connectivity网易轻博客
网易轻博客 时间:2021-01-13 阅读:()
1ElectronicSupplementaryMaterialGeneticAssessmentofEnvironmentalFeaturesthatInfluenceDeerDispersal:ImplicationsforPrion-InfectedPopulationsAmyC.
Kelly,NohraE.
Mateus-Pinilla,WilliamBrown,MarilynO.
Ruiz,MarlisR.
Douglas,MichaelE.
Douglas,PaulShelton,TomBeissel,JanNovakofskiMicrosatelliteMarkersThefollowingmicrosatelliteswereemployedinthisstudy:BM1225,BM4107,CSN3,(Bishopetal.
1994),IGF-1(Kirkpatrick1992),OBCAM(Friesetal.
1993),OarFcb304(Buchananetal.
1993),RT20,RT23,RT27(Wilsonetal.
1997)andSrcrsp-10(Bhebheetal.
1994).
Welabeledforwardprimerswithfluorescentdyes(NED,HEX,FAM)andseparatedmicrosatellitefragmentsonanABI3730XLcapillarysequencer(AppliedBiosystems,FosterCity,CA).
WevisualizedmicrosatellitegenotypeswithGeneMapper(v.
4.
0;AppliedBiosystems,FosterCity,CA).
WeusedMicro-checker(v.
2.
2.
3;VanOosterhoutetal.
2004)toevaluategenotypingerrorsusingexpectedallelefrequenciesderivedunderHardy-Weinbergequilibrium(HWE).
FSTSurfaceProjectionWeusedtheSingleSpeciesGeneticDivergenceoptionwithintheGeneticLandscapesGIS(GeographicInformationSystem)ToolboxtoprojectasurfacefrompairwiseFSTvaluescalculatedbetweenall31studysites.
TheprogramfirstassociatedpairwiseFST2valueswithmidpointsbetweenallstudysitesandanetworkofnearestneighbors.
Spatialinterpolationwasthenperformedusinganinversedistanceweightedinterpolationalgorithmtoestimategeneticdistancesalongagridoverlaidonthestudyarea.
GeneticdistancesforallpointsacrossthegridwereinterpolatedsuchthatmidpointFSTvaluesthatwerespatiallycloserinfluencedtheestimatemoresothanthosethatweredistant.
Moredetailsontheinterpolationprocedurearedescribedinhttp://www.
werc.
usgs.
gov/productdetails.
aspxid=4017.
FRAGSTATSmetricsTheConnectanceIndex(CONNECT)measuresfunctionalconnectivity,meaningthatgridcellsinthedatathatdepictthetargetvariablearenotliterallyadjacent,buttheyareconsideredadjacent(orconnected)withinagiventhresholddistance.
Inthiscase,adjacencywasdefinedascellswithin100mofeachother.
Theuser-defined100mthresholdwasusedtoaccountforpotentialimprecisionofdataclassificationsatfinespatialresolutionsandtoprovideamorerealistic(i.
e.
,functional)depictionofhowdeermightinteractwiththelandscape.
Themetricitselfisapercentage,witharangeof0to100.
Morespecifically,itmeasuresthepercentageoftargetvariableadjacencies(connectionsorjoins)relativetoallpossibleadjacencies.
FormoreinformationontheConnectanceIndexsee:http://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Connectivity%20Metrics/Metrics/C122%20-%20CONNECT.
htm3ThePatchCohesionIndex(COHESION)isasecondmeasureofconnectivityofalandscapevariable.
Thismetrictakesintoaccountphysicaladjacency(withoutathreshold)incombinationwiththesizeandshapeofthepatches.
Takingforestasanexample,ahigherCOHESIONvaluewouldoccurinalandscapewithlargerandcompactpatchescomparedtoonewithsmallorconvolutedpatches.
FormoreinformationonthePatchCohesionIndexsee:http://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Connectivity%20Metrics/Metrics/C121%20-%20COHESION.
htmTheClumpinessIndex(CLUMPY)isametricindicatinghowcontiguousordispersedaretheadjacentpatchesofalandscapevariable.
AhighervalueofCLUMPYwouldoccurifseveralpatcheswerelocatedclosetogetherratherthanbeingmoreuniformlydistributed.
FormoreinformationontheClumpinessIndex(CLUMPY)seehttp://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Contagion%20-%20Interspersion%20Metrics/Metrics/C115%20-%20CLUMPY.
htmThePerimeter-AreaFractalDimension(PAFRAC)isashapemetricdeterminedacrossarangeofspatialscales.
PARFRACislowforpatcheswithsimpleperimetersandincreasesforpatchshapeswithhighlyconvolutedperimeters.
FormoreinformationonthePerimeter-AreaFractalDimensionIndex(PAFRAC),seehttp://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Shape%20Metrics/Metrics/C23%20-%20PAFRAC.
htm.
Multivariatelinearregressionanalysis4DescriptionandsourceoflandscapevariablesincludedinmultivariateregressionanalysisarelistedinTableS1.
Topreventoverlyinfluentialobservationsfrombiasingourmodels,weusedleveragescores,Cook'sDvalues,andstandardizedinfluencevaluestoidentifyoutliers(Kieetal.
2002;ChatterjeeandHadi2009;Anlaufetal.
2011).
Leveragescoresidentifyobservationsthatresultinlargechangesinregressionlinefitupontheirdeletion.
Wecalculatedleverage(pi)accordingtoChatterjeeandHadi(1986)andconsideredobservationsoverlyinfluentialwhenpi>2p/N(p=numberofindependentvariablesinthemodel;N=numberofobservations).
Cook'sDvalueswerecalculatedaccordingtoCook(1977)andcomparedtoanFdistributionwithα=0.
05and(N-p)degreesoffreedom.
AllCook'sDvalues>thecriticalFvaluewereconsideredoverlyinfluentialandremovedfromthemodel(Cook1977).
LeveragescoresandCook'sDallowedustodeterminetheeffectsofoutliersontheoverallmodel,butstandardizedinfluencevalues(DFFITS)allowedustoexaminetheinfluenceofeachobservationonitspredictedvalue.
WecalculatedDFFITSaccordingtoChatterjeeandHadi(1986)andeliminatedobservationsyieldingvalues>2)/(Np(ChatterjeeandHadi1986).
Usingthesethreecriteria,weidentifiedthirteenobservationsoutof465(2.
8%)thatwereoutliersandafterstringentlyevaluatingtheirbasis(Motulsky2010),weomittedthemduringfurtheranalyses.
Themajorityoftheoutliersremoved(7/13)involvedstudysitesthathadrelativelylowsamplesizes.
Threeofthirteenoutliersinvolvedpairwisecomparisonswithstudysite27,thoughtheremainingtenoutliersappearedtoinvolvestudysitesthatwererandomlydistributedgeographically.
AsingleoutlierhadthehighestFSTvalueobserved,thoughtheremainingoutliersdidnotexhibitunusuallyhighorlowFSTvaluesascomparedtotherestofthe5dataset.
WecomparedvaluesofdependentvariablesofoutlierstovaluesfortherestofthedatabyexaminingboxplotsandplottingdependentvariablesagainstFSTvalues(datanotshown).
Trendsinthedistributionofvaluesfordependentvariablewerenotapparentinoutliersascomparedtotherestofthedata.
Whentwoormorelandscapevariableswerehighlycorrelated(Pearson'srP>0.
7),thepredictorwiththelowestpartialcorrelationinthefullmodelwasremoved.
RemovinglandscapevariableswithrP>0.
7(n=7)resultedinagenerallackofcollinearityamongpredictorsasdeterminedbyvarianceinflationfactors.
CorrelatedpredictorsthatwereremovedfromthemodelarelistedinTableS2.
Weusedvarianceinflationfactors(VIF)toevaluatetheincreaseinvarianceforestimatedregressioncoefficientsresultingfromcollinearpredictors,withVIF>10indicativeofhighmulticollinearity(Kutneretal.
2004).
Afterremovinghighlycorrelatedvariables,wecalculatedvarianceinflationfactorsforindependentvariablesandfoundthatthevarianceofestimatedregressioncoefficientswasnotsubstantiallyincreasedbycollinearpredictorsasVIFvaluesforallpredictorswere0.
7thatweresubsequentlyremovedfromthemodel.
VariableCorrelateDirectionofCorrelationVariableRemoved*%GrasslandSlope+%GrasslandForestCONNECTDevelopedCONNECT+ForestCONNECT%GrasslandGrasslandCONNECT-%GrasslandForestCONNECTGrasslandCONNECT+ForestCONNECTForestCONNECTWaterCONNECT+ForestCONNECTAgricultureCLUMPY%Agriculture-AgricultureCLUMPY%RiparianSlope+Slope%GrasslandForestCLUMPY-%GrasslandForestCONNECTDistance-ForestCONNECTSlopeGrasslandCOHESION+SlopeDevelopedCONNECTGrasslandCONNECT+DevelopedCONNECTGrasslandPAFRACSlope+SlopeDevelopedCONNECTWaterCONNECT+DevelopedCONNECT%GrasslandAgricultureCLUMPY-%Grassland%GrasslandAgriculturePAFRAC+%GrasslandDistanceDevelopedCONNECT-DevelopedCONNECTForestCONNECTWaterCONNECT+ForestCONNECT%AgricultureAgricultureCOHESION+AgricultureCOHESIONWaterCOHESIONWaterCLUMPY+WaterCLUMPY*thepredictorwiththelowestpartialcorrelationinthefullmodelwasremoved.
10TableS3.
Percentsignificant(P<0.
05)localr,rangeoflocalr,andmeanlocalrforfive,15and25nearestneighborsingroupsofwhite-taileddeerinnorthernIllinois(NIL),DuPageCounty(DuP),andWisconsin(WI).
GroupNumberofNearestNeighbors51525%P<0.
051MaxrMeanr%P<0.
051MaxrMeanr%P<0.
051MaxrMeanrAdultMales5.
70.
160.
134.
40.
110.
087.
90.
080.
06MaleYearlings7.
00.
280.
1711.
60.
180.
0914.
10.
120.
06MaleFawns9.
30.
190.
1511.
30.
090.
078.
20.
060.
05AdultMalesandFemaleYearlings6.
40.
270.
147.
60.
120.
088.
10.
090.
06AdultFemales14.
70.
320.
1618.
80.
240.
0920.
50.
150.
07FemaleYearlings5.
70.
160.
124.
80.
110.
074.
80.
070.
05FemaleFawns17.
10.
240.
1415.
20.
130.
0919.
50.
090.
06AdultFemalesandFawns16.
00.
310.
1622.
80.
230.
1024.
50.
190.
081NumberofautocorrelationcoefficientsthatweresignificantatP<0.
05dividedbythetotalnumberautocorrelationcoefficientscalculatedforeachgroup*100.
Includingonlysignificantlocalrvalues.
Kelly,NohraE.
Mateus-Pinilla,WilliamBrown,MarilynO.
Ruiz,MarlisR.
Douglas,MichaelE.
Douglas,PaulShelton,TomBeissel,JanNovakofskiMicrosatelliteMarkersThefollowingmicrosatelliteswereemployedinthisstudy:BM1225,BM4107,CSN3,(Bishopetal.
1994),IGF-1(Kirkpatrick1992),OBCAM(Friesetal.
1993),OarFcb304(Buchananetal.
1993),RT20,RT23,RT27(Wilsonetal.
1997)andSrcrsp-10(Bhebheetal.
1994).
Welabeledforwardprimerswithfluorescentdyes(NED,HEX,FAM)andseparatedmicrosatellitefragmentsonanABI3730XLcapillarysequencer(AppliedBiosystems,FosterCity,CA).
WevisualizedmicrosatellitegenotypeswithGeneMapper(v.
4.
0;AppliedBiosystems,FosterCity,CA).
WeusedMicro-checker(v.
2.
2.
3;VanOosterhoutetal.
2004)toevaluategenotypingerrorsusingexpectedallelefrequenciesderivedunderHardy-Weinbergequilibrium(HWE).
FSTSurfaceProjectionWeusedtheSingleSpeciesGeneticDivergenceoptionwithintheGeneticLandscapesGIS(GeographicInformationSystem)ToolboxtoprojectasurfacefrompairwiseFSTvaluescalculatedbetweenall31studysites.
TheprogramfirstassociatedpairwiseFST2valueswithmidpointsbetweenallstudysitesandanetworkofnearestneighbors.
Spatialinterpolationwasthenperformedusinganinversedistanceweightedinterpolationalgorithmtoestimategeneticdistancesalongagridoverlaidonthestudyarea.
GeneticdistancesforallpointsacrossthegridwereinterpolatedsuchthatmidpointFSTvaluesthatwerespatiallycloserinfluencedtheestimatemoresothanthosethatweredistant.
Moredetailsontheinterpolationprocedurearedescribedinhttp://www.
werc.
usgs.
gov/productdetails.
aspxid=4017.
FRAGSTATSmetricsTheConnectanceIndex(CONNECT)measuresfunctionalconnectivity,meaningthatgridcellsinthedatathatdepictthetargetvariablearenotliterallyadjacent,buttheyareconsideredadjacent(orconnected)withinagiventhresholddistance.
Inthiscase,adjacencywasdefinedascellswithin100mofeachother.
Theuser-defined100mthresholdwasusedtoaccountforpotentialimprecisionofdataclassificationsatfinespatialresolutionsandtoprovideamorerealistic(i.
e.
,functional)depictionofhowdeermightinteractwiththelandscape.
Themetricitselfisapercentage,witharangeof0to100.
Morespecifically,itmeasuresthepercentageoftargetvariableadjacencies(connectionsorjoins)relativetoallpossibleadjacencies.
FormoreinformationontheConnectanceIndexsee:http://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Connectivity%20Metrics/Metrics/C122%20-%20CONNECT.
htm3ThePatchCohesionIndex(COHESION)isasecondmeasureofconnectivityofalandscapevariable.
Thismetrictakesintoaccountphysicaladjacency(withoutathreshold)incombinationwiththesizeandshapeofthepatches.
Takingforestasanexample,ahigherCOHESIONvaluewouldoccurinalandscapewithlargerandcompactpatchescomparedtoonewithsmallorconvolutedpatches.
FormoreinformationonthePatchCohesionIndexsee:http://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Connectivity%20Metrics/Metrics/C121%20-%20COHESION.
htmTheClumpinessIndex(CLUMPY)isametricindicatinghowcontiguousordispersedaretheadjacentpatchesofalandscapevariable.
AhighervalueofCLUMPYwouldoccurifseveralpatcheswerelocatedclosetogetherratherthanbeingmoreuniformlydistributed.
FormoreinformationontheClumpinessIndex(CLUMPY)seehttp://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Contagion%20-%20Interspersion%20Metrics/Metrics/C115%20-%20CLUMPY.
htmThePerimeter-AreaFractalDimension(PAFRAC)isashapemetricdeterminedacrossarangeofspatialscales.
PARFRACislowforpatcheswithsimpleperimetersandincreasesforpatchshapeswithhighlyconvolutedperimeters.
FormoreinformationonthePerimeter-AreaFractalDimensionIndex(PAFRAC),seehttp://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Shape%20Metrics/Metrics/C23%20-%20PAFRAC.
htm.
Multivariatelinearregressionanalysis4DescriptionandsourceoflandscapevariablesincludedinmultivariateregressionanalysisarelistedinTableS1.
Topreventoverlyinfluentialobservationsfrombiasingourmodels,weusedleveragescores,Cook'sDvalues,andstandardizedinfluencevaluestoidentifyoutliers(Kieetal.
2002;ChatterjeeandHadi2009;Anlaufetal.
2011).
Leveragescoresidentifyobservationsthatresultinlargechangesinregressionlinefitupontheirdeletion.
Wecalculatedleverage(pi)accordingtoChatterjeeandHadi(1986)andconsideredobservationsoverlyinfluentialwhenpi>2p/N(p=numberofindependentvariablesinthemodel;N=numberofobservations).
Cook'sDvalueswerecalculatedaccordingtoCook(1977)andcomparedtoanFdistributionwithα=0.
05and(N-p)degreesoffreedom.
AllCook'sDvalues>thecriticalFvaluewereconsideredoverlyinfluentialandremovedfromthemodel(Cook1977).
LeveragescoresandCook'sDallowedustodeterminetheeffectsofoutliersontheoverallmodel,butstandardizedinfluencevalues(DFFITS)allowedustoexaminetheinfluenceofeachobservationonitspredictedvalue.
WecalculatedDFFITSaccordingtoChatterjeeandHadi(1986)andeliminatedobservationsyieldingvalues>2)/(Np(ChatterjeeandHadi1986).
Usingthesethreecriteria,weidentifiedthirteenobservationsoutof465(2.
8%)thatwereoutliersandafterstringentlyevaluatingtheirbasis(Motulsky2010),weomittedthemduringfurtheranalyses.
Themajorityoftheoutliersremoved(7/13)involvedstudysitesthathadrelativelylowsamplesizes.
Threeofthirteenoutliersinvolvedpairwisecomparisonswithstudysite27,thoughtheremainingtenoutliersappearedtoinvolvestudysitesthatwererandomlydistributedgeographically.
AsingleoutlierhadthehighestFSTvalueobserved,thoughtheremainingoutliersdidnotexhibitunusuallyhighorlowFSTvaluesascomparedtotherestofthe5dataset.
WecomparedvaluesofdependentvariablesofoutlierstovaluesfortherestofthedatabyexaminingboxplotsandplottingdependentvariablesagainstFSTvalues(datanotshown).
Trendsinthedistributionofvaluesfordependentvariablewerenotapparentinoutliersascomparedtotherestofthedata.
Whentwoormorelandscapevariableswerehighlycorrelated(Pearson'srP>0.
7),thepredictorwiththelowestpartialcorrelationinthefullmodelwasremoved.
RemovinglandscapevariableswithrP>0.
7(n=7)resultedinagenerallackofcollinearityamongpredictorsasdeterminedbyvarianceinflationfactors.
CorrelatedpredictorsthatwereremovedfromthemodelarelistedinTableS2.
Weusedvarianceinflationfactors(VIF)toevaluatetheincreaseinvarianceforestimatedregressioncoefficientsresultingfromcollinearpredictors,withVIF>10indicativeofhighmulticollinearity(Kutneretal.
2004).
Afterremovinghighlycorrelatedvariables,wecalculatedvarianceinflationfactorsforindependentvariablesandfoundthatthevarianceofestimatedregressioncoefficientswasnotsubstantiallyincreasedbycollinearpredictorsasVIFvaluesforallpredictorswere0.
7thatweresubsequentlyremovedfromthemodel.
VariableCorrelateDirectionofCorrelationVariableRemoved*%GrasslandSlope+%GrasslandForestCONNECTDevelopedCONNECT+ForestCONNECT%GrasslandGrasslandCONNECT-%GrasslandForestCONNECTGrasslandCONNECT+ForestCONNECTForestCONNECTWaterCONNECT+ForestCONNECTAgricultureCLUMPY%Agriculture-AgricultureCLUMPY%RiparianSlope+Slope%GrasslandForestCLUMPY-%GrasslandForestCONNECTDistance-ForestCONNECTSlopeGrasslandCOHESION+SlopeDevelopedCONNECTGrasslandCONNECT+DevelopedCONNECTGrasslandPAFRACSlope+SlopeDevelopedCONNECTWaterCONNECT+DevelopedCONNECT%GrasslandAgricultureCLUMPY-%Grassland%GrasslandAgriculturePAFRAC+%GrasslandDistanceDevelopedCONNECT-DevelopedCONNECTForestCONNECTWaterCONNECT+ForestCONNECT%AgricultureAgricultureCOHESION+AgricultureCOHESIONWaterCOHESIONWaterCLUMPY+WaterCLUMPY*thepredictorwiththelowestpartialcorrelationinthefullmodelwasremoved.
10TableS3.
Percentsignificant(P<0.
05)localr,rangeoflocalr,andmeanlocalrforfive,15and25nearestneighborsingroupsofwhite-taileddeerinnorthernIllinois(NIL),DuPageCounty(DuP),andWisconsin(WI).
GroupNumberofNearestNeighbors51525%P<0.
051MaxrMeanr%P<0.
051MaxrMeanr%P<0.
051MaxrMeanrAdultMales5.
70.
160.
134.
40.
110.
087.
90.
080.
06MaleYearlings7.
00.
280.
1711.
60.
180.
0914.
10.
120.
06MaleFawns9.
30.
190.
1511.
30.
090.
078.
20.
060.
05AdultMalesandFemaleYearlings6.
40.
270.
147.
60.
120.
088.
10.
090.
06AdultFemales14.
70.
320.
1618.
80.
240.
0920.
50.
150.
07FemaleYearlings5.
70.
160.
124.
80.
110.
074.
80.
070.
05FemaleFawns17.
10.
240.
1415.
20.
130.
0919.
50.
090.
06AdultFemalesandFawns16.
00.
310.
1622.
80.
230.
1024.
50.
190.
081NumberofautocorrelationcoefficientsthatweresignificantatP<0.
05dividedbythetotalnumberautocorrelationcoefficientscalculatedforeachgroup*100.
Includingonlysignificantlocalrvalues.
- connectivity网易轻博客相关文档
- 香港网易轻博客
- multiple网易轻博客
- 金融服务外包动态
- x2100网易轻博客
- 意象网易轻博客
- descriptive网易轻博客
TmhHost暑假活动：高端线路VPS季付8折优惠,可选洛杉矶CN2 GIA/日本软银/香港三网CN2 GIA/韩国双向CN2等
tmhhost怎么样?tmhhost正在搞暑假大促销活动，全部是高端线路VPS，现在直接季付8折优惠，活动截止时间是8月31日。可选机房及线路有美国洛杉矶cn2 gia+200G高防、洛杉矶三网CN2 GIA、洛杉矶CERA机房CN2 GIA，日本软银(100M带宽)、香港BGP直连200M带宽、香港三网CN2 GIA、韩国双向CN2。点击进入：tmhhost官方网站地址tmhhost优惠码：Tm...
MineServer：洛杉矶CN2 GIA VPS/512MB内存/20GB NVME/800GB流量/200Mbps/KVM,58元/季
mineserver怎么样?mineserver是一家国人商家，主要提供香港CN2 KVM VPS、香港CMI KVM VPS、日本CN2 KVM VPS、洛杉矶cn2 gia端口转发等服务，之前介绍过几次，最近比较活跃。这家新推出了洛杉矶CN2 GIA VPS，512MB内存/20GB NVME/800GB流量/200Mbps/KVM,58元/季，并且进行了带宽升级，同时IP更改为美国IP。点击...
酷番云-618云上秒杀，香港1核2M 29/月，高防服务器20M 147/月 50M 450/月，续费同价！
官方网站：点击访问酷番云官网活动方案：优惠方案一（限时秒杀专场）有需要海外的可以看看，比较划算29月，建议年付划算，月付续费不同价，这个专区。国内节点可以看看，性能高IO为主， 比较少见。平常一般就100IO 左右。优惠方案二（高防专场）高防专区主要以高防为主，节点有宿迁，绍兴，成都，宁波等，节点挺多，都支持防火墙自助控制。续费同价以下专场。 优惠方案三（精选物理机）西南地区节点比较划算，赠送5...
网易轻博客为你推荐
-
免费国内空间谁知道国内哪个免费空间好，要1GB的ip代理地址使用IP代理会有什么坏处吗?虚拟主机软件谁知道这个虚拟机软件叫什么。合肥虚拟主机虚拟主机是干嘛的？买了虚拟主机是否要一台电脑？论坛虚拟主机做论坛-需要什么类型的虚拟主机?淘宝虚拟主机淘宝买万网虚拟主机怎么变别真假mysql虚拟主机哪些类型的虚拟主机支持数据库？河南虚拟主机新网的虚拟主机怎么样？广西虚拟主机网站icp备案流程双线虚拟主机什么是智能双线虚拟主机？联动天下的双线主机有什么优势？