connectivity网易轻博客
网易轻博客 时间:2021-01-13 阅读:()
1ElectronicSupplementaryMaterialGeneticAssessmentofEnvironmentalFeaturesthatInfluenceDeerDispersal:ImplicationsforPrion-InfectedPopulationsAmyC.
Kelly,NohraE.
Mateus-Pinilla,WilliamBrown,MarilynO.
Ruiz,MarlisR.
Douglas,MichaelE.
Douglas,PaulShelton,TomBeissel,JanNovakofskiMicrosatelliteMarkersThefollowingmicrosatelliteswereemployedinthisstudy:BM1225,BM4107,CSN3,(Bishopetal.
1994),IGF-1(Kirkpatrick1992),OBCAM(Friesetal.
1993),OarFcb304(Buchananetal.
1993),RT20,RT23,RT27(Wilsonetal.
1997)andSrcrsp-10(Bhebheetal.
1994).
Welabeledforwardprimerswithfluorescentdyes(NED,HEX,FAM)andseparatedmicrosatellitefragmentsonanABI3730XLcapillarysequencer(AppliedBiosystems,FosterCity,CA).
WevisualizedmicrosatellitegenotypeswithGeneMapper(v.
4.
0;AppliedBiosystems,FosterCity,CA).
WeusedMicro-checker(v.
2.
2.
3;VanOosterhoutetal.
2004)toevaluategenotypingerrorsusingexpectedallelefrequenciesderivedunderHardy-Weinbergequilibrium(HWE).
FSTSurfaceProjectionWeusedtheSingleSpeciesGeneticDivergenceoptionwithintheGeneticLandscapesGIS(GeographicInformationSystem)ToolboxtoprojectasurfacefrompairwiseFSTvaluescalculatedbetweenall31studysites.
TheprogramfirstassociatedpairwiseFST2valueswithmidpointsbetweenallstudysitesandanetworkofnearestneighbors.
Spatialinterpolationwasthenperformedusinganinversedistanceweightedinterpolationalgorithmtoestimategeneticdistancesalongagridoverlaidonthestudyarea.
GeneticdistancesforallpointsacrossthegridwereinterpolatedsuchthatmidpointFSTvaluesthatwerespatiallycloserinfluencedtheestimatemoresothanthosethatweredistant.
Moredetailsontheinterpolationprocedurearedescribedinhttp://www.
werc.
usgs.
gov/productdetails.
aspxid=4017.
FRAGSTATSmetricsTheConnectanceIndex(CONNECT)measuresfunctionalconnectivity,meaningthatgridcellsinthedatathatdepictthetargetvariablearenotliterallyadjacent,buttheyareconsideredadjacent(orconnected)withinagiventhresholddistance.
Inthiscase,adjacencywasdefinedascellswithin100mofeachother.
Theuser-defined100mthresholdwasusedtoaccountforpotentialimprecisionofdataclassificationsatfinespatialresolutionsandtoprovideamorerealistic(i.
e.
,functional)depictionofhowdeermightinteractwiththelandscape.
Themetricitselfisapercentage,witharangeof0to100.
Morespecifically,itmeasuresthepercentageoftargetvariableadjacencies(connectionsorjoins)relativetoallpossibleadjacencies.
FormoreinformationontheConnectanceIndexsee:http://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Connectivity%20Metrics/Metrics/C122%20-%20CONNECT.
htm3ThePatchCohesionIndex(COHESION)isasecondmeasureofconnectivityofalandscapevariable.
Thismetrictakesintoaccountphysicaladjacency(withoutathreshold)incombinationwiththesizeandshapeofthepatches.
Takingforestasanexample,ahigherCOHESIONvaluewouldoccurinalandscapewithlargerandcompactpatchescomparedtoonewithsmallorconvolutedpatches.
FormoreinformationonthePatchCohesionIndexsee:http://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Connectivity%20Metrics/Metrics/C121%20-%20COHESION.
htmTheClumpinessIndex(CLUMPY)isametricindicatinghowcontiguousordispersedaretheadjacentpatchesofalandscapevariable.
AhighervalueofCLUMPYwouldoccurifseveralpatcheswerelocatedclosetogetherratherthanbeingmoreuniformlydistributed.
FormoreinformationontheClumpinessIndex(CLUMPY)seehttp://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Contagion%20-%20Interspersion%20Metrics/Metrics/C115%20-%20CLUMPY.
htmThePerimeter-AreaFractalDimension(PAFRAC)isashapemetricdeterminedacrossarangeofspatialscales.
PARFRACislowforpatcheswithsimpleperimetersandincreasesforpatchshapeswithhighlyconvolutedperimeters.
FormoreinformationonthePerimeter-AreaFractalDimensionIndex(PAFRAC),seehttp://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Shape%20Metrics/Metrics/C23%20-%20PAFRAC.
htm.
Multivariatelinearregressionanalysis4DescriptionandsourceoflandscapevariablesincludedinmultivariateregressionanalysisarelistedinTableS1.
Topreventoverlyinfluentialobservationsfrombiasingourmodels,weusedleveragescores,Cook'sDvalues,andstandardizedinfluencevaluestoidentifyoutliers(Kieetal.
2002;ChatterjeeandHadi2009;Anlaufetal.
2011).
Leveragescoresidentifyobservationsthatresultinlargechangesinregressionlinefitupontheirdeletion.
Wecalculatedleverage(pi)accordingtoChatterjeeandHadi(1986)andconsideredobservationsoverlyinfluentialwhenpi>2p/N(p=numberofindependentvariablesinthemodel;N=numberofobservations).
Cook'sDvalueswerecalculatedaccordingtoCook(1977)andcomparedtoanFdistributionwithα=0.
05and(N-p)degreesoffreedom.
AllCook'sDvalues>thecriticalFvaluewereconsideredoverlyinfluentialandremovedfromthemodel(Cook1977).
LeveragescoresandCook'sDallowedustodeterminetheeffectsofoutliersontheoverallmodel,butstandardizedinfluencevalues(DFFITS)allowedustoexaminetheinfluenceofeachobservationonitspredictedvalue.
WecalculatedDFFITSaccordingtoChatterjeeandHadi(1986)andeliminatedobservationsyieldingvalues>2)/(Np(ChatterjeeandHadi1986).
Usingthesethreecriteria,weidentifiedthirteenobservationsoutof465(2.
8%)thatwereoutliersandafterstringentlyevaluatingtheirbasis(Motulsky2010),weomittedthemduringfurtheranalyses.
Themajorityoftheoutliersremoved(7/13)involvedstudysitesthathadrelativelylowsamplesizes.
Threeofthirteenoutliersinvolvedpairwisecomparisonswithstudysite27,thoughtheremainingtenoutliersappearedtoinvolvestudysitesthatwererandomlydistributedgeographically.
AsingleoutlierhadthehighestFSTvalueobserved,thoughtheremainingoutliersdidnotexhibitunusuallyhighorlowFSTvaluesascomparedtotherestofthe5dataset.
WecomparedvaluesofdependentvariablesofoutlierstovaluesfortherestofthedatabyexaminingboxplotsandplottingdependentvariablesagainstFSTvalues(datanotshown).
Trendsinthedistributionofvaluesfordependentvariablewerenotapparentinoutliersascomparedtotherestofthedata.
Whentwoormorelandscapevariableswerehighlycorrelated(Pearson'srP>0.
7),thepredictorwiththelowestpartialcorrelationinthefullmodelwasremoved.
RemovinglandscapevariableswithrP>0.
7(n=7)resultedinagenerallackofcollinearityamongpredictorsasdeterminedbyvarianceinflationfactors.
CorrelatedpredictorsthatwereremovedfromthemodelarelistedinTableS2.
Weusedvarianceinflationfactors(VIF)toevaluatetheincreaseinvarianceforestimatedregressioncoefficientsresultingfromcollinearpredictors,withVIF>10indicativeofhighmulticollinearity(Kutneretal.
2004).
Afterremovinghighlycorrelatedvariables,wecalculatedvarianceinflationfactorsforindependentvariablesandfoundthatthevarianceofestimatedregressioncoefficientswasnotsubstantiallyincreasedbycollinearpredictorsasVIFvaluesforallpredictorswere0.
7thatweresubsequentlyremovedfromthemodel.
VariableCorrelateDirectionofCorrelationVariableRemoved*%GrasslandSlope+%GrasslandForestCONNECTDevelopedCONNECT+ForestCONNECT%GrasslandGrasslandCONNECT-%GrasslandForestCONNECTGrasslandCONNECT+ForestCONNECTForestCONNECTWaterCONNECT+ForestCONNECTAgricultureCLUMPY%Agriculture-AgricultureCLUMPY%RiparianSlope+Slope%GrasslandForestCLUMPY-%GrasslandForestCONNECTDistance-ForestCONNECTSlopeGrasslandCOHESION+SlopeDevelopedCONNECTGrasslandCONNECT+DevelopedCONNECTGrasslandPAFRACSlope+SlopeDevelopedCONNECTWaterCONNECT+DevelopedCONNECT%GrasslandAgricultureCLUMPY-%Grassland%GrasslandAgriculturePAFRAC+%GrasslandDistanceDevelopedCONNECT-DevelopedCONNECTForestCONNECTWaterCONNECT+ForestCONNECT%AgricultureAgricultureCOHESION+AgricultureCOHESIONWaterCOHESIONWaterCLUMPY+WaterCLUMPY*thepredictorwiththelowestpartialcorrelationinthefullmodelwasremoved.
10TableS3.
Percentsignificant(P<0.
05)localr,rangeoflocalr,andmeanlocalrforfive,15and25nearestneighborsingroupsofwhite-taileddeerinnorthernIllinois(NIL),DuPageCounty(DuP),andWisconsin(WI).
GroupNumberofNearestNeighbors51525%P<0.
051MaxrMeanr%P<0.
051MaxrMeanr%P<0.
051MaxrMeanrAdultMales5.
70.
160.
134.
40.
110.
087.
90.
080.
06MaleYearlings7.
00.
280.
1711.
60.
180.
0914.
10.
120.
06MaleFawns9.
30.
190.
1511.
30.
090.
078.
20.
060.
05AdultMalesandFemaleYearlings6.
40.
270.
147.
60.
120.
088.
10.
090.
06AdultFemales14.
70.
320.
1618.
80.
240.
0920.
50.
150.
07FemaleYearlings5.
70.
160.
124.
80.
110.
074.
80.
070.
05FemaleFawns17.
10.
240.
1415.
20.
130.
0919.
50.
090.
06AdultFemalesandFawns16.
00.
310.
1622.
80.
230.
1024.
50.
190.
081NumberofautocorrelationcoefficientsthatweresignificantatP<0.
05dividedbythetotalnumberautocorrelationcoefficientscalculatedforeachgroup*100.
Includingonlysignificantlocalrvalues.
Kelly,NohraE.
Mateus-Pinilla,WilliamBrown,MarilynO.
Ruiz,MarlisR.
Douglas,MichaelE.
Douglas,PaulShelton,TomBeissel,JanNovakofskiMicrosatelliteMarkersThefollowingmicrosatelliteswereemployedinthisstudy:BM1225,BM4107,CSN3,(Bishopetal.
1994),IGF-1(Kirkpatrick1992),OBCAM(Friesetal.
1993),OarFcb304(Buchananetal.
1993),RT20,RT23,RT27(Wilsonetal.
1997)andSrcrsp-10(Bhebheetal.
1994).
Welabeledforwardprimerswithfluorescentdyes(NED,HEX,FAM)andseparatedmicrosatellitefragmentsonanABI3730XLcapillarysequencer(AppliedBiosystems,FosterCity,CA).
WevisualizedmicrosatellitegenotypeswithGeneMapper(v.
4.
0;AppliedBiosystems,FosterCity,CA).
WeusedMicro-checker(v.
2.
2.
3;VanOosterhoutetal.
2004)toevaluategenotypingerrorsusingexpectedallelefrequenciesderivedunderHardy-Weinbergequilibrium(HWE).
FSTSurfaceProjectionWeusedtheSingleSpeciesGeneticDivergenceoptionwithintheGeneticLandscapesGIS(GeographicInformationSystem)ToolboxtoprojectasurfacefrompairwiseFSTvaluescalculatedbetweenall31studysites.
TheprogramfirstassociatedpairwiseFST2valueswithmidpointsbetweenallstudysitesandanetworkofnearestneighbors.
Spatialinterpolationwasthenperformedusinganinversedistanceweightedinterpolationalgorithmtoestimategeneticdistancesalongagridoverlaidonthestudyarea.
GeneticdistancesforallpointsacrossthegridwereinterpolatedsuchthatmidpointFSTvaluesthatwerespatiallycloserinfluencedtheestimatemoresothanthosethatweredistant.
Moredetailsontheinterpolationprocedurearedescribedinhttp://www.
werc.
usgs.
gov/productdetails.
aspxid=4017.
FRAGSTATSmetricsTheConnectanceIndex(CONNECT)measuresfunctionalconnectivity,meaningthatgridcellsinthedatathatdepictthetargetvariablearenotliterallyadjacent,buttheyareconsideredadjacent(orconnected)withinagiventhresholddistance.
Inthiscase,adjacencywasdefinedascellswithin100mofeachother.
Theuser-defined100mthresholdwasusedtoaccountforpotentialimprecisionofdataclassificationsatfinespatialresolutionsandtoprovideamorerealistic(i.
e.
,functional)depictionofhowdeermightinteractwiththelandscape.
Themetricitselfisapercentage,witharangeof0to100.
Morespecifically,itmeasuresthepercentageoftargetvariableadjacencies(connectionsorjoins)relativetoallpossibleadjacencies.
FormoreinformationontheConnectanceIndexsee:http://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Connectivity%20Metrics/Metrics/C122%20-%20CONNECT.
htm3ThePatchCohesionIndex(COHESION)isasecondmeasureofconnectivityofalandscapevariable.
Thismetrictakesintoaccountphysicaladjacency(withoutathreshold)incombinationwiththesizeandshapeofthepatches.
Takingforestasanexample,ahigherCOHESIONvaluewouldoccurinalandscapewithlargerandcompactpatchescomparedtoonewithsmallorconvolutedpatches.
FormoreinformationonthePatchCohesionIndexsee:http://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Connectivity%20Metrics/Metrics/C121%20-%20COHESION.
htmTheClumpinessIndex(CLUMPY)isametricindicatinghowcontiguousordispersedaretheadjacentpatchesofalandscapevariable.
AhighervalueofCLUMPYwouldoccurifseveralpatcheswerelocatedclosetogetherratherthanbeingmoreuniformlydistributed.
FormoreinformationontheClumpinessIndex(CLUMPY)seehttp://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Contagion%20-%20Interspersion%20Metrics/Metrics/C115%20-%20CLUMPY.
htmThePerimeter-AreaFractalDimension(PAFRAC)isashapemetricdeterminedacrossarangeofspatialscales.
PARFRACislowforpatcheswithsimpleperimetersandincreasesforpatchshapeswithhighlyconvolutedperimeters.
FormoreinformationonthePerimeter-AreaFractalDimensionIndex(PAFRAC),seehttp://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Shape%20Metrics/Metrics/C23%20-%20PAFRAC.
htm.
Multivariatelinearregressionanalysis4DescriptionandsourceoflandscapevariablesincludedinmultivariateregressionanalysisarelistedinTableS1.
Topreventoverlyinfluentialobservationsfrombiasingourmodels,weusedleveragescores,Cook'sDvalues,andstandardizedinfluencevaluestoidentifyoutliers(Kieetal.
2002;ChatterjeeandHadi2009;Anlaufetal.
2011).
Leveragescoresidentifyobservationsthatresultinlargechangesinregressionlinefitupontheirdeletion.
Wecalculatedleverage(pi)accordingtoChatterjeeandHadi(1986)andconsideredobservationsoverlyinfluentialwhenpi>2p/N(p=numberofindependentvariablesinthemodel;N=numberofobservations).
Cook'sDvalueswerecalculatedaccordingtoCook(1977)andcomparedtoanFdistributionwithα=0.
05and(N-p)degreesoffreedom.
AllCook'sDvalues>thecriticalFvaluewereconsideredoverlyinfluentialandremovedfromthemodel(Cook1977).
LeveragescoresandCook'sDallowedustodeterminetheeffectsofoutliersontheoverallmodel,butstandardizedinfluencevalues(DFFITS)allowedustoexaminetheinfluenceofeachobservationonitspredictedvalue.
WecalculatedDFFITSaccordingtoChatterjeeandHadi(1986)andeliminatedobservationsyieldingvalues>2)/(Np(ChatterjeeandHadi1986).
Usingthesethreecriteria,weidentifiedthirteenobservationsoutof465(2.
8%)thatwereoutliersandafterstringentlyevaluatingtheirbasis(Motulsky2010),weomittedthemduringfurtheranalyses.
Themajorityoftheoutliersremoved(7/13)involvedstudysitesthathadrelativelylowsamplesizes.
Threeofthirteenoutliersinvolvedpairwisecomparisonswithstudysite27,thoughtheremainingtenoutliersappearedtoinvolvestudysitesthatwererandomlydistributedgeographically.
AsingleoutlierhadthehighestFSTvalueobserved,thoughtheremainingoutliersdidnotexhibitunusuallyhighorlowFSTvaluesascomparedtotherestofthe5dataset.
WecomparedvaluesofdependentvariablesofoutlierstovaluesfortherestofthedatabyexaminingboxplotsandplottingdependentvariablesagainstFSTvalues(datanotshown).
Trendsinthedistributionofvaluesfordependentvariablewerenotapparentinoutliersascomparedtotherestofthedata.
Whentwoormorelandscapevariableswerehighlycorrelated(Pearson'srP>0.
7),thepredictorwiththelowestpartialcorrelationinthefullmodelwasremoved.
RemovinglandscapevariableswithrP>0.
7(n=7)resultedinagenerallackofcollinearityamongpredictorsasdeterminedbyvarianceinflationfactors.
CorrelatedpredictorsthatwereremovedfromthemodelarelistedinTableS2.
Weusedvarianceinflationfactors(VIF)toevaluatetheincreaseinvarianceforestimatedregressioncoefficientsresultingfromcollinearpredictors,withVIF>10indicativeofhighmulticollinearity(Kutneretal.
2004).
Afterremovinghighlycorrelatedvariables,wecalculatedvarianceinflationfactorsforindependentvariablesandfoundthatthevarianceofestimatedregressioncoefficientswasnotsubstantiallyincreasedbycollinearpredictorsasVIFvaluesforallpredictorswere0.
7thatweresubsequentlyremovedfromthemodel.
VariableCorrelateDirectionofCorrelationVariableRemoved*%GrasslandSlope+%GrasslandForestCONNECTDevelopedCONNECT+ForestCONNECT%GrasslandGrasslandCONNECT-%GrasslandForestCONNECTGrasslandCONNECT+ForestCONNECTForestCONNECTWaterCONNECT+ForestCONNECTAgricultureCLUMPY%Agriculture-AgricultureCLUMPY%RiparianSlope+Slope%GrasslandForestCLUMPY-%GrasslandForestCONNECTDistance-ForestCONNECTSlopeGrasslandCOHESION+SlopeDevelopedCONNECTGrasslandCONNECT+DevelopedCONNECTGrasslandPAFRACSlope+SlopeDevelopedCONNECTWaterCONNECT+DevelopedCONNECT%GrasslandAgricultureCLUMPY-%Grassland%GrasslandAgriculturePAFRAC+%GrasslandDistanceDevelopedCONNECT-DevelopedCONNECTForestCONNECTWaterCONNECT+ForestCONNECT%AgricultureAgricultureCOHESION+AgricultureCOHESIONWaterCOHESIONWaterCLUMPY+WaterCLUMPY*thepredictorwiththelowestpartialcorrelationinthefullmodelwasremoved.
10TableS3.
Percentsignificant(P<0.
05)localr,rangeoflocalr,andmeanlocalrforfive,15and25nearestneighborsingroupsofwhite-taileddeerinnorthernIllinois(NIL),DuPageCounty(DuP),andWisconsin(WI).
GroupNumberofNearestNeighbors51525%P<0.
051MaxrMeanr%P<0.
051MaxrMeanr%P<0.
051MaxrMeanrAdultMales5.
70.
160.
134.
40.
110.
087.
90.
080.
06MaleYearlings7.
00.
280.
1711.
60.
180.
0914.
10.
120.
06MaleFawns9.
30.
190.
1511.
30.
090.
078.
20.
060.
05AdultMalesandFemaleYearlings6.
40.
270.
147.
60.
120.
088.
10.
090.
06AdultFemales14.
70.
320.
1618.
80.
240.
0920.
50.
150.
07FemaleYearlings5.
70.
160.
124.
80.
110.
074.
80.
070.
05FemaleFawns17.
10.
240.
1415.
20.
130.
0919.
50.
090.
06AdultFemalesandFawns16.
00.
310.
1622.
80.
230.
1024.
50.
190.
081NumberofautocorrelationcoefficientsthatweresignificantatP<0.
05dividedbythetotalnumberautocorrelationcoefficientscalculatedforeachgroup*100.
Includingonlysignificantlocalrvalues.
- connectivity网易轻博客相关文档
- 香港网易轻博客
- multiple网易轻博客
- 金融服务外包动态
- x2100网易轻博客
- 意象网易轻博客
- descriptive网易轻博客
MOACK：韩国服务器/双E5-2450L/8GB内存/1T硬盘/10M不限流量,$59.00/月
Moack怎么样?Moack(蘑菇主机)是一家成立于2016年的商家，据说是国人和韩国合资开办的主机商家，目前主要销售独立服务器，机房位于韩国MOACK机房，网络接入了kt/lg/kinx三条线路，目前到中国大陆的速度非常好，国内Ping值平均在45MS左右，而且商家的套餐比较便宜，针对国人有很多活动。不过目前如果购买机器如需现场处理，由于COVID-19越来越严重，MOACK办公楼里的人也被感染...
HostKvm（$4.25/月），俄罗斯CN2带宽大升级,俄罗斯/香港高防限量5折优惠进行中
HostKvm是一家成立于2013年的国外VPS服务商，产品基于KVM架构，数据中心包括日本、新加坡、韩国、美国、俄罗斯、中国香港等多个地区机房，均为国内直连或优化线路，延迟较低，适合建站或者远程办公等。本月，商家旗下俄罗斯、新加坡、美国、香港等节点带宽进行了大幅度升级，俄罗斯机房国内电信/联通直连，CN2线路，150Mbps(原来30Mbps)带宽起，目前俄罗斯和香港高防节点5折骨折码继续优惠中...
hostodo：美国大流量VPS，低至$3，8T流量/月-1.5G内存/1核/25gNVMe/拉斯维加斯+迈阿密
hostodo从2014年年底运作至今一直都是走低价促销侧率运作VPS，在市场上一直都是那种不温不火的品牌知名度，好在坚持了7年都还运作得好好的，站长觉得hostodo还是值得大家在买VPS的时候作为一个候选考虑项的。当前，hostodo有拉斯维加斯和迈阿密两个数据中心的VPS在促销，专门列出了2款VPS给8T流量/月，基于KVM虚拟+NVMe整列，年付送DirectAdmin授权（发ticket...
网易轻博客为你推荐
-
企业虚拟主机一个企业网站是什么比较划算，买服务器还是买虚拟主机呢域名空间代理哪里的域名空间商比较好?linux主机【windows主机换Linux主机该怎么弄啊？需要注意些什么呢？】广东虚拟主机广东哪里可以购买教育网虚拟主机？美国vps主机求介绍一款英国的VPS主机？免费网站域名申请哪有里可以申请免费域名的网站？网站空间域名什么是网站域名和网站空间海外域名外贸网站如何选择合适的海外域名？虚拟主机管理系统如何用win虚拟主机管理系统搭建山东虚拟主机青岛网络公司哪家好