethods,andseveralcalibratedparametersadhoc(seeGomilaetal.
Nanotechnology25,255702(2014)).
Suchanalysisisbeyondthescopeofthisproject.
However,wetriedtoestablishaqualitativeagreementbetweenthesimulationandEFMexperimentusingveryroughapproximations,asrequestedbythereviewer.
2WehaveincludedanewsetofdiscussionsanddataintheSupportingInformation(1.
QualitativeanalysisontheEFMresults)whereweusereasonableparameterstostrengthenthelinkbetweentheoryandexperiments.
Wecouldestimatethebehavioroftheelectricsusceptibilityasafunctionofthebiasforoneofoursystems,3LMoS2/4LGraphene.
ItcanbeseeninFigureS2thatthereisasystematicincrementoftheelectricsusceptibilityasthebiaspointstowardsMoS2,whichfollowsthebehaviorobservedinthesimulations.
Weaddedthefollowingsentencestothemanuscript:Page7,line152:"WetriedtoqualitativelyanalyzetheEFMresultstoestimatethechangeofelectricsusceptibility()ofthe3LMoS2/4LGrapheneheterostructure(seeSupportingInformation).
ThebehaviordisplaysanincrementofwiththebiaspointingtotheMoS2surface.
"Page9,line178:"…(Fig.
2(f)andFig.
S2intheSupportingInformation)…"2)Thechoiceofxc-functionalisunclearandmaybeinppropriate.
DRSLLisrarelyusedtodenotethevanderWaalsdensityfunctionalofDionet.
al.
vdW-DFwouldbemorestandard.
NotealsothatvdW-DFisatotalxc-energyfunctional,itisnotvdW-"corrected"GGA.
Beyondnomenclature,thestandardpartnerforthenon-localcorrelationofvdW-DFisarevPBEexchangefunctional;however,thischoicesignificantlyoverestimateinter-layerseparations.
ThetextmightbeinterpretedasiftheauthorsusedthePBEexchangefunctionalincombinationwithvdW-DFnon-localcorrelation.
However,thisisnotarecommendedchoiceandshouldbeavoidedinstudieslikethisone.
ItwouldbemoreappropriatetouseforinstancevdW-DF-cxorrev-vdW-DF2.
FormoredetailsonvdW-DF,consultROPP78,066501,2015.
Thechoiceoffunctionaliscrucialforthespecificquantitativepredictionsasinter-layerseparationscouldhavegreatbearingonthescreeningproperties.
ResponseWehaveexplicitlycheckedtheeffectofdifferentvanderWaals(vdW)densityfunctional(DF)onthemagnitudeoftheinterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2layers(dG-MoS2).
WehaveusedfourdifferentDF's,includingtheonesuggestedbythereviewer,e.
g.
BH.
WefoundminormodificationsbetweenthevdW-DFusedinourmanuscript(DRSLL)andotherswithdifferentchangesontheexchangepart.
ThemagnitudesofdG-MoS2differbyaround2%,whichalsocomparewellwithrecentvaluesreportedintheliterature1,2,3.
WealsocalculatedthechargedensityusingthesenewvdWfunctionalsandnegligiblevariationswereobserved.
ThisfullyjustifiesourchoiceofDRSLLinoursimulations.
WehaveincludedtheseresultsintheSupportingInformation(2.
InterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2sheets),inTableS1,FigureS4,togetherwithdiscussions,comparisonwithliteratureandnewreferences.
Wehaveincludedinpage28,line502,thefollowingsentencesreferringtothisanalysis:"WehaveexplicitlycheckedtheeffectofdifferentmodificationsontheexchangepartofthevdWdensityfunctionalontheinterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2asshowninTableS1intheSupportingInformation.
Minor3differenceswerefoundbetweenDRSLLandothervdWfunctionals,astheinterlayerdistancechangesbyaround2%.
Thisresultedinnegligiblevariationsonthechargedensity(FigureS4).
"Wehavealsocorrectedthetexttoshowthatweusedatotalenergyfunctionalassuggestedbythereviewer.
Inpage4,line70:"…weemployedquantummechanicalabinitiosimulationsbasedondensityfunctionaltheory(DFT)usingatotalenergyvdWfunctionaltoresolve…"Page8,line155:"…canbeexplainedattwotheoreticallevels,bothbyabinitiosimulationswithvdW-functionals,…"1.
Y.
Ma,Y.
Dai,M.
Guo,C.
NiuandB.
Huang.
GrapheneadhesiononMoS2monolayer:Anabinitiostudy.
Nanoscale3,3883(2011).
2.
W.
Hu,T.
Wang,R.
ZhangandJ.
Yang.
EffectsofinterlayercouplingandelectricfieldsontheelectronicstructuresofgrapheneandMoS2heterobilayers.
J.
Mat.
Chem.
C4,1776(2016).
3.
X.
LiuandZ.
Li.
ElectricFieldandStrainEffectonGraphene-MoS2HybridStructure:AbInitioCalculations.
J.
Phys.
Chem.
Lett.
6,3269(2015).
3)Minorcomments:Whynotusethewordasymmetricthroughout,andnotuseanisotropic.
Thereadermightbelieveitreferstoanisotropicsusceptibility,(i.
e.
dipoleforminginthexyplane),butthatisnotthetopicofthispaper.
Someabbreviationsareundefinied,inparticularintheexperimentalsection.
MaybealsoavoidusingGasabbreivationsbothinRamanspectroscopyandfordescribingthestructure.
ResponseWehavereviewedthemanuscriptthoroughlyusingtheword"asymmetric"insteadof"anisotropic"throughoutthetext.
Wehavealsodefinedunclearabbreviationsinthetext.
Page4,line87:"achievedbytworoundsofpolymethyl-methacrylate(PMMA)transfer…"4Page5,line99:"Thecorrespondingatomicforcemicroscopy(AFM)imageoftheheterostructureonAuisdisplayed…"Page6,line117:"VCPDisthecontactpotentialdifference(CPD)duetothemismatch…"Wehavemodifiedthroughoutthetexttheabbreviationof"graphene"by"G",andnowuse"graphene"insteadfordescribingthestructures.
REVIEWERS'COMMENTS:Reviewer#2(RemarkstotheAuthor):Theauthorshaveaddressedbothconcernsinasatisfactorymanner.
Irecommenditforpublication.
Theexperimentsseemcarefullyexecutedandareaccompaniedwiththeoreticalsimulationsandmodels.
Thefinding,astheauthorsstated,revealfundamentalknowledgeofthescreeningpropertiesofvdWheterostructuresandcouldleadtonoveldeviceapplicationssuchasoptoelectronicandplasmonicdevices.
Thepresentationismoreoverofaveryhighquality.
IseenoobjectiontothepublicationoftheworkinitspresentforminNatureCommunications.
However,IdocautiontheEditorthat,asanexperimentalist,Imighthavemisseddefectsinthetheoreticalsimulation/modelling.
Reviewer#2(RemarkstotheAuthor):TheauthorspresentaninterestingstudyoftheelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures,combiningadvancedexperimentalprobeswithfirst-principletheoryandaneasy-to-graspclassical-electrostaticapproach.
ThepaperpresentsaconvincingdemonstrationofdesignableasymmetricelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures.
ThiscouldbeofmuchutilityinnovelelectronicdevicesbasedonvanderWaalsheterostructures.
IbelievethepapercouldtriggerseveralstudiesofelectricalfieldscreeningofvdWheterostructuresandIamthereforeinclinedtorecommendthepaperforpublications.
However,Ihavetwoconcerns:1)Whilebothindicatingasymmetricelectricalfieldscreening,thelinkbetweentheoryandexperimentisquiteweak.
Thepaperwouldbemoreconvincingiftheauthorsmadeasimplequantitativemodel(dampedoscillatormodel)showinghowthecomputedasymmetricresponsegivesrisetothevariationintheEFMphase.
Aqualitativeagreementwithsomereasonablychosenparameterswouldbesufficienttomakeacompellingcase.
2)Thechoiceofxc-functionalisunclearandmaybeinappropriate.
DRSLLisrarelyusedtodenotethevanderWaalsdensityfunctionalofDionet.
al.
vdW-DFwouldbemorestandard.
NotealsothatvdW-DFisatotalxc-energyfunctional,itisnotvdW-"corrected"GGA.
Beyondnomenclature,thestandardpartnerforthenon-localcorrelationofvdW-DFisarevPBEexchangefunctional;however,thischoicesignificantlyoverestimateinter-layerseparations.
ThetextmightbeinterpretedasiftheauthorsusedthePBEexchangefunctionalincombinationwithvdW-DFnon-localcorrelation.
However,thisisnotarecommendedchoiceandshouldbeavoidedinstudieslikethisone.
ItwouldbemoreappropriatetouseforinstancevdW-DF-cxorrev-vdW-DF2.
FormoredetailsonvdW-DF,consultROPP78,066501,2015.
Thechoiceoffunctionaliscrucialforthespecificquantitativepredictionsasinter-layerseparationscouldhavegreatbearingonthescreeningproperties.
Minorcomments:Whynotusethewordasymmetricthroughout,andnotuseanisotropic.
Thereadermightbelieveitreferstoanisotropicsusceptibility,(i.
e.
dipoleforminginthexyplane),butthatisnotthetopicofthispaper.
Someabbreviationsareundefinied,inparticularintheexperimentalsection.
MaybealsoavoidusingGasabbreivationsbothinRamanspectroscopyandfordescribingthestructure.
Yourssincerely,Dr.
KristianBerland.
1ResponsetoReviewersNCOMMS-17-33374AWethankthereviewersfortheirdetailedattentiontoourworkandtheirsupportiveandinsightfulcomments.
Wehaveconsideredeachofthecommentscarefully,andprovidepoint-by-pointresponsestothembelowinbluetext.
Relevantchangestothemanuscriptarealsowritteningreentext.
Reviewer:#1Inthiswell-writtenpaper,theauthorsreportonobservationofananisotropicelectricresponseintheMoS2/graphenevanderWaals(vdW)heterostructuresinresponsetothedirectionoftheexternalelectricfield.
Theexperimentsseemcarefullyexecutedandareaccompaniedwiththeoreticalsimulationsandmodels.
Thefinding,astheauthorsstated,revealfundamentalknowledgeofthescreeningpropertiesofvdWheterostructuresandcouldleadtonoveldeviceapplicationssuchasoptoelectronicandplasmonicdevices.
Thepresentationismoreoverofaveryhighquality.
IseenoobjectiontothepublicationoftheworkinitspresentforminNatureCommunications.
However,IdocautiontheEditorthat,asanexperimentalist,Imighthavemisseddefectsinthetheoreticalsimulation/modelling.
Reviewer:#2TheauthorspresentaninterestingstudyoftheelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures,combiningadvancedexperimentalprobeswithfirst-principletheoryandaneasy-to-graspclassical-electrostaticapproach.
ThepaperpresentsaconvincingdemonstrationofdesignableasymmetricelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures.
ThiscouldbeofmuchutilityinnovelelectronicdevicesbasedonvanderWaalsheterostructures.
IbelievethepapercouldtriggerseveralstudiesofelectricalfieldscreeningofvdWheterostructuresandIamthereforeinclinedtorecommendthepaperforpublications.
However,Ihavetwoconcerns:1)Whilebothindicatingasymmetricelectricalfieldscreening,thelinkbetweentheoryandexperimentisquiteweak.
Thepaperwouldbemoreconvincingiftheauthorsmadeasimplequantitativemodel(dampedoscillatormodel)showinghowthecomputedasymmetricresponsegivesrisetothevariationintheEFMphase.
Aqualitativeagreementwithsomereasonablychosenparameterswouldbesufficienttomakeacompellingcase.
ResponseWethankthereviewerforhis/hercomments.
Firstandforemost,itshouldbeemphasizedthatthequantificationofanyEFMresultsisverycomplicatedandchallenging.
Thisismainlyduetotheunknowncapacitancetermdeterminedbythetipandsamplegeometryandthelong-rangenatureofelectrostaticforce.
Theprecisecalculationoftip-samplecapacitanceisonlyachievablebynumericalmethods,andseveralcalibratedparametersadhoc(seeGomilaetal.
Nanotechnology25,255702(2014)).
Suchanalysisisbeyondthescopeofthisproject.
However,wetriedtoestablishaqualitativeagreementbetweenthesimulationandEFMexperimentusingveryroughapproximations,asrequestedbythereviewer.
2WehaveincludedanewsetofdiscussionsanddataintheSupportingInformation(1.
QualitativeanalysisontheEFMresults)whereweusereasonableparameterstostrengthenthelinkbetweentheoryandexperiments.
Wecouldestimatethebehavioroftheelectricsusceptibilityasafunctionofthebiasforoneofoursystems,3LMoS2/4LGraphene.
ItcanbeseeninFigureS2thatthereisasystematicincrementoftheelectricsusceptibilityasthebiaspointstowardsMoS2,whichfollowsthebehaviorobservedinthesimulations.
Weaddedthefollowingsentencestothemanuscript:Page7,line152:"WetriedtoqualitativelyanalyzetheEFMresultstoestimatethechangeofelectricsusceptibility()ofthe3LMoS2/4LGrapheneheterostructure(seeSupportingInformation).
ThebehaviordisplaysanincrementofwiththebiaspointingtotheMoS2surface.
"Page9,line178:"…(Fig.
2(f)andFig.
S2intheSupportingInformation)…"2)Thechoiceofxc-functionalisunclearandmaybeinppropriate.
DRSLLisrarelyusedtodenotethevanderWaalsdensityfunctionalofDionet.
al.
vdW-DFwouldbemorestandard.
NotealsothatvdW-DFisatotalxc-energyfunctional,itisnotvdW-"corrected"GGA.
Beyondnomenclature,thestandardpartnerforthenon-localcorrelationofvdW-DFisarevPBEexchangefunctional;however,thischoicesignificantlyoverestimateinter-layerseparations.
ThetextmightbeinterpretedasiftheauthorsusedthePBEexchangefunctionalincombinationwithvdW-DFnon-localcorrelation.
However,thisisnotarecommendedchoiceandshouldbeavoidedinstudieslikethisone.
ItwouldbemoreappropriatetouseforinstancevdW-DF-cxorrev-vdW-DF2.
FormoredetailsonvdW-DF,consultROPP78,066501,2015.
Thechoiceoffunctionaliscrucialforthespecificquantitativepredictionsasinter-layerseparationscouldhavegreatbearingonthescreeningproperties.
ResponseWehaveexplicitlycheckedtheeffectofdifferentvanderWaals(vdW)densityfunctional(DF)onthemagnitudeoftheinterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2layers(dG-MoS2).
WehaveusedfourdifferentDF's,includingtheonesuggestedbythereviewer,e.
g.
BH.
WefoundminormodificationsbetweenthevdW-DFusedinourmanuscript(DRSLL)andotherswithdifferentchangesontheexchangepart.
ThemagnitudesofdG-MoS2differbyaround2%,whichalsocomparewellwithrecentvaluesreportedintheliterature1,2,3.
WealsocalculatedthechargedensityusingthesenewvdWfunctionalsandnegligiblevariationswereobserved.
ThisfullyjustifiesourchoiceofDRSLLinoursimulations.
WehaveincludedtheseresultsintheSupportingInformation(2.
InterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2sheets),inTableS1,FigureS4,togetherwithdiscussions,comparisonwithliteratureandnewreferences.
Wehaveincludedinpage28,line502,thefollowingsentencesreferringtothisanalysis:"WehaveexplicitlycheckedtheeffectofdifferentmodificationsontheexchangepartofthevdWdensityfunctionalontheinterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2asshowninTableS1intheSupportingInformation.
Minor3differenceswerefoundbetweenDRSLLandothervdWfunctionals,astheinterlayerdistancechangesbyaround2%.
Thisresultedinnegligiblevariationsonthechargedensity(FigureS4).
"Wehavealsocorrectedthetexttoshowthatweusedatotalenergyfunctionalassuggestedbythereviewer.
Inpage4,line70:"…weemployedquantummechanicalabinitiosimulationsbasedondensityfunctionaltheory(DFT)usingatotalenergyvdWfunctionaltoresolve…"Page8,line155:"…canbeexplainedattwotheoreticallevels,bothbyabinitiosimulationswithvdW-functionals,…"1.
Y.
Ma,Y.
Dai,M.
Guo,C.
NiuandB.
Huang.
GrapheneadhesiononMoS2monolayer:Anabinitiostudy.
Nanoscale3,3883(2011).
2.
W.
Hu,T.
Wang,R.
ZhangandJ.
Yang.
EffectsofinterlayercouplingandelectricfieldsontheelectronicstructuresofgrapheneandMoS2heterobilayers.
J.
Mat.
Chem.
C4,1776(2016).
3.
X.
LiuandZ.
Li.
ElectricFieldandStrainEffectonGraphene-MoS2HybridStructure:AbInitioCalculations.
J.
Phys.
Chem.
Lett.
6,3269(2015).
3)Minorcomments:Whynotusethewordasymmetricthroughout,andnotuseanisotropic.
Thereadermightbelieveitreferstoanisotropicsusceptibility,(i.
e.
dipoleforminginthexyplane),butthatisnotthetopicofthispaper.
Someabbreviationsareundefinied,inparticularintheexperimentalsection.
MaybealsoavoidusingGasabbreivationsbothinRamanspectroscopyandfordescribingthestructure.
ResponseWehavereviewedthemanuscriptthoroughlyusingtheword"asymmetric"insteadof"anisotropic"throughoutthetext.
Wehavealsodefinedunclearabbreviationsinthetext.
Page4,line87:"achievedbytworoundsofpolymethyl-methacrylate(PMMA)transfer…"4Page5,line99:"Thecorrespondingatomicforcemicroscopy(AFM)imageoftheheterostructureonAuisdisplayed…"Page6,line117:"VCPDisthecontactpotentialdifference(CPD)duetothemismatch…"Wehavemodifiedthroughoutthetexttheabbreviationof"graphene"by"G",andnowuse"graphene"insteadfordescribingthestructures.
REVIEWERS'COMMENTS:Reviewer#2(RemarkstotheAuthor):Theauthorshaveaddressedbothconcernsinasatisfactorymanner.
Irecommenditforpublication.
趣米云月付460元，香港CN2云服务器VPS月付低至18元
趣米云早期为做技术起家，为3家IDC提供技术服务2年多，目前商家在售的服务有香港vps、香港独立服务器、香港站群服务器等，线路方面都是目前最优质的CN2，直连大陆，延时非常低，适合做站，目前商家正在做七月优惠活动，VPS低至18元，价格算是比较便宜的了。趣米云vps优惠套餐：KVM虚拟架构，香港沙田机房，线路采用三网(电信，联通，移动)回程电信cn2、cn2 gia优质网络，延迟低，速度快。自行封...
ShockHosting日本机房VPS测试点评
这个月11号ShockHosting发了个新上日本东京机房的邮件，并且表示其他机房可以申请转移到日本，刚好赵容手里有个美国的也没数据就发工单申请新开了一个，这里做个简单的测试，方便大家参考。ShockHosting成立于2013年，目前提供的VPS主机可以选择11个数据中心，包括美国洛杉矶、芝加哥、达拉斯、杰克逊维尔、新泽西、澳大利亚、新加坡、日本、荷兰和英国等。官方网站：https://shoc...
极光KVM美国美国洛杉矶元/极光kvmCN7月促销,美国CN2 GIA大带宽vps,洛杉矶联通CUVIP,14元/月起
极光KVM怎么样?极光KVM本月主打产品：美西CN2双向，1H1G100M，189/年!在美西CN2资源“一兆难求”的大环境下，CN2+大带宽 是很多用户的福音，也是商家实力的象征。目前，极光KVM在7月份的促销，7月促销,美国CN2 GIA大带宽vps,洛杉矶联通cuvip,14元/月起;香港CN2+BGP仅19元/月起，这次补货，机会，不要错过了。点击进入：极光KVM官方网站地址极光KVM七月...
vcpd为你推荐
-
绿色桌面背景图片求高清绿色风景桌面壁纸聚酯纤维和棉哪个好聚酯纤维和纯棉的相比，哪个好？麒麟820和980哪个好骁龙820和麒麟970哪个更强？华为p40和mate30哪个好Huawei Mate30 和 P40 哪个好？核芯显卡与独立显卡哪个好核心显卡和独立显卡哪个好海克斯皮肤哪个好lol100块抽11次的海克斯宝箱值得买吗oppo和vivo哪个好vivo好还是oppo手机好呢?网络机顶盒哪个好哪个品牌的网络机顶盒好用?视频软件哪个好安卓系统在线看视频软件哪个好yy空间登录怎样进入YY主播的空间