connectivity网易轻博客
网易轻博客 时间:2021-01-13 阅读:()
1ElectronicSupplementaryMaterialGeneticAssessmentofEnvironmentalFeaturesthatInfluenceDeerDispersal:ImplicationsforPrion-InfectedPopulationsAmyC.
Kelly,NohraE.
Mateus-Pinilla,WilliamBrown,MarilynO.
Ruiz,MarlisR.
Douglas,MichaelE.
Douglas,PaulShelton,TomBeissel,JanNovakofskiMicrosatelliteMarkersThefollowingmicrosatelliteswereemployedinthisstudy:BM1225,BM4107,CSN3,(Bishopetal.
1994),IGF-1(Kirkpatrick1992),OBCAM(Friesetal.
1993),OarFcb304(Buchananetal.
1993),RT20,RT23,RT27(Wilsonetal.
1997)andSrcrsp-10(Bhebheetal.
1994).
Welabeledforwardprimerswithfluorescentdyes(NED,HEX,FAM)andseparatedmicrosatellitefragmentsonanABI3730XLcapillarysequencer(AppliedBiosystems,FosterCity,CA).
WevisualizedmicrosatellitegenotypeswithGeneMapper(v.
4.
0;AppliedBiosystems,FosterCity,CA).
WeusedMicro-checker(v.
2.
2.
3;VanOosterhoutetal.
2004)toevaluategenotypingerrorsusingexpectedallelefrequenciesderivedunderHardy-Weinbergequilibrium(HWE).
FSTSurfaceProjectionWeusedtheSingleSpeciesGeneticDivergenceoptionwithintheGeneticLandscapesGIS(GeographicInformationSystem)ToolboxtoprojectasurfacefrompairwiseFSTvaluescalculatedbetweenall31studysites.
TheprogramfirstassociatedpairwiseFST2valueswithmidpointsbetweenallstudysitesandanetworkofnearestneighbors.
Spatialinterpolationwasthenperformedusinganinversedistanceweightedinterpolationalgorithmtoestimategeneticdistancesalongagridoverlaidonthestudyarea.
GeneticdistancesforallpointsacrossthegridwereinterpolatedsuchthatmidpointFSTvaluesthatwerespatiallycloserinfluencedtheestimatemoresothanthosethatweredistant.
Moredetailsontheinterpolationprocedurearedescribedinhttp://www.
werc.
usgs.
gov/productdetails.
aspxid=4017.
FRAGSTATSmetricsTheConnectanceIndex(CONNECT)measuresfunctionalconnectivity,meaningthatgridcellsinthedatathatdepictthetargetvariablearenotliterallyadjacent,buttheyareconsideredadjacent(orconnected)withinagiventhresholddistance.
Inthiscase,adjacencywasdefinedascellswithin100mofeachother.
Theuser-defined100mthresholdwasusedtoaccountforpotentialimprecisionofdataclassificationsatfinespatialresolutionsandtoprovideamorerealistic(i.
e.
,functional)depictionofhowdeermightinteractwiththelandscape.
Themetricitselfisapercentage,witharangeof0to100.
Morespecifically,itmeasuresthepercentageoftargetvariableadjacencies(connectionsorjoins)relativetoallpossibleadjacencies.
FormoreinformationontheConnectanceIndexsee:http://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Connectivity%20Metrics/Metrics/C122%20-%20CONNECT.
htm3ThePatchCohesionIndex(COHESION)isasecondmeasureofconnectivityofalandscapevariable.
Thismetrictakesintoaccountphysicaladjacency(withoutathreshold)incombinationwiththesizeandshapeofthepatches.
Takingforestasanexample,ahigherCOHESIONvaluewouldoccurinalandscapewithlargerandcompactpatchescomparedtoonewithsmallorconvolutedpatches.
FormoreinformationonthePatchCohesionIndexsee:http://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Connectivity%20Metrics/Metrics/C121%20-%20COHESION.
htmTheClumpinessIndex(CLUMPY)isametricindicatinghowcontiguousordispersedaretheadjacentpatchesofalandscapevariable.
AhighervalueofCLUMPYwouldoccurifseveralpatcheswerelocatedclosetogetherratherthanbeingmoreuniformlydistributed.
FormoreinformationontheClumpinessIndex(CLUMPY)seehttp://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Contagion%20-%20Interspersion%20Metrics/Metrics/C115%20-%20CLUMPY.
htmThePerimeter-AreaFractalDimension(PAFRAC)isashapemetricdeterminedacrossarangeofspatialscales.
PARFRACislowforpatcheswithsimpleperimetersandincreasesforpatchshapeswithhighlyconvolutedperimeters.
FormoreinformationonthePerimeter-AreaFractalDimensionIndex(PAFRAC),seehttp://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Shape%20Metrics/Metrics/C23%20-%20PAFRAC.
htm.
Multivariatelinearregressionanalysis4DescriptionandsourceoflandscapevariablesincludedinmultivariateregressionanalysisarelistedinTableS1.
Topreventoverlyinfluentialobservationsfrombiasingourmodels,weusedleveragescores,Cook'sDvalues,andstandardizedinfluencevaluestoidentifyoutliers(Kieetal.
2002;ChatterjeeandHadi2009;Anlaufetal.
2011).
Leveragescoresidentifyobservationsthatresultinlargechangesinregressionlinefitupontheirdeletion.
Wecalculatedleverage(pi)accordingtoChatterjeeandHadi(1986)andconsideredobservationsoverlyinfluentialwhenpi>2p/N(p=numberofindependentvariablesinthemodel;N=numberofobservations).
Cook'sDvalueswerecalculatedaccordingtoCook(1977)andcomparedtoanFdistributionwithα=0.
05and(N-p)degreesoffreedom.
AllCook'sDvalues>thecriticalFvaluewereconsideredoverlyinfluentialandremovedfromthemodel(Cook1977).
LeveragescoresandCook'sDallowedustodeterminetheeffectsofoutliersontheoverallmodel,butstandardizedinfluencevalues(DFFITS)allowedustoexaminetheinfluenceofeachobservationonitspredictedvalue.
WecalculatedDFFITSaccordingtoChatterjeeandHadi(1986)andeliminatedobservationsyieldingvalues>2)/(Np(ChatterjeeandHadi1986).
Usingthesethreecriteria,weidentifiedthirteenobservationsoutof465(2.
8%)thatwereoutliersandafterstringentlyevaluatingtheirbasis(Motulsky2010),weomittedthemduringfurtheranalyses.
Themajorityoftheoutliersremoved(7/13)involvedstudysitesthathadrelativelylowsamplesizes.
Threeofthirteenoutliersinvolvedpairwisecomparisonswithstudysite27,thoughtheremainingtenoutliersappearedtoinvolvestudysitesthatwererandomlydistributedgeographically.
AsingleoutlierhadthehighestFSTvalueobserved,thoughtheremainingoutliersdidnotexhibitunusuallyhighorlowFSTvaluesascomparedtotherestofthe5dataset.
WecomparedvaluesofdependentvariablesofoutlierstovaluesfortherestofthedatabyexaminingboxplotsandplottingdependentvariablesagainstFSTvalues(datanotshown).
Trendsinthedistributionofvaluesfordependentvariablewerenotapparentinoutliersascomparedtotherestofthedata.
Whentwoormorelandscapevariableswerehighlycorrelated(Pearson'srP>0.
7),thepredictorwiththelowestpartialcorrelationinthefullmodelwasremoved.
RemovinglandscapevariableswithrP>0.
7(n=7)resultedinagenerallackofcollinearityamongpredictorsasdeterminedbyvarianceinflationfactors.
CorrelatedpredictorsthatwereremovedfromthemodelarelistedinTableS2.
Weusedvarianceinflationfactors(VIF)toevaluatetheincreaseinvarianceforestimatedregressioncoefficientsresultingfromcollinearpredictors,withVIF>10indicativeofhighmulticollinearity(Kutneretal.
2004).
Afterremovinghighlycorrelatedvariables,wecalculatedvarianceinflationfactorsforindependentvariablesandfoundthatthevarianceofestimatedregressioncoefficientswasnotsubstantiallyincreasedbycollinearpredictorsasVIFvaluesforallpredictorswere0.
7thatweresubsequentlyremovedfromthemodel.
VariableCorrelateDirectionofCorrelationVariableRemoved*%GrasslandSlope+%GrasslandForestCONNECTDevelopedCONNECT+ForestCONNECT%GrasslandGrasslandCONNECT-%GrasslandForestCONNECTGrasslandCONNECT+ForestCONNECTForestCONNECTWaterCONNECT+ForestCONNECTAgricultureCLUMPY%Agriculture-AgricultureCLUMPY%RiparianSlope+Slope%GrasslandForestCLUMPY-%GrasslandForestCONNECTDistance-ForestCONNECTSlopeGrasslandCOHESION+SlopeDevelopedCONNECTGrasslandCONNECT+DevelopedCONNECTGrasslandPAFRACSlope+SlopeDevelopedCONNECTWaterCONNECT+DevelopedCONNECT%GrasslandAgricultureCLUMPY-%Grassland%GrasslandAgriculturePAFRAC+%GrasslandDistanceDevelopedCONNECT-DevelopedCONNECTForestCONNECTWaterCONNECT+ForestCONNECT%AgricultureAgricultureCOHESION+AgricultureCOHESIONWaterCOHESIONWaterCLUMPY+WaterCLUMPY*thepredictorwiththelowestpartialcorrelationinthefullmodelwasremoved.
10TableS3.
Percentsignificant(P<0.
05)localr,rangeoflocalr,andmeanlocalrforfive,15and25nearestneighborsingroupsofwhite-taileddeerinnorthernIllinois(NIL),DuPageCounty(DuP),andWisconsin(WI).
GroupNumberofNearestNeighbors51525%P<0.
051MaxrMeanr%P<0.
051MaxrMeanr%P<0.
051MaxrMeanrAdultMales5.
70.
160.
134.
40.
110.
087.
90.
080.
06MaleYearlings7.
00.
280.
1711.
60.
180.
0914.
10.
120.
06MaleFawns9.
30.
190.
1511.
30.
090.
078.
20.
060.
05AdultMalesandFemaleYearlings6.
40.
270.
147.
60.
120.
088.
10.
090.
06AdultFemales14.
70.
320.
1618.
80.
240.
0920.
50.
150.
07FemaleYearlings5.
70.
160.
124.
80.
110.
074.
80.
070.
05FemaleFawns17.
10.
240.
1415.
20.
130.
0919.
50.
090.
06AdultFemalesandFawns16.
00.
310.
1622.
80.
230.
1024.
50.
190.
081NumberofautocorrelationcoefficientsthatweresignificantatP<0.
05dividedbythetotalnumberautocorrelationcoefficientscalculatedforeachgroup*100.
Includingonlysignificantlocalrvalues.
Kelly,NohraE.
Mateus-Pinilla,WilliamBrown,MarilynO.
Ruiz,MarlisR.
Douglas,MichaelE.
Douglas,PaulShelton,TomBeissel,JanNovakofskiMicrosatelliteMarkersThefollowingmicrosatelliteswereemployedinthisstudy:BM1225,BM4107,CSN3,(Bishopetal.
1994),IGF-1(Kirkpatrick1992),OBCAM(Friesetal.
1993),OarFcb304(Buchananetal.
1993),RT20,RT23,RT27(Wilsonetal.
1997)andSrcrsp-10(Bhebheetal.
1994).
Welabeledforwardprimerswithfluorescentdyes(NED,HEX,FAM)andseparatedmicrosatellitefragmentsonanABI3730XLcapillarysequencer(AppliedBiosystems,FosterCity,CA).
WevisualizedmicrosatellitegenotypeswithGeneMapper(v.
4.
0;AppliedBiosystems,FosterCity,CA).
WeusedMicro-checker(v.
2.
2.
3;VanOosterhoutetal.
2004)toevaluategenotypingerrorsusingexpectedallelefrequenciesderivedunderHardy-Weinbergequilibrium(HWE).
FSTSurfaceProjectionWeusedtheSingleSpeciesGeneticDivergenceoptionwithintheGeneticLandscapesGIS(GeographicInformationSystem)ToolboxtoprojectasurfacefrompairwiseFSTvaluescalculatedbetweenall31studysites.
TheprogramfirstassociatedpairwiseFST2valueswithmidpointsbetweenallstudysitesandanetworkofnearestneighbors.
Spatialinterpolationwasthenperformedusinganinversedistanceweightedinterpolationalgorithmtoestimategeneticdistancesalongagridoverlaidonthestudyarea.
GeneticdistancesforallpointsacrossthegridwereinterpolatedsuchthatmidpointFSTvaluesthatwerespatiallycloserinfluencedtheestimatemoresothanthosethatweredistant.
Moredetailsontheinterpolationprocedurearedescribedinhttp://www.
werc.
usgs.
gov/productdetails.
aspxid=4017.
FRAGSTATSmetricsTheConnectanceIndex(CONNECT)measuresfunctionalconnectivity,meaningthatgridcellsinthedatathatdepictthetargetvariablearenotliterallyadjacent,buttheyareconsideredadjacent(orconnected)withinagiventhresholddistance.
Inthiscase,adjacencywasdefinedascellswithin100mofeachother.
Theuser-defined100mthresholdwasusedtoaccountforpotentialimprecisionofdataclassificationsatfinespatialresolutionsandtoprovideamorerealistic(i.
e.
,functional)depictionofhowdeermightinteractwiththelandscape.
Themetricitselfisapercentage,witharangeof0to100.
Morespecifically,itmeasuresthepercentageoftargetvariableadjacencies(connectionsorjoins)relativetoallpossibleadjacencies.
FormoreinformationontheConnectanceIndexsee:http://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Connectivity%20Metrics/Metrics/C122%20-%20CONNECT.
htm3ThePatchCohesionIndex(COHESION)isasecondmeasureofconnectivityofalandscapevariable.
Thismetrictakesintoaccountphysicaladjacency(withoutathreshold)incombinationwiththesizeandshapeofthepatches.
Takingforestasanexample,ahigherCOHESIONvaluewouldoccurinalandscapewithlargerandcompactpatchescomparedtoonewithsmallorconvolutedpatches.
FormoreinformationonthePatchCohesionIndexsee:http://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Connectivity%20Metrics/Metrics/C121%20-%20COHESION.
htmTheClumpinessIndex(CLUMPY)isametricindicatinghowcontiguousordispersedaretheadjacentpatchesofalandscapevariable.
AhighervalueofCLUMPYwouldoccurifseveralpatcheswerelocatedclosetogetherratherthanbeingmoreuniformlydistributed.
FormoreinformationontheClumpinessIndex(CLUMPY)seehttp://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Contagion%20-%20Interspersion%20Metrics/Metrics/C115%20-%20CLUMPY.
htmThePerimeter-AreaFractalDimension(PAFRAC)isashapemetricdeterminedacrossarangeofspatialscales.
PARFRACislowforpatcheswithsimpleperimetersandincreasesforpatchshapeswithhighlyconvolutedperimeters.
FormoreinformationonthePerimeter-AreaFractalDimensionIndex(PAFRAC),seehttp://www.
umass.
edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Shape%20Metrics/Metrics/C23%20-%20PAFRAC.
htm.
Multivariatelinearregressionanalysis4DescriptionandsourceoflandscapevariablesincludedinmultivariateregressionanalysisarelistedinTableS1.
Topreventoverlyinfluentialobservationsfrombiasingourmodels,weusedleveragescores,Cook'sDvalues,andstandardizedinfluencevaluestoidentifyoutliers(Kieetal.
2002;ChatterjeeandHadi2009;Anlaufetal.
2011).
Leveragescoresidentifyobservationsthatresultinlargechangesinregressionlinefitupontheirdeletion.
Wecalculatedleverage(pi)accordingtoChatterjeeandHadi(1986)andconsideredobservationsoverlyinfluentialwhenpi>2p/N(p=numberofindependentvariablesinthemodel;N=numberofobservations).
Cook'sDvalueswerecalculatedaccordingtoCook(1977)andcomparedtoanFdistributionwithα=0.
05and(N-p)degreesoffreedom.
AllCook'sDvalues>thecriticalFvaluewereconsideredoverlyinfluentialandremovedfromthemodel(Cook1977).
LeveragescoresandCook'sDallowedustodeterminetheeffectsofoutliersontheoverallmodel,butstandardizedinfluencevalues(DFFITS)allowedustoexaminetheinfluenceofeachobservationonitspredictedvalue.
WecalculatedDFFITSaccordingtoChatterjeeandHadi(1986)andeliminatedobservationsyieldingvalues>2)/(Np(ChatterjeeandHadi1986).
Usingthesethreecriteria,weidentifiedthirteenobservationsoutof465(2.
8%)thatwereoutliersandafterstringentlyevaluatingtheirbasis(Motulsky2010),weomittedthemduringfurtheranalyses.
Themajorityoftheoutliersremoved(7/13)involvedstudysitesthathadrelativelylowsamplesizes.
Threeofthirteenoutliersinvolvedpairwisecomparisonswithstudysite27,thoughtheremainingtenoutliersappearedtoinvolvestudysitesthatwererandomlydistributedgeographically.
AsingleoutlierhadthehighestFSTvalueobserved,thoughtheremainingoutliersdidnotexhibitunusuallyhighorlowFSTvaluesascomparedtotherestofthe5dataset.
WecomparedvaluesofdependentvariablesofoutlierstovaluesfortherestofthedatabyexaminingboxplotsandplottingdependentvariablesagainstFSTvalues(datanotshown).
Trendsinthedistributionofvaluesfordependentvariablewerenotapparentinoutliersascomparedtotherestofthedata.
Whentwoormorelandscapevariableswerehighlycorrelated(Pearson'srP>0.
7),thepredictorwiththelowestpartialcorrelationinthefullmodelwasremoved.
RemovinglandscapevariableswithrP>0.
7(n=7)resultedinagenerallackofcollinearityamongpredictorsasdeterminedbyvarianceinflationfactors.
CorrelatedpredictorsthatwereremovedfromthemodelarelistedinTableS2.
Weusedvarianceinflationfactors(VIF)toevaluatetheincreaseinvarianceforestimatedregressioncoefficientsresultingfromcollinearpredictors,withVIF>10indicativeofhighmulticollinearity(Kutneretal.
2004).
Afterremovinghighlycorrelatedvariables,wecalculatedvarianceinflationfactorsforindependentvariablesandfoundthatthevarianceofestimatedregressioncoefficientswasnotsubstantiallyincreasedbycollinearpredictorsasVIFvaluesforallpredictorswere0.
7thatweresubsequentlyremovedfromthemodel.
VariableCorrelateDirectionofCorrelationVariableRemoved*%GrasslandSlope+%GrasslandForestCONNECTDevelopedCONNECT+ForestCONNECT%GrasslandGrasslandCONNECT-%GrasslandForestCONNECTGrasslandCONNECT+ForestCONNECTForestCONNECTWaterCONNECT+ForestCONNECTAgricultureCLUMPY%Agriculture-AgricultureCLUMPY%RiparianSlope+Slope%GrasslandForestCLUMPY-%GrasslandForestCONNECTDistance-ForestCONNECTSlopeGrasslandCOHESION+SlopeDevelopedCONNECTGrasslandCONNECT+DevelopedCONNECTGrasslandPAFRACSlope+SlopeDevelopedCONNECTWaterCONNECT+DevelopedCONNECT%GrasslandAgricultureCLUMPY-%Grassland%GrasslandAgriculturePAFRAC+%GrasslandDistanceDevelopedCONNECT-DevelopedCONNECTForestCONNECTWaterCONNECT+ForestCONNECT%AgricultureAgricultureCOHESION+AgricultureCOHESIONWaterCOHESIONWaterCLUMPY+WaterCLUMPY*thepredictorwiththelowestpartialcorrelationinthefullmodelwasremoved.
10TableS3.
Percentsignificant(P<0.
05)localr,rangeoflocalr,andmeanlocalrforfive,15and25nearestneighborsingroupsofwhite-taileddeerinnorthernIllinois(NIL),DuPageCounty(DuP),andWisconsin(WI).
GroupNumberofNearestNeighbors51525%P<0.
051MaxrMeanr%P<0.
051MaxrMeanr%P<0.
051MaxrMeanrAdultMales5.
70.
160.
134.
40.
110.
087.
90.
080.
06MaleYearlings7.
00.
280.
1711.
60.
180.
0914.
10.
120.
06MaleFawns9.
30.
190.
1511.
30.
090.
078.
20.
060.
05AdultMalesandFemaleYearlings6.
40.
270.
147.
60.
120.
088.
10.
090.
06AdultFemales14.
70.
320.
1618.
80.
240.
0920.
50.
150.
07FemaleYearlings5.
70.
160.
124.
80.
110.
074.
80.
070.
05FemaleFawns17.
10.
240.
1415.
20.
130.
0919.
50.
090.
06AdultFemalesandFawns16.
00.
310.
1622.
80.
230.
1024.
50.
190.
081NumberofautocorrelationcoefficientsthatweresignificantatP<0.
05dividedbythetotalnumberautocorrelationcoefficientscalculatedforeachgroup*100.
Includingonlysignificantlocalrvalues.
- connectivity网易轻博客相关文档
- 香港网易轻博客
- multiple网易轻博客
- 金融服务外包动态
- x2100网易轻博客
- 意象网易轻博客
- descriptive网易轻博客
incogne$2.5/月t芬兰VPS，AMD Ryzen、1Gbps带宽
IncogNet LLC是个由3个人运作的美国公司，主要特色是隐私保护，号称绝对保护用户的隐私安全。业务涵盖虚拟主机、VPS等，支持多种数字加密货币、PayPal付款。注册账号也很简单，输入一个姓名、一个邮箱、国家随便选，填写一个邮箱就搞定了，基本上不管资料的真假。当前促销的vps位于芬兰机房，全部都是AMD Ryzen系列的CPU，性能不会差的！5折优惠码：CRYPTOMONTH，支持：BTC,...
香港E3 16G 390元/ 香港E5*2 32G 600元/ 香港站群 4-8C 1200元/ 美国200G高防 900/ 日本100M 700元
3C云国内IDC/ISP资质齐全商家，与香港公司联合运营， 已超6年运营 。本次为大家带来的是双12特惠活动，香港美国日本韩国|高速精品|高防|站群|大带宽等产品齐全，欢迎咨询问价。3C云科技有限公司官方网站：http://www.3cccy.com/客服QQ：937695003网页客服：点击咨询客户QQ交流群：1042709810价目表总览升级内存 60元 8G内存升级硬盘 1T机械 90元 2...
webhosting24：€28/年，日本NVMe3900X+Webvps
webhosting24决定从7月1日开始对日本机房的VPS进行NVMe和流量大升级，几乎是翻倍了硬盘和流量，当然前提是价格依旧不变。目前来看，国内过去走的是NTT直连，服务器托管机房应该是CDN77*（也就是datapacket.com），加上高性能平台（AMD Ryzen 9 3900X+NVMe），这样的日本VPS还是有相当大的性价比的。官方网站：https://www.webhosting...
网易轻博客为你推荐
-
企业虚拟主机一个企业网站是什么比较划算，买服务器还是买虚拟主机呢国外域名注册国外域名注册什么好的推荐香港虚拟空间香港空间,香港虚拟主机,香港虚拟空间推荐一家，公司要做一个网站，需要1G的，不限流量的，其它的空间不要美国网站空间美国空间做什么网站好？网站空间商网站备案为什么是空间商备案？求解便宜虚拟主机麻烦各位给我推荐一个比较便宜的虚拟主机，要质量好的。谢谢大家了虚拟主机控制面板虚拟主机管理面板与网站后台有什么区别?虚拟主机管理系统什么虚拟主机管理系统支持W和linux操作系统虚拟主机服务商现在市场上那家服务商的虚拟主机性价比最高？重庆虚拟主机万网M3型虚拟主机怎么样？速度如何？